TSTP Solution File: SEU382+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SEU382+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:26:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.41s 0.90s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn; 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t4_waybel_7,conjecture,
! [X1] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(X1)) = powerset(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yJbqJ7wV3N/E---3.1_22593.p',t4_waybel_7) ).
fof(t4_yellow_1,lemma,
! [X1] : boole_POSet(X1) = incl_POSet(powerset(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yJbqJ7wV3N/E---3.1_22593.p',t4_yellow_1) ).
fof(t1_yellow_1,lemma,
! [X1] :
( the_carrier(incl_POSet(X1)) = X1
& the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(X1)) = inclusion_order(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yJbqJ7wV3N/E---3.1_22593.p',t1_yellow_1) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(X1)) = powerset(X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t4_waybel_7]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
the_carrier(boole_POSet(esk522_0)) != powerset(esk522_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,lemma,
! [X2450] : boole_POSet(X2450) = incl_POSet(powerset(X2450)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t4_yellow_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
the_carrier(boole_POSet(esk522_0)) != powerset(esk522_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,lemma,
boole_POSet(X1) = incl_POSet(powerset(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,lemma,
! [X2161] :
( the_carrier(incl_POSet(X2161)) = X2161
& the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(X2161)) = inclusion_order(X2161) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t1_yellow_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
the_carrier(incl_POSet(powerset(esk522_0))) != powerset(esk522_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,lemma,
the_carrier(incl_POSet(X1)) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.18 % Problem : SEU382+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.18/0.19 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.18/0.39 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.39 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.18/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 09:19:01 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.40/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yJbqJ7wV3N/E---3.1_22593.p
% 0.41/0.90 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.41/0.90 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.90 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 22672 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.41/0.90 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.90 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.41/0.90 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.90 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 68s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 68s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 22683 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.41/0.90 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.90 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.41/0.90 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.90 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 68s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.90 # Preprocessing time : 0.054 s
% 0.41/0.90 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.41/0.90
% 0.41/0.90 # Proof found!
% 0.41/0.90 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.90 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.90 # Parsed axioms : 843
% 0.41/0.90 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Initial clauses : 3775
% 0.41/0.90 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 145
% 0.41/0.90 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3630
% 0.41/0.90 # Processed clauses : 48
% 0.41/0.90 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.41/0.90 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.41/0.90 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.41/0.90 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # NegExts : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.90 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.90 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.90 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.90 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.90 # Current number of processed clauses : 46
% 0.41/0.90 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.41/0.90 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Negative unit clauses : 32
% 0.41/0.90 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3582
% 0.41/0.90 # ...number of literals in the above : 16820
% 0.41/0.90 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.41/0.90 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 262
% 0.41/0.90 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.41/0.90 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.41/0.90 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/0.90 # Termbank termtop insertions : 216297
% 0.41/0.90
% 0.41/0.90 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.90 # User time : 0.265 s
% 0.41/0.90 # System time : 0.023 s
% 0.41/0.90 # Total time : 0.288 s
% 0.41/0.90 # Maximum resident set size: 11880 pages
% 0.41/0.90
% 0.41/0.90 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.90 # User time : 0.384 s
% 0.41/0.90 # System time : 0.051 s
% 0.41/0.90 # Total time : 0.435 s
% 0.41/0.90 # Maximum resident set size: 2888 pages
% 0.41/0.90 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.41/0.90 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------