TSTP Solution File: SEU375+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU375+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:36:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU375+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:52:18 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.48  SPASS derived 140 clauses, backtracked 24 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 159 clauses.
% 0.21/0.48  SPASS allocated 97859 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.48  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.48  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  
% 0.21/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 59 :
% 0.21/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.48  1[0:Inp] ||  -> one_sorted_str(skc17)*.
% 0.21/0.48  29[0:Inp] || empty_carrier(skc19)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  31[0:Inp] ||  -> net_str(skc18,skc17)*.
% 0.21/0.48  32[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(skc22,skc20)**.
% 0.21/0.48  35[0:Inp] ||  -> element(skc22,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  36[0:Inp] ||  -> element(skc21,the_carrier(skc18))*.
% 0.21/0.48  37[0:Inp] ||  -> element(skc20,the_carrier(skc18))*.
% 0.21/0.48  38[0:Inp] ||  -> full_subnetstr(skc19,skc17,skc18)*.
% 0.21/0.48  39[0:Inp] ||  -> subnetstr(skc19,skc17,skc18)*.
% 0.21/0.48  40[0:Inp] ||  -> related(skc18,skc20,skc21)*.
% 0.21/0.48  41[0:Inp] ||  -> element(skc21,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  43[0:Inp] || related(skc19,skc22,skc21)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  46[0:Inp] rel_str(u) ||  -> one_sorted_str(u)*.
% 0.21/0.48  50[0:Inp] || in(u,v) -> element(u,v)*.
% 0.21/0.48  55[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u)* -> rel_str(v).
% 0.21/0.48  57[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || empty(the_carrier(u))* -> empty_carrier(u).
% 0.21/0.48  58[0:Inp] || element(u,v)* -> empty(v) in(u,v).
% 0.21/0.48  62[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u) subnetstr(w,u,v)* -> net_str(w,u).
% 0.21/0.48  63[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u) subnetstr(w,u,v) full_subnetstr(w,u,v)* -> subrelstr(w,v).
% 0.21/0.48  64[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u) subnetstr(w,u,v) full_subnetstr(w,u,v)* -> full_subrelstr(w,v).
% 0.21/0.48  66[0:Inp] rel_str(u) || full_subrelstr(v,u) subrelstr(v,u)* element(w,the_carrier(u)) element(x,the_carrier(u)) element(y,the_carrier(v)) equal(y,w)* in(y,the_carrier(v)) in(x,the_carrier(v)) related(u,w,x)* element(x,the_carrier(v)) -> related(v,y,x)*.
% 0.21/0.48  67[0:Rew:32.0,35.0] ||  -> element(skc20,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  68[0:Rew:32.0,43.0] || related(skc19,skc20,skc21)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  70[0:MRR:66.5,66.10,50.1,50.1] rel_str(u) || equal(v,w)* subrelstr(x,u)* full_subrelstr(x,u) in(y,the_carrier(x)) in(v,the_carrier(x)) element(y,the_carrier(u)) element(w,the_carrier(u)) related(u,w,y)* -> related(x,v,y)*.
% 0.21/0.48  76[0:Res:1.0,55.0] || net_str(u,skc17)* -> rel_str(u).
% 0.21/0.48  82[0:Res:31.0,55.1] one_sorted_str(skc17) ||  -> rel_str(skc18)*.
% 0.21/0.48  88[0:Res:57.2,29.0] one_sorted_str(skc19) || empty(the_carrier(skc19))* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  91[0:Res:41.0,58.0] ||  -> empty(the_carrier(skc19)) in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  94[0:Res:39.0,64.3] one_sorted_str(skc17) || full_subnetstr(skc19,skc17,skc18)* net_str(skc18,skc17) -> full_subrelstr(skc19,skc18).
% 0.21/0.48  95[0:Res:39.0,63.3] one_sorted_str(skc17) || full_subnetstr(skc19,skc17,skc18)* net_str(skc18,skc17) -> subrelstr(skc19,skc18).
% 0.21/0.48  96[0:Res:39.0,62.1] one_sorted_str(skc17) || net_str(skc18,skc17) -> net_str(skc19,skc17)*.
% 0.21/0.48  107[0:Res:67.0,58.0] ||  -> empty(the_carrier(skc19)) in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  108[0:Res:70.9,68.0] rel_str(u) || element(v,the_carrier(u)) equal(skc20,v) subrelstr(skc19,u) full_subrelstr(skc19,u) element(skc21,the_carrier(u)) in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19)) in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19)) related(u,v,skc21)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  109[0:MRR:82.0,1.0] ||  -> rel_str(skc18)*.
% 0.21/0.48  111[0:MRR:96.0,96.1,1.0,31.0] ||  -> net_str(skc19,skc17)*.
% 0.21/0.48  113[0:MRR:94.0,94.1,94.2,1.0,38.0,31.0] ||  -> full_subrelstr(skc19,skc18)*.
% 0.21/0.48  114[0:MRR:95.0,95.1,95.2,1.0,38.0,31.0] ||  -> subrelstr(skc19,skc18)*.
% 0.21/0.48  149[0:Res:36.0,108.4] rel_str(skc18) || full_subrelstr(skc19,skc18) subrelstr(skc19,skc18) element(u,the_carrier(skc18)) equal(skc20,u) in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19)) in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19)) related(skc18,u,skc21)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  158[0:MRR:149.0,149.1,149.2,109.0,113.0,114.0] || element(u,the_carrier(skc18)) equal(skc20,u) in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19)) in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19)) related(skc18,u,skc21)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  167[1:Spt:107.1] ||  -> in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  168[1:MRR:158.3,167.0] || element(u,the_carrier(skc18)) equal(skc20,u) in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19)) related(skc18,u,skc21)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  171[2:Spt:91.1] ||  -> in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  172[2:MRR:168.2,171.0] || element(u,the_carrier(skc18)) equal(skc20,u) related(skc18,u,skc21)* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  187[0:Res:111.0,76.0] ||  -> rel_str(skc19)*.
% 0.21/0.48  206[0:SoR:88.0,46.1] rel_str(skc19) || empty(the_carrier(skc19))* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  207[0:SSi:206.0,187.0] || empty(the_carrier(skc19))* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  225[0:Res:41.0,58.0] ||  -> empty(the_carrier(skc19)) in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  226[0:Res:67.0,58.0] ||  -> empty(the_carrier(skc19)) in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  254[2:Res:40.0,172.2] || element(skc20,the_carrier(skc18))* equal(skc20,skc20) -> .
% 0.21/0.48  255[2:Obv:254.1] || element(skc20,the_carrier(skc18))* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  256[2:MRR:255.0,37.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.48  257[2:Spt:256.0,91.1,171.0] || in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19))* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  258[2:Spt:256.0,91.0] ||  -> empty(the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  263[0:MRR:225.0,207.0] ||  -> in(skc21,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  264[2:MRR:263.0,257.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.48  265[1:Spt:264.0,107.1,167.0] || in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19))* -> .
% 0.21/0.48  266[1:Spt:264.0,107.0] ||  -> empty(the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  268[0:MRR:226.0,207.0] ||  -> in(skc20,the_carrier(skc19))*.
% 0.21/0.48  269[1:MRR:268.0,265.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : t21_yellow_6 dt_l1_orders_2 t1_subset dt_l1_waybel_0 fc1_struct_0 t2_subset dt_m1_yellow_6 d9_yellow_6 t61_yellow_0
% 0.21/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------