TSTP Solution File: SEU417+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU417+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:19:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.76s 202.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  50   ~;  42   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   90 (   4 sgn  54   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(redefinition_k5_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
        & m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) )
     => k5_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k3_xboole_0(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+7.ax',redefinition_k5_subset_1) ).

fof(t48_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t48_xboole_1) ).

fof(t7_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
     => ! [X3] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
         => r1_tarski(k5_subset_1(X1,k8_setfam_1(X1,X2),k8_setfam_1(X1,X3)),k8_setfam_1(X1,k1_relset_2(X1,X2,X3))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t7_relset_2) ).

fof(t109_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
     => r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t109_xboole_1) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    <=> r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t3_subset) ).

fof(t59_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
     => ! [X3] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
         => ( r1_tarski(X2,X3)
           => r1_tarski(k8_setfam_1(X1,X3),k8_setfam_1(X1,X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+8.ax',t59_setfam_1) ).

fof(t1_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
        & r1_tarski(X2,X3) )
     => r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t1_xboole_1) ).

fof(dt_k8_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
     => m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+8.ax',dt_k8_setfam_1) ).

fof(redefinition_k1_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
        & m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) )
     => k1_relset_2(X1,X2,X3) = k3_xboole_0(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k1_relset_2) ).

fof(t36_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t36_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
      | k5_subset_1(X4,X5,X6) = k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k5_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : k4_xboole_0(X3,k4_xboole_0(X3,X4)) = k3_xboole_0(X3,X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
       => ! [X3] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
           => r1_tarski(k5_subset_1(X1,k8_setfam_1(X1,X2),k8_setfam_1(X1,X3)),k8_setfam_1(X1,k1_relset_2(X1,X2,X3))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t7_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ r1_tarski(X4,X5)
      | r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X4,X6),X5) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t109_xboole_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( k5_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)))
    & m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)))
    & ~ r1_tarski(k5_subset_1(esk1_0,k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk3_0)),k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( k5_subset_1(X1,X2,X3) = k4_xboole_0(X2,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X4))
        | r1_tarski(X3,X4) )
      & ( ~ r1_tarski(X3,X4)
        | m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X4)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k5_subset_1(esk1_0,k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk3_0)),k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k5_subset_1(X1,X2,X3),X4)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X4) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
      | ~ r1_tarski(X5,X6)
      | r1_tarski(k8_setfam_1(X4,X6),k8_setfam_1(X4,X5)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t59_setfam_1])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ r1_tarski(X4,X5)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X5,X6)
      | r1_tarski(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k8_setfam_1(X1,X2),k8_setfam_1(X1,X3))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    r1_tarski(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X3)))
      | m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(X3,X4),k1_zfmisc_1(X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k8_setfam_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X5,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X4)))
      | k1_relset_2(X4,X5,X6) = k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k1_relset_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_subset_1(k8_setfam_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( k1_relset_2(X1,X2,X3) = k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

fof(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X3,X4),X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t36_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k1_relset_2(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_35]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( k1_relset_2(X1,X2,X3) = k4_xboole_0(X2,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k1_zfmisc_1(X1))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_36]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU417+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:31:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.61/23.63  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.61/23.64  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.61/23.64  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.61/23.64  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.77/46.65  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.77/46.66  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.77/46.66  
% 0.77/46.66  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.91/69.68  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.91/69.69  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.91/69.69  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.91/69.72  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.03/92.72  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.03/92.75  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.03/92.78  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.03/92.81  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/115.77  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/115.79  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/115.80  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/115.83  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/138.79  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/138.81  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/138.85  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/138.85  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/161.83  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/161.83  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/161.87  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.49/161.87  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/184.87  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/184.88  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/184.88  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/184.89  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.916 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.125 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.805 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f8b0f932169414d689b89e2a8b18d4600533b975 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 1.209 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_fc511518e5f98a6b2c7baef820b71b6d1abb3e55 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,02,80,1.0)
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.170 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_95b56b3f38545d2cfee43b45856d192a814b65d5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.669 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6017f334107ca4679a9978dd19d7c76a8bd36e48 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.099 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29f46a864b4eba32a7d0333eeab34cc2a3bfeeb2 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.76/202.93  # OLD status Res
% 1.76/202.93  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,04,500,1.0)
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.106 s
% 1.76/202.93  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c6e328223588bd61ac14315e52cd57432d78a40 for 23 seconds:
% 1.76/202.93  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,04,20000,1.0)
% 1.76/202.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.121 s
% 1.76/202.93  
% 1.76/202.93  # Proof found!
% 1.76/202.93  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.76/202.93  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object total steps             : 45
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object clause steps            : 24
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object formula steps           : 21
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object conjectures             : 14
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 1.76/202.94  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 1.76/202.94  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.76/202.94  # Parsed axioms                        : 4475
% 1.76/202.94  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3705
% 1.76/202.94  # Initial clauses                      : 1327
% 1.76/202.94  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 29
% 1.76/202.94  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1298
% 1.76/202.94  # Processed clauses                    : 28538
% 1.76/202.94  # ...of these trivial                  : 306
% 1.76/202.94  # ...subsumed                          : 19472
% 1.76/202.94  # ...remaining for further processing  : 8760
% 1.76/202.94  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 771
% 1.76/202.94  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 660021
% 1.76/202.94  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1133
% 1.76/202.94  # Backward-rewritten                   : 127
% 1.76/202.94  # Generated clauses                    : 910985
% 1.76/202.94  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 838906
% 1.76/202.94  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 9775
% 1.76/202.94  # Paramodulations                      : 909878
% 1.76/202.94  # Factorizations                       : 49
% 1.76/202.94  # Equation resolutions                 : 1059
% 1.76/202.94  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7486
% 1.76/202.94  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 372
% 1.76/202.94  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 1.76/202.94  #    Negative unit clauses             : 254
% 1.76/202.94  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6843
% 1.76/202.94  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 118908
% 1.76/202.94  # ...number of literals in the above   : 480518
% 1.76/202.94  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.76/202.94  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1262
% 1.76/202.94  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18780284
% 1.76/202.94  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12419276
% 1.76/202.94  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 25081
% 1.76/202.94  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 185876
% 1.76/202.94  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.76/202.94  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1186
% 1.76/202.94  # BW rewrite match successes           : 345
% 1.76/202.94  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.76/202.94  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.76/202.94  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10989148
% 1.76/202.94  
% 1.76/202.94  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.76/202.94  # User time                : 17.207 s
% 1.76/202.94  # System time              : 0.140 s
% 1.76/202.94  # Total time               : 17.347 s
% 1.76/202.94  # Maximum resident set size: 154584 pages
% 1.76/207.88  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.76/207.90  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.76/207.90  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.90  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.76/207.90  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.91  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.76/207.91  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.92  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.76/207.92  
% 1.76/207.93  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.76/207.93  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.93  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.76/207.93  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.94  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.76/207.94  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.94  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.76/207.94  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.94  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.76/207.94  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.76/207.95  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.76/207.95  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------