TSTP Solution File: SEU413+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU413+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:19:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 24.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 113 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 129 ( 47 ~; 43 |; 21 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 17 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 0 sgn 30 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t23_latsum_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( l1_orders_2(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( l1_orders_2(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
=> ! [X4] :
( m1_subset_1(X4,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
=> ( ( v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
& m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
& r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2),X3,X4)
& r2_hidden(X4,u1_struct_0(X1)) )
=> r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t23_latsum_1) ).
fof(t21_latsum_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( l1_orders_2(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( l1_orders_2(X2)
=> ! [X3,X4] :
( ( v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
& m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
& r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X3,X4),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
& r2_hidden(X4,u1_struct_0(X1)) )
=> r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t21_latsum_1) ).
fof(t48_xboole_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t48_xboole_1) ).
fof(d9_orders_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( l1_orders_2(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1))
=> ! [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
=> ( r1_orders_2(X1,X2,X3)
<=> r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X2,X3),u1_orders_2(X1)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+218.ax',d9_orders_2) ).
fof(dt_k1_latsum_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( l1_orders_2(X1)
& l1_orders_2(X2) )
=> ( v1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))
& l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_latsum_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( l1_orders_2(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( l1_orders_2(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
=> ! [X4] :
( m1_subset_1(X4,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
=> ( ( v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
& m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
& r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2),X3,X4)
& r2_hidden(X4,u1_struct_0(X1)) )
=> r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t23_latsum_1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ~ l1_orders_2(X5)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X6)
| ~ v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X5),u1_struct_0(X6)),X6)
| ~ m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X5),u1_struct_0(X6)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X6)))
| ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X7,X8),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X5,X6)))
| ~ r2_hidden(X8,u1_struct_0(X5))
| r2_hidden(X7,u1_struct_0(X5)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t21_latsum_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X3,X4] : k4_xboole_0(X3,k4_xboole_0(X3,X4)) = k3_xboole_0(X3,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( l1_orders_2(esk1_0)
& l1_orders_2(esk2_0)
& m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
& m1_subset_1(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
& v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),esk2_0)
& m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0)))
& r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0,esk4_0)
& r2_hidden(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
& ~ r2_hidden(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(X2))
| ~ r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X2))
| ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X1,X3),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X2,X4)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X4)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X4)))
| ~ v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X4)),X4)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X4)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(X2))
| ~ l1_orders_2(X4)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X2))
| ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X1,X3),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X2,X4)))
| ~ v12_waybel_0(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X4))),X4)
| ~ m1_subset_1(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X4))),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X4))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
v12_waybel_0(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
l1_orders_2(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
l1_orders_2(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ r1_orders_2(X4,X5,X6)
| r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X5,X6),u1_orders_2(X4))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X6,u1_struct_0(X4))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,u1_struct_0(X4))
| ~ l1_orders_2(X4) )
& ( ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X5,X6),u1_orders_2(X4))
| r1_orders_2(X4,X5,X6)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X6,u1_struct_0(X4))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X5,u1_struct_0(X4))
| ~ l1_orders_2(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d9_orders_2])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
| ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X1,X2),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X2,X3),u1_orders_2(X1))
| ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
| ~ r1_orders_2(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
| ~ r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1,X2)
| ~ l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
| ~ r2_hidden(X2,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
r2_hidden(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_hidden(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( v1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X3,X4))
| ~ l1_orders_2(X3)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X4) )
& ( l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X3,X4))
| ~ l1_orders_2(X3)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_latsum_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X2,X1))
| ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_16]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SEU413+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 12:49:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.56/23.63 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/23.63 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/23.63 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/23.64 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/24.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/24.74
% 0.56/24.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.56/24.74 # OLD status Res
% 0.56/24.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.953 s
% 0.56/24.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 0.56/24.74 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/24.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.219 s
% 0.56/24.74
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof found!
% 0.56/24.74 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.56/24.74 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object total steps : 31
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object clause steps : 20
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object conjectures : 18
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object clause conjectures : 15
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.56/24.74 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 16
% 0.56/24.74 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.56/24.74 # Parsed axioms : 4460
% 0.56/24.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3921
% 0.56/24.74 # Initial clauses : 1201
% 0.56/24.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 24
% 0.56/24.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1177
% 0.56/24.74 # Processed clauses : 1999
% 0.56/24.74 # ...of these trivial : 74
% 0.56/24.74 # ...subsumed : 507
% 0.56/24.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 1418
% 0.56/24.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 130
% 0.56/24.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/24.74 # Backward-subsumed : 10
% 0.56/24.74 # Backward-rewritten : 41
% 0.56/24.74 # Generated clauses : 23420
% 0.56/24.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 21009
% 0.56/24.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 139
% 0.56/24.74 # Paramodulations : 23229
% 0.56/24.74 # Factorizations : 19
% 0.56/24.74 # Equation resolutions : 175
% 0.56/24.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 1349
% 0.56/24.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 160
% 0.56/24.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.56/24.74 # Negative unit clauses : 41
% 0.56/24.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 1145
% 0.56/24.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17732
% 0.56/24.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 92638
% 0.56/24.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/24.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 52
% 0.56/24.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 505082
% 0.56/24.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 91153
% 0.56/24.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 594
% 0.56/24.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23421
% 0.56/24.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/24.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 196
% 0.56/24.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 46
% 0.56/24.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/24.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/24.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 565235
% 0.56/24.74
% 0.56/24.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/24.74 # User time : 0.870 s
% 0.56/24.74 # System time : 0.024 s
% 0.56/24.74 # Total time : 0.894 s
% 0.56/24.74 # Maximum resident set size: 30700 pages
% 0.56/46.65 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.65 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.66 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.70 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/46.71 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.56/46.72 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.56/46.72 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------