TSTP Solution File: SEU418+4 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SEU418+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:32:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 30.25s 10.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 30.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  38   ~;  31   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (   3 sgn;  49   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t8_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( v1_relat_1(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( v1_relat_1(X3)
             => r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),k3_xboole_0(k5_relat_1(X1,X3),k5_relat_1(X2,X3))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t8_relset_2) ).

fof(t48_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t48_xboole_1) ).

fof(t19_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
        & r1_tarski(X1,X3) )
     => r1_tarski(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t19_xboole_1) ).

fof(t50_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( v1_relat_1(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( v1_relat_1(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( v1_relat_1(X4)
                 => ( ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
                      & r1_tarski(X3,X4) )
                   => r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(X1,X3),k5_relat_1(X2,X4)) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t50_relat_1) ).

fof(t3_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X2)
     => ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
       => v1_relat_1(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t3_relat_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t2_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] : k3_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0) = k1_xboole_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t2_boole) ).

fof(t36_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t36_xboole_1) ).

fof(t49_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : k3_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3)) = k4_xboole_0(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t49_xboole_1) ).

fof(t3_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] : k4_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t3_boole) ).

fof(t37_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( k4_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k1_xboole_0
    <=> r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( v1_relat_1(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( v1_relat_1(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( v1_relat_1(X3)
               => r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),k3_xboole_0(k5_relat_1(X1,X3),k5_relat_1(X2,X3))) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t8_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( v1_relat_1(esk1_0)
    & v1_relat_1(esk2_0)
    & v1_relat_1(esk3_0)
    & ~ r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),k3_xboole_0(k5_relat_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k5_relat_1(esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X195,X196] : k4_xboole_0(X195,k4_xboole_0(X195,X196)) = k3_xboole_0(X195,X196),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X155,X156,X157] :
      ( ~ r1_tarski(X155,X156)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X155,X157)
      | r1_tarski(X155,k3_xboole_0(X156,X157)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t19_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),k3_xboole_0(k5_relat_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k5_relat_1(esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X439,X440,X441,X442] :
      ( ~ v1_relat_1(X439)
      | ~ v1_relat_1(X440)
      | ~ v1_relat_1(X441)
      | ~ v1_relat_1(X442)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X439,X440)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X441,X442)
      | r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(X439,X441),k5_relat_1(X440,X442)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t50_relat_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X86,X87] :
      ( ~ v1_relat_1(X87)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X86,X87)
      | v1_relat_1(X86) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0)),esk3_0),k4_xboole_0(k5_relat_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k4_xboole_0(k5_relat_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k5_relat_1(esk2_0,esk3_0)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,k4_xboole_0(X2,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3)))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(X1,X3),k5_relat_1(X2,X4))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X4)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X61] : r1_tarski(X61,X61),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X146] : k3_xboole_0(X146,k1_xboole_0) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_boole]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0)),esk3_0),k5_relat_1(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0)),esk3_0),k5_relat_1(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(X1,X2),k5_relat_1(X3,X4))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X4)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X4)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X1200,X1201] : r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1200,X1201),X1200),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t36_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X197,X198,X199] : k3_xboole_0(X197,k4_xboole_0(X198,X199)) = k4_xboole_0(k3_xboole_0(X197,X198),X199),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t49_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    k3_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X1186] : k4_xboole_0(X1186,k1_xboole_0) = X1186,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t3_boole]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1_tarski(k5_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0)),esk3_0),k5_relat_1(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0)),esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X1202,X1203] :
      ( ( k4_xboole_0(X1202,X1203) != k1_xboole_0
        | r1_tarski(X1202,X1203) )
      & ( ~ r1_tarski(X1202,X1203)
        | k4_xboole_0(X1202,X1203) = k1_xboole_0 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    k3_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3)) = k4_xboole_0(k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0)) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    k4_xboole_0(X1,k1_xboole_0) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,k4_xboole_0(esk1_0,esk2_0)),esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_36]),c_0_30]),c_0_37])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | k4_xboole_0(X1,X2) != k1_xboole_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3))) = k4_xboole_0(k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    k4_xboole_0(X1,X1) = k1_xboole_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_41]),c_0_45])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SEU418+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 08:01:56 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.95/5.11  Running first-order model finding
% 4.95/5.11  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fpYNwED6Ha/E---3.1_20868.p
% 30.25/10.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 30.25/10.53  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMLLLSSSNFFN.
% 30.25/10.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 897s (3) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 299s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 21609 completed with status 0
% 30.25/10.53  # Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 30.25/10.53  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMLLLSSSNFFN.
% 30.25/10.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 897s (3) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 299s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 30.25/10.53  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 30.25/10.53  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 21610 completed with status 0
% 30.25/10.53  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 30.25/10.53  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMLLLSSSNFFN.
% 30.25/10.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 897s (3) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 299s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 30.25/10.53  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 30.25/10.53  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 30.25/10.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 30.25/10.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.103 s
% 30.25/10.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 30.25/10.53  
% 30.25/10.53  # Proof found!
% 30.25/10.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 30.25/10.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 30.27/10.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 71086
% 30.27/10.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 70085
% 30.27/10.53  # Initial clauses                      : 2082
% 30.27/10.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 46
% 30.27/10.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2036
% 30.27/10.53  # Processed clauses                    : 4031
% 30.27/10.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 32
% 30.27/10.53  # ...subsumed                          : 200
% 30.27/10.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3799
% 30.27/10.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 870
% 30.27/10.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 30.27/10.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 7
% 30.27/10.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 30.27/10.53  # Generated clauses                    : 72350
% 30.27/10.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 68695
% 30.27/10.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 30.27/10.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 139
% 30.27/10.53  # Paramodulations                      : 71422
% 30.27/10.53  # Factorizations                       : 29
% 30.27/10.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 30.27/10.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 907
% 30.27/10.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 16520
% 30.27/10.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 30.27/10.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 30.27/10.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 30.27/10.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 30.27/10.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 30.27/10.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1801
% 30.27/10.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 215
% 30.27/10.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 30.27/10.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 51
% 30.27/10.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1530
% 30.27/10.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 68482
% 30.27/10.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 401626
% 30.27/10.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 30.27/10.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1822
% 30.27/10.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1765785
% 30.27/10.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 171922
% 30.27/10.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 318
% 30.27/10.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15354
% 30.27/10.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 30.27/10.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 238
% 30.27/10.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 104
% 30.27/10.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 30.27/10.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 30.27/10.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4279547
% 30.27/10.53  
% 30.27/10.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 30.27/10.53  # User time                : 3.026 s
% 30.27/10.53  # System time              : 0.245 s
% 30.27/10.53  # Total time               : 3.271 s
% 30.27/10.53  # Maximum resident set size: 146392 pages
% 30.27/10.53  
% 30.27/10.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 30.27/10.53  # User time                : 4.945 s
% 30.27/10.53  # System time              : 0.328 s
% 30.27/10.53  # Total time               : 5.274 s
% 30.27/10.53  # Maximum resident set size: 117688 pages
% 30.27/10.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------