TSTP Solution File: SEU408+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : SEU408+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:03:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 194.83s 191.35s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.12 % Problem : SEU408+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.01/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 12:46:15 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 15.90/15.50 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 15.90/15.50 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 15.90/15.50 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 31.61/30.97 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 31.61/30.97 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 31.61/30.97 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.35/46.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.35/46.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.35/46.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 71.37/70.08 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 71.37/70.08 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 71.37/70.08 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 87.31/86.29 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 87.31/86.29 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 87.31/86.29 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 103.19/101.67 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 103.19/101.67 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 103.19/101.67 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 136.66/134.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 136.66/134.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 136.66/134.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 194.79/190.87 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 194.79/190.87 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 194.79/190.87 Peak sizes were: global stack 129176 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 194.83/191.35 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------