TSTP Solution File: SEU382+2 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SEU382+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 12:40:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.12s 2.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  32 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (  69 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  26   ~;  20   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  14   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(redefinition_k1_pcomps_1,axiom,
    ! [A] : k1_pcomps_1(A) = powerset(A) ).

fof(t1_yellow_1,lemma,
    ! [A] :
      ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(A)) = A
      & the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(A)) = inclusion_order(A) ) ).

fof(t4_waybel_7,conjecture,
    ! [A] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(A)) = powerset(A) ).

fof(t4_yellow_1,lemma,
    ! [A] : boole_POSet(A) = incl_POSet(powerset(A)) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ! [A] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(A)) = powerset(A),
    inference(strip,[],[t4_waybel_7]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ! [A] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(A)) = powerset(A),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ? [A] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(A)) != powerset(A),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) != powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ! [A] : k1_pcomps_1(A) = powerset(A),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[redefinition_k1_pcomps_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [A] : k1_pcomps_1(A) = powerset(A),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ( ! [A] : the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(A)) = inclusion_order(A)
    & ! [A] : the_carrier(incl_POSet(A)) = A ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[t1_yellow_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [A] : the_carrier(incl_POSet(A)) = A,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

fof(normalize_0_6,plain,
    ! [A] : the_carrier(incl_POSet(A)) = A,
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

fof(normalize_0_7,plain,
    ! [A] : boole_POSet(A) = incl_POSet(powerset(A)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[t4_yellow_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_8,plain,
    ! [A] : boole_POSet(A) = incl_POSet(powerset(A)),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) != powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    k1_pcomps_1(A) = powerset(A),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    X = X,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( X != X
    | X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) ),[0],$fot(Y)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( k1_pcomps_1(A) != powerset(A)
    | powerset(A) = k1_pcomps_1(A) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X,$fot(k1_pcomps_1(A))),bind(Y,$fot(powerset(A)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    powerset(A) = k1_pcomps_1(A),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(k1_pcomps_1(A),powerset(A)) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) = k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_6:[bind(A,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) = powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)),powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) ),[1],$fot(k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) = powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)),powerset(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    the_carrier(incl_POSet(A)) = A,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    the_carrier(incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))) = k1_pcomps_1(X_103),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(A,$fot(k1_pcomps_1(X_103)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    boole_POSet(A) = incl_POSet(powerset(A)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    incl_POSet(powerset(A)) = incl_POSet(powerset(A)),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(incl_POSet(powerset(A)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( incl_POSet(powerset(A)) != incl_POSet(powerset(A))
    | powerset(A) != k1_pcomps_1(A)
    | incl_POSet(powerset(A)) = incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(incl_POSet(powerset(A)),incl_POSet(powerset(A))) ),[1,0],$fot(k1_pcomps_1(A))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    ( powerset(A) != k1_pcomps_1(A)
    | incl_POSet(powerset(A)) = incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(incl_POSet(powerset(A)),incl_POSet(powerset(A))) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    incl_POSet(powerset(A)) = incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(powerset(A),k1_pcomps_1(A)) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_16]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( boole_POSet(A) != incl_POSet(powerset(A))
    | incl_POSet(powerset(A)) != incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A))
    | boole_POSet(A) = incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(boole_POSet(A),incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A))) ),[0],$fot(incl_POSet(powerset(A)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( boole_POSet(A) != incl_POSet(powerset(A))
    | boole_POSet(A) = incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(incl_POSet(powerset(A)),incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A))) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_18]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    boole_POSet(A) = incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(A)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(boole_POSet(A),incl_POSet(powerset(A))) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    boole_POSet(X_103) = incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_20:[bind(A,$fot(X_103))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ( boole_POSet(X_103) != incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))
    | incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103)) = boole_POSet(X_103) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X,$fot(boole_POSet(X_103))),bind(Y,$fot(incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103)) = boole_POSet(X_103),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(boole_POSet(X_103),incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_22]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    ( incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103)) != boole_POSet(X_103)
    | the_carrier(incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))) != k1_pcomps_1(X_103)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(X_103)) = k1_pcomps_1(X_103) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(the_carrier(incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))),k1_pcomps_1(X_103)) ),[0,0],$fot(boole_POSet(X_103))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))) != k1_pcomps_1(X_103)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(X_103)) = k1_pcomps_1(X_103) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103)),boole_POSet(X_103)) )],[refute_0_23,refute_0_24]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    the_carrier(boole_POSet(X_103)) = k1_pcomps_1(X_103),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(the_carrier(incl_POSet(k1_pcomps_1(X_103))),k1_pcomps_1(X_103)) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_25]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) = k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_26:[bind(X_103,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    ( k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) = k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)),k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) ),[1],$fot(k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    ( k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)
    | the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) = k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)),k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) )],[refute_0_27,refute_0_28]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) != k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(the_carrier(boole_POSet(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)),k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) )],[refute_0_29,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_31,plain,
    k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49) = k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49),k1_pcomps_1(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_49)) )],[refute_0_31,refute_0_30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU382+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 08:18:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 2.12/2.27  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.12/2.27  
% 2.12/2.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.12/2.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------