TSTP Solution File: SEU408+2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SEU408+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:32:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 92.13s 12.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 92.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  142 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  167 (  56   ~;  52   |;  45   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   5 sgn;  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = k2_xboole_0(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( r2_hidden(X4,X3)
        <=> ( r2_hidden(X4,X1)
            | r2_hidden(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WNiw3VIuGI/E---3.1_12825.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t11_latsum_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_orders_2(X1)
        & v3_orders_2(X1)
        & v4_orders_2(X1)
        & v1_lattice3(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X2)
            & v2_orders_2(X2)
            & v3_orders_2(X2)
            & v4_orders_2(X2)
            & v1_lattice3(X2)
            & l1_orders_2(X2) )
         => ! [X3] :
              ( r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X2))
             => m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WNiw3VIuGI/E---3.1_12825.p',t11_latsum_1) ).

fof(d2_latsum_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( l1_orders_2(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( l1_orders_2(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ( v1_orders_2(X3)
                & l1_orders_2(X3) )
             => ( X3 = k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)
              <=> ( u1_struct_0(X3) = k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2))
                  & u1_orders_2(X3) = k2_xboole_0(k2_xboole_0(u1_orders_2(X1),u1_orders_2(X2)),k7_relset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X2),u1_orders_2(X1),u1_orders_2(X2))) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WNiw3VIuGI/E---3.1_12825.p',d2_latsum_1) ).

fof(dt_k1_latsum_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( l1_orders_2(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X2) )
     => ( v1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))
        & l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WNiw3VIuGI/E---3.1_12825.p',dt_k1_latsum_1) ).

fof(t1_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
     => m1_subset_1(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WNiw3VIuGI/E---3.1_12825.p',t1_subset) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WNiw3VIuGI/E---3.1_12825.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X142,X143,X144,X145,X146,X147,X148,X149] :
      ( ( ~ r2_hidden(X145,X144)
        | r2_hidden(X145,X142)
        | r2_hidden(X145,X143)
        | X144 != k2_xboole_0(X142,X143) )
      & ( ~ r2_hidden(X146,X142)
        | r2_hidden(X146,X144)
        | X144 != k2_xboole_0(X142,X143) )
      & ( ~ r2_hidden(X146,X143)
        | r2_hidden(X146,X144)
        | X144 != k2_xboole_0(X142,X143) )
      & ( ~ r2_hidden(esk19_3(X147,X148,X149),X147)
        | ~ r2_hidden(esk19_3(X147,X148,X149),X149)
        | X149 = k2_xboole_0(X147,X148) )
      & ( ~ r2_hidden(esk19_3(X147,X148,X149),X148)
        | ~ r2_hidden(esk19_3(X147,X148,X149),X149)
        | X149 = k2_xboole_0(X147,X148) )
      & ( r2_hidden(esk19_3(X147,X148,X149),X149)
        | r2_hidden(esk19_3(X147,X148,X149),X147)
        | r2_hidden(esk19_3(X147,X148,X149),X148)
        | X149 = k2_xboole_0(X147,X148) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v2_orders_2(X1)
          & v3_orders_2(X1)
          & v4_orders_2(X1)
          & v1_lattice3(X1)
          & l1_orders_2(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X2)
              & v2_orders_2(X2)
              & v3_orders_2(X2)
              & v4_orders_2(X2)
              & v1_lattice3(X2)
              & l1_orders_2(X2) )
           => ! [X3] :
                ( r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X2))
               => m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t11_latsum_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X75,X76,X77] :
      ( ( u1_struct_0(X77) = k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X75),u1_struct_0(X76))
        | X77 != k1_latsum_1(X75,X76)
        | ~ v1_orders_2(X77)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X77)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X76)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X75) )
      & ( u1_orders_2(X77) = k2_xboole_0(k2_xboole_0(u1_orders_2(X75),u1_orders_2(X76)),k7_relset_1(u1_struct_0(X75),u1_struct_0(X75),u1_struct_0(X76),u1_struct_0(X76),u1_orders_2(X75),u1_orders_2(X76)))
        | X77 != k1_latsum_1(X75,X76)
        | ~ v1_orders_2(X77)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X77)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X76)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X75) )
      & ( u1_struct_0(X77) != k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X75),u1_struct_0(X76))
        | u1_orders_2(X77) != k2_xboole_0(k2_xboole_0(u1_orders_2(X75),u1_orders_2(X76)),k7_relset_1(u1_struct_0(X75),u1_struct_0(X75),u1_struct_0(X76),u1_struct_0(X76),u1_orders_2(X75),u1_orders_2(X76)))
        | X77 = k1_latsum_1(X75,X76)
        | ~ v1_orders_2(X77)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X77)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X76)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X75) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_latsum_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] :
      ( ( v1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X73,X74))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X73)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X74) )
      & ( l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X73,X74))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X73)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X74) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_latsum_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,X3)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2)
    | X3 != k2_xboole_0(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v2_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & v3_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & v4_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & v1_lattice3(esk1_0)
    & l1_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & ~ v3_struct_0(esk2_0)
    & v2_orders_2(esk2_0)
    & v3_orders_2(esk2_0)
    & v4_orders_2(esk2_0)
    & v1_lattice3(esk2_0)
    & l1_orders_2(esk2_0)
    & r2_hidden(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk2_0))
    & ~ m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( u1_struct_0(X1) = k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X2),u1_struct_0(X3))
    | X1 != k1_latsum_1(X2,X3)
    | ~ v1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X3)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( v1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X43,X44] :
      ( ~ r2_hidden(X43,X44)
      | m1_subset_1(X43,X44) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,k2_xboole_0(X2,X3))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    r2_hidden(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)) = k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X2)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    l1_orders_2(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1751,X1752] : k2_xboole_0(X1751,X1752) = k2_xboole_0(X1752,X1751),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    r2_hidden(esk3_0,k2_xboole_0(X1,u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,X1)) = k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    l1_orders_2(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k2_xboole_0(X1,u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)) = k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k2_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk2_0),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SEU408+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:54:51 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.60/0.79  Running first-order model finding
% 0.60/0.79  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WNiw3VIuGI/E---3.1_12825.p
% 92.13/12.56  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 92.13/12.56  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 92.13/12.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with 300s (1) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # sh5l with pid 12905 completed with status 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Result found by sh5l
% 92.13/12.56  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 92.13/12.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 92.13/12.56  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 92.13/12.56  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 23s (1) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 12914 completed with status 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 92.13/12.56  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 92.13/12.56  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 92.13/12.56  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 92.13/12.56  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 92.13/12.56  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 23s (1) cores
% 92.13/12.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.144 s
% 92.13/12.56  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 92.13/12.56  
% 92.13/12.56  # Proof found!
% 92.13/12.56  # SZS status Theorem
% 92.13/12.56  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 92.13/12.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 4448
% 92.13/12.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1338
% 92.13/12.56  # Initial clauses                      : 7221
% 92.13/12.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 165
% 92.13/12.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7056
% 92.13/12.56  # Processed clauses                    : 26446
% 92.13/12.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 541
% 92.13/12.56  # ...subsumed                          : 9596
% 92.13/12.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 16309
% 92.13/12.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 852
% 92.13/12.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 101
% 92.13/12.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 381
% 92.13/12.56  # Generated clauses                    : 92204
% 92.13/12.56  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 85778
% 92.13/12.56  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 508
% 92.13/12.56  # Paramodulations                      : 91403
% 92.13/12.56  # Factorizations                       : 5
% 92.13/12.56  # NegExts                              : 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 868
% 92.13/12.56  # Total rewrite steps                  : 35434
% 92.13/12.56  # Propositional unsat checks           : 4
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional check models        : 2
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.213
% 92.13/12.56  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.202
% 92.13/12.56  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 92.13/12.56  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 92.13/12.56  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 92.13/12.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8669
% 92.13/12.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3090
% 92.13/12.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 92.13/12.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2520
% 92.13/12.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3052
% 92.13/12.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72557
% 92.13/12.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 158493
% 92.13/12.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6947
% 92.13/12.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20506463
% 92.13/12.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1434500
% 92.13/12.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1408
% 92.13/12.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2313323
% 92.13/12.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 92.13/12.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1639
% 92.13/12.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 503
% 92.13/12.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 92.13/12.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2174604
% 92.13/12.56  
% 92.13/12.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 92.13/12.56  # User time                : 11.264 s
% 92.13/12.56  # System time              : 0.162 s
% 92.13/12.56  # Total time               : 11.426 s
% 92.13/12.56  # Maximum resident set size: 33288 pages
% 92.13/12.56  
% 92.13/12.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 92.13/12.56  # User time                : 11.399 s
% 92.13/12.56  # System time              : 0.172 s
% 92.13/12.56  # Total time               : 11.571 s
% 92.13/12.56  # Maximum resident set size: 7280 pages
% 92.13/12.56  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------