TSTP Solution File: SEU376+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SEU376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:29:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 3.60s 3.78s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU376+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:04:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Mon Jun 20 10:04:07 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 14875.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -rel_str(A)|v1_yellow_3(A)| -empty_carrier(A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)|empty_carrier(B)| -net_str(B,A)|function(the_mapping(A,B)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -one_sorted_str(A)|empty_carrier(B)| -net_str(B,A)|quasi_total(the_mapping(A,B),the_carrier(B),the_carrier(A)).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 84 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 85 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 116 during input processing: 0 [copy,116,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  116 back subsumes 78.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.45  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.45  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.45  number of clauses in intial UL: 77
% 0.19/0.45  number of clauses initially in problem: 115
% 0.19/0.45  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.19/0.45  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 74
% 0.19/0.45  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.19/0.45  absolute distinct symbol count: 58
% 0.19/0.45     distinct predicate count: 22
% 0.19/0.45     distinct function count: 21
% 0.19/0.45     distinct constant count: 15
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 3.60/3.78  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 3.60/3.78  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 3.60/3.78  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 10 [ 5 5 33843 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 12 [ 12 2 10305 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 13 [ 5 1 4801 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  true clauses given           8      (20.0%)
% 3.60/3.78  false clauses given         32
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78        FALSE     TRUE
% 3.60/3.78     2  0         1
% 3.60/3.78     3  0         1
% 3.60/3.78     4  1         11
% 3.60/3.78     5  2         3
% 3.60/3.78     6  0         9
% 3.60/3.78     7  1         2
% 3.60/3.78     8  1         7
% 3.60/3.78     9  0         2
% 3.60/3.78    10  0         2
% 3.60/3.78  tot:  5         38      (88.4% true)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  Model 13 [ 5 1 4801 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 3.60/3.78  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 3.60/3.78  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 3.60/3.78  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  
% 3.60/3.78  The job finished Mon Jun 20 10:04:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------