TSTP Solution File: SEU377+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU377+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:29:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 24.77s 24.96s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SEU377+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:26:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.40 The process was started by sandbox on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.40 Sun Jun 19 11:26:53 2022
% 0.22/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 16980.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 formula_list(usable).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=14.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.22/0.40 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.22/0.40 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.22/0.40 clauses in usable.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -rel_str(A)|v1_yellow_3(A)| -empty_carrier(A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)|empty_carrier(B)| -net_str(B,A)|function(the_mapping(A,B)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)|empty_carrier(B)| -net_str(B,A)|quasi_total(the_mapping(A,B),the_carrier(B),the_carrier(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -one_sorted_str(A)| -transitive_relstr(B)| -net_str(B,A)|strict_net_str(preimage_subnetstr(A,B,C),A).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)| -empty(the_carrier(A)).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -one_sorted_str(A)|empty(B)| -relation_of2(C,B,B)| -function(D)| -quasi_total(D,B,the_carrier(A))| -relation_of2(D,B,the_carrier(A))|strict_net_str(net_str_of(A,B,C,D),A).
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 149 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 150 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.22/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 181 during input processing: 0 [copy,181,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.40 181 back subsumes 135.
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.81/0.99 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.81/0.99 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.81/0.99 number of clauses in intial UL: 141
% 0.81/0.99 number of clauses initially in problem: 179
% 0.81/0.99 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.81/0.99 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.81/0.99 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.81/0.99 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.81/0.99 distinct predicate count: 26
% 0.81/0.99 distinct function count: 32
% 0.81/0.99 distinct constant count: 15
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99
% 0.81/0.99 =========== start of search ===========
% 8.89/9.08
% 8.89/9.08
% 8.89/9.08 Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 8.89/9.08
% 8.89/9.08 Resetting weight limit to 59 after 160 givens.
% 8.89/9.08
% 9.62/9.81
% 9.62/9.81
% 9.62/9.81 Changing weight limit from 59 to 58.
% 9.62/9.81
% 9.62/9.81 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 165 givens.
% 9.62/9.81
% 10.24/10.43
% 10.24/10.43
% 10.24/10.43 Changing weight limit from 58 to 57.
% 10.24/10.43
% 10.24/10.43 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 170 givens.
% 10.24/10.43
% 11.49/11.67
% 11.49/11.67
% 11.49/11.67 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 11.49/11.67
% 11.49/11.67 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 180 givens.
% 11.49/11.67
% 12.67/12.91
% 12.67/12.91
% 12.67/12.91 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 12.67/12.91
% 12.67/12.91 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 190 givens.
% 12.67/12.91
% 13.90/14.09
% 13.90/14.09
% 13.90/14.09 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 13.90/14.09
% 13.90/14.09 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 200 givens.
% 13.90/14.09
% 15.05/15.26
% 15.05/15.26
% 15.05/15.26 Changing weight limit from 54 to 53.
% 15.05/15.26
% 15.05/15.26 Resetting weight limit to 53 after 210 givens.
% 15.05/15.26
% 15.65/15.87
% 15.65/15.87
% 15.65/15.87 Changing weight limit from 53 to 52.
% 15.65/15.87
% 15.65/15.87 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 215 givens.
% 15.65/15.87
% 16.18/16.38
% 16.18/16.38
% 16.18/16.38 Changing weight limit from 52 to 50.
% 16.18/16.38
% 16.18/16.38 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 220 givens.
% 16.18/16.38
% 16.68/16.91
% 16.68/16.91
% 16.68/16.91 Changing weight limit from 50 to 48.
% 16.68/16.91
% 16.68/16.91 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 225 givens.
% 16.68/16.91
% 17.02/17.24
% 17.02/17.24
% 17.02/17.24 Changing weight limit from 48 to 47.
% 17.02/17.24
% 17.02/17.24 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 230 givens.
% 17.02/17.24
% 17.66/17.87
% 17.66/17.87
% 17.66/17.87 Changing weight limit from 47 to 43.
% 17.66/17.87
% 17.66/17.87 Resetting weight limit to 43 after 235 givens.
% 17.66/17.87
% 17.98/18.20
% 17.98/18.20
% 17.98/18.20 Changing weight limit from 43 to 42.
% 17.98/18.20
% 17.98/18.20 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 240 givens.
% 17.98/18.20
% 18.36/18.56
% 18.36/18.56
% 18.36/18.56 Changing weight limit from 42 to 40.
% 18.36/18.56
% 18.36/18.56 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 245 givens.
% 18.36/18.56
% 18.98/19.18
% 18.98/19.18
% 18.98/19.18 Changing weight limit from 40 to 38.
% 18.98/19.18
% 18.98/19.18 Resetting weight limit to 38 after 255 givens.
% 18.98/19.18
% 19.26/19.51
% 19.26/19.51
% 19.26/19.51 Changing weight limit from 38 to 37.
% 19.26/19.51
% 19.26/19.51 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 260 givens.
% 19.26/19.51
% 19.86/20.08
% 19.86/20.08
% 19.86/20.08 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 19.86/20.08
% 19.86/20.08 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 270 givens.
% 19.86/20.08
% 20.68/20.88
% 20.68/20.88
% 20.68/20.88 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 20.68/20.88
% 20.68/20.88 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 285 givens.
% 20.68/20.88
% 21.60/21.82
% 21.60/21.82
% 21.60/21.82 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 21.60/21.82
% 21.60/21.82 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 305 givens.
% 21.60/21.82
% 23.08/23.26
% 23.08/23.26
% 23.08/23.26 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 23.08/23.26
% 23.08/23.26 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 340 givens.
% 23.08/23.26
% 24.77/24.96
% 24.77/24.96 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 24.77/24.96
% 24.77/24.96 relation_empty_yielding(preimage_subnetstr(A,B,C)).
% 24.77/24.96
% 24.77/24.96 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 24.77/24.96 374 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 11943.2 K.
% 24.77/24.96 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 24.77/24.96 sym_ent ( 304) 191 0 191 0 56.7 K
% 24.77/24.96 term ( 32) 7025306 6999805 25501 17258 1336.2 K
% 24.77/24.96 rel ( 40) 5584879 5540441 44438 39908 3294.8 K
% 24.77/24.96 term_ptr ( 16) 652842 518631 134211 104804 3734.6 K
% 24.77/24.96 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 24.77/24.96 fpa_head ( 24) 12951 3479 9472 64 223.5 K
% 24.77/24.96 fpa_tree ( 56) 750032 750032 0 467 25.5 K
% 24.77/24.96 context (1288) 459335 459335 0 12 15.1 K
% 24.77/24.96 trail ( 24) 19731436 19731436 0 14 0.3 K
% 24.77/24.96 imd_tree ( 32) 214 0 214 0 6.7 K
% 24.77/24.96 imd_pos (4024) 582 582 0 1 3.9 K
% 24.77/24.96 is_tree ( 24) 27761 13989 13772 2523 381.9 K
% 24.77/24.96 is_pos (2424) 7461892 7461892 0 11 26.0 K
% 24.77/24.96 fsub_pos ( 16) 610626 610626 0 1 0.0 K
% 24.77/24.96 literal ( 32) 1184045 1161670 22375 16963 1229.3 K
% 24.77/24.96 clause ( 88) 131830 126106 5724 58 496.9 K
% 24.77/24.96 list ( 272) 96 89 7 2 2.4 K
% 24.77/24.96 clash_nd ( 80) 29460 29460 0 10 0.8 K
% 24.77/24.96 clause_ptr ( 16) 11236 5649 5587 56 88.2 K
% 24.77/24.96 int_ptr ( 16) 789673 743875 45798 3848 775.7 K
% 24.77/24.96 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 24.77/24.96 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 24.77/24.96 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 24.77/24.96 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 24.77/24.96 formula( 40) 1416 1416 0 706 27.6 K
% 24.77/24.96 formula_ptr( 16) 86 86 0 86 1.3 K
% 24.77/24.96 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 24.77/24.96
% 24.77/24.96 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 24.77/24.96 0.00
% 24.77/24.96 new demod time 0.00
% 24.77/24.96 post_process time 0.00
% 24.77/24.96 back demod time 0.00
% 24.77/24.96 back subsume 0.00
% 24.77/24.96 factor time 0.00
% 24.77/24.96 FINDER time 0.00
% 24.77/24.96 unindex time 0.00
% 24.77/24.96
% 24.77/24.96 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 24.77/24.96 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:18 5:14 6:0 7:1 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 24.77/24.96 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:43
% 24.77/24.96 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 24.77/24.96 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:1 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:1
% 24.77/24.96 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:1 49:1 50:0
% 24.77/24.96 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:2 55:0 56:2 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:36
% 24.77/24.96 61:1 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:3 68:18 69:1 70:0
% 24.77/24.96 71:0 72:0 73:2 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 24.77/24.96 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:1 90:1
% 24.77/24.96 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 24.77/24.96 All others: 48961.
% 24.77/24.96
% 24.77/24.96 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 24.77/24.96
% 24.77/24.96 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------