TSTP Solution File: SEU411+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU411+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:19:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.81s 8.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 136 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 145 ( 43 ~; 33 |; 59 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 14 ( 12 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 5 sgn 28 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t20_latsum_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v2_orders_2(X1)
& v3_orders_2(X1)
& v4_orders_2(X1)
& v1_yellow_0(X1)
& v1_lattice3(X1)
& l1_orders_2(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X2)
& v2_orders_2(X2)
& v3_orders_2(X2)
& v4_orders_2(X2)
& v1_yellow_0(X2)
& v1_lattice3(X2)
& l1_orders_2(X2) )
=> ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)))
& v1_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
& v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
& m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) )
=> r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t20_latsum_1) ).
fof(t48_xboole_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t48_xboole_1) ).
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : k3_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k3_xboole_0(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).
fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( r2_hidden(X4,X3)
<=> ( r2_hidden(X4,X1)
& r2_hidden(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d3_xboole_0) ).
fof(t10_waybel12,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v4_orders_2(X1)
& v1_yellow_0(X1)
& l1_orders_2(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
& v12_waybel_0(X2,X1)
& m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) )
=> r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(X1),X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+506.ax',t10_waybel12) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
& v2_orders_2(X1)
& v3_orders_2(X1)
& v4_orders_2(X1)
& v1_yellow_0(X1)
& v1_lattice3(X1)
& l1_orders_2(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X2)
& v2_orders_2(X2)
& v3_orders_2(X2)
& v4_orders_2(X2)
& v1_yellow_0(X2)
& v1_lattice3(X2)
& l1_orders_2(X2) )
=> ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)))
& v1_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
& v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
& m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2))) )
=> r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t20_latsum_1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
& v2_orders_2(esk1_0)
& v3_orders_2(esk1_0)
& v4_orders_2(esk1_0)
& v1_yellow_0(esk1_0)
& v1_lattice3(esk1_0)
& l1_orders_2(esk1_0)
& ~ v3_struct_0(esk2_0)
& v2_orders_2(esk2_0)
& v3_orders_2(esk2_0)
& v4_orders_2(esk2_0)
& v1_yellow_0(esk2_0)
& v1_lattice3(esk2_0)
& l1_orders_2(esk2_0)
& ~ v1_xboole_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)))
& v1_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),esk2_0)
& v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),esk2_0)
& m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0)))
& ~ r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X3,X4] : k4_xboole_0(X3,k4_xboole_0(X3,X4)) = k3_xboole_0(X3,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] : k3_xboole_0(X3,X4) = k3_xboole_0(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( r2_hidden(X8,X5)
| ~ r2_hidden(X8,X7)
| X7 != k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) )
& ( r2_hidden(X8,X6)
| ~ r2_hidden(X8,X7)
| X7 != k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ r2_hidden(X8,X5)
| ~ r2_hidden(X8,X6)
| r2_hidden(X8,X7)
| X7 != k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ r2_hidden(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ~ r2_hidden(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| ~ r2_hidden(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) )
& ( r2_hidden(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| r2_hidden(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) )
& ( r2_hidden(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| r2_hidden(esk13_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = k3_xboole_0(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
k3_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k3_xboole_0(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( r2_hidden(X4,X3)
| X1 != k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)
| ~ r2_hidden(X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( v3_struct_0(X3)
| ~ v4_orders_2(X3)
| ~ v1_yellow_0(X3)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X3)
| v1_xboole_0(X4)
| ~ v12_waybel_0(X4,X3)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X3)))
| r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(X3),X4) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t10_waybel12])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
v12_waybel_0(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k4_xboole_0(X2,k4_xboole_0(X2,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( r2_hidden(X4,X3)
| X1 != k4_xboole_0(X2,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3))
| ~ r2_hidden(X4,X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(X1),X2)
| v1_xboole_0(X2)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ v12_waybel_0(X2,X1)
| ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
| ~ v1_yellow_0(X1)
| ~ v4_orders_2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
v12_waybel_0(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
v1_yellow_0(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
v4_orders_2(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
l1_orders_2(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,k4_xboole_0(X3,k4_xboole_0(X3,X2))) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(esk2_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),k4_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_hidden(k3_yellow_0(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU411+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:28:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.81/8.00 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 3.81/8.00 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 3.81/8.00 # Preprocessing time : 3.144 s
% 3.81/8.00
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof found!
% 3.81/8.00 # SZS status Theorem
% 3.81/8.00 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object total steps : 34
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object clause steps : 23
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object conjectures : 19
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object clause conjectures : 16
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 3.81/8.00 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 18
% 3.81/8.00 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 3.81/8.00 # Parsed axioms : 66056
% 3.81/8.00 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 65955
% 3.81/8.00 # Initial clauses : 155
% 3.81/8.00 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 3.81/8.00 # Initial clauses in saturation : 152
% 3.81/8.00 # Processed clauses : 955
% 3.81/8.00 # ...of these trivial : 72
% 3.81/8.00 # ...subsumed : 392
% 3.81/8.00 # ...remaining for further processing : 491
% 3.81/8.00 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 10
% 3.81/8.00 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.81/8.00 # Backward-subsumed : 17
% 3.81/8.00 # Backward-rewritten : 44
% 3.81/8.00 # Generated clauses : 19462
% 3.81/8.00 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 15054
% 3.81/8.00 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 150
% 3.81/8.00 # Paramodulations : 19443
% 3.81/8.00 # Factorizations : 6
% 3.81/8.00 # Equation resolutions : 13
% 3.81/8.00 # Current number of processed clauses : 429
% 3.81/8.00 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 112
% 3.81/8.00 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 3.81/8.00 # Negative unit clauses : 25
% 3.81/8.00 # Non-unit-clauses : 282
% 3.81/8.00 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10140
% 3.81/8.00 # ...number of literals in the above : 18660
% 3.81/8.00 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.81/8.00 # Current number of archived clauses : 62
% 3.81/8.00 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29560
% 3.81/8.00 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21067
% 3.81/8.00 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 399
% 3.81/8.00 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2131
% 3.81/8.00 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.81/8.00 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1660
% 3.81/8.00 # BW rewrite match successes : 277
% 3.81/8.00 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.81/8.00 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.81/8.00 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2719623
% 3.81/8.00
% 3.81/8.00 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.81/8.00 # User time : 3.850 s
% 3.81/8.00 # System time : 0.142 s
% 3.81/8.00 # Total time : 3.992 s
% 3.81/8.00 # Maximum resident set size: 166960 pages
% 3.81/26.98 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.81/26.99 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.81/27.06 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.06 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.06 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.06 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.07 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.08 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.09 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.09 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.10 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.10 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.81/27.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/27.11 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------