TSTP Solution File: SEU374+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU374+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:19:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.50s 26.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  146 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  173 (  63   ~;  59   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  30  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   0 sgn  42   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t20_yellow_6,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( one_sorted_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( net_str(X2,X1)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( element(X4,the_carrier(X2))
                 => ! [X5] :
                      ( element(X5,the_carrier(X2))
                     => ! [X6] :
                          ( element(X6,the_carrier(X3))
                         => ! [X7] :
                              ( element(X7,the_carrier(X3))
                             => ( ( X4 = X6
                                  & X5 = X7
                                  & related(X3,X6,X7) )
                               => related(X2,X4,X5) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t20_yellow_6) ).

fof(t60_yellow_0,lemma,
    ! [X1] :
      ( rel_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( subrelstr(X2,X1)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( element(X4,the_carrier(X1))
                 => ! [X5] :
                      ( element(X5,the_carrier(X2))
                     => ! [X6] :
                          ( element(X6,the_carrier(X2))
                         => ( ( X5 = X3
                              & X6 = X4
                              & related(X2,X5,X6) )
                           => related(X1,X3,X4) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t60_yellow_0) ).

fof(d8_yellow_6,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( one_sorted_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( net_str(X2,X1)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( net_str(X3,X1)
             => ( subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)
              <=> ( subrelstr(X3,X2)
                  & the_mapping(X1,X3) = relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1),the_mapping(X1,X2),the_carrier(X3)) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d8_yellow_6) ).

fof(dt_m1_yellow_6,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( one_sorted_str(X1)
        & net_str(X2,X1) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)
         => net_str(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_m1_yellow_6) ).

fof(dt_l1_waybel_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( one_sorted_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( net_str(X2,X1)
         => rel_str(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_l1_waybel_0) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( one_sorted_str(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( net_str(X2,X1)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( element(X4,the_carrier(X2))
                   => ! [X5] :
                        ( element(X5,the_carrier(X2))
                       => ! [X6] :
                            ( element(X6,the_carrier(X3))
                           => ! [X7] :
                                ( element(X7,the_carrier(X3))
                               => ( ( X4 = X6
                                    & X5 = X7
                                    & related(X3,X6,X7) )
                                 => related(X2,X4,X5) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t20_yellow_6]) ).

fof(c_0_6,lemma,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ~ rel_str(X7)
      | ~ subrelstr(X8,X7)
      | ~ element(X9,the_carrier(X7))
      | ~ element(X10,the_carrier(X7))
      | ~ element(X11,the_carrier(X8))
      | ~ element(X12,the_carrier(X8))
      | X11 != X9
      | X12 != X10
      | ~ related(X8,X11,X12)
      | related(X7,X9,X10) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t60_yellow_0])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( one_sorted_str(esk468_0)
    & net_str(esk469_0,esk468_0)
    & subnetstr(esk470_0,esk468_0,esk469_0)
    & element(esk471_0,the_carrier(esk469_0))
    & element(esk472_0,the_carrier(esk469_0))
    & element(esk473_0,the_carrier(esk470_0))
    & element(esk474_0,the_carrier(esk470_0))
    & esk471_0 = esk473_0
    & esk472_0 = esk474_0
    & related(esk470_0,esk473_0,esk474_0)
    & ~ related(esk469_0,esk471_0,esk472_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( subrelstr(X6,X5)
        | ~ subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)
        | ~ net_str(X6,X4)
        | ~ net_str(X5,X4)
        | ~ one_sorted_str(X4) )
      & ( the_mapping(X4,X6) = relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))
        | ~ subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)
        | ~ net_str(X6,X4)
        | ~ net_str(X5,X4)
        | ~ one_sorted_str(X4) )
      & ( ~ subrelstr(X6,X5)
        | the_mapping(X4,X6) != relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))
        | subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)
        | ~ net_str(X6,X4)
        | ~ net_str(X5,X4)
        | ~ one_sorted_str(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_yellow_6])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ one_sorted_str(X4)
      | ~ net_str(X5,X4)
      | ~ subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)
      | net_str(X6,X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_m1_yellow_6])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,lemma,
    ( related(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ related(X4,X5,X6)
    | X6 != X3
    | X5 != X2
    | ~ element(X6,the_carrier(X4))
    | ~ element(X5,the_carrier(X4))
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ subrelstr(X4,X1)
    | ~ rel_str(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    related(esk470_0,esk473_0,esk474_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    esk471_0 = esk473_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk473_0,the_carrier(esk470_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subrelstr(X3,X2)
    | ~ one_sorted_str(X1)
    | ~ net_str(X2,X1)
    | ~ net_str(X3,X1)
    | ~ subnetstr(X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( net_str(X1,X2)
    | ~ subnetstr(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ net_str(X3,X2)
    | ~ one_sorted_str(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ one_sorted_str(X3)
      | ~ net_str(X4,X3)
      | rel_str(X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_l1_waybel_0])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
    ( related(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ subrelstr(X4,X1)
    | ~ related(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X4))
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X4))
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ rel_str(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    related(esk470_0,esk471_0,esk474_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk474_0,the_carrier(esk470_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk471_0,the_carrier(esk470_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subrelstr(X1,X2)
    | ~ subnetstr(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ net_str(X2,X3)
    | ~ one_sorted_str(X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    subnetstr(esk470_0,esk468_0,esk469_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    net_str(esk469_0,esk468_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    one_sorted_str(esk468_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk472_0,the_carrier(esk469_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    esk472_0 = esk474_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( rel_str(X1)
    | ~ net_str(X1,X2)
    | ~ one_sorted_str(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ related(esk469_0,esk471_0,esk472_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( related(X1,esk471_0,esk474_0)
    | ~ subrelstr(esk470_0,X1)
    | ~ element(esk474_0,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(esk471_0,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ rel_str(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    subrelstr(esk470_0,esk469_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk474_0,the_carrier(esk469_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk471_0,the_carrier(esk469_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    rel_str(esk469_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ related(esk469_0,esk471_0,esk474_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),c_0_34]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem  : SEU374+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 10:42:08 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/23.50  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.48/23.50  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.48/23.51  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.48/23.51  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/26.69  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.50/26.69  
% 0.50/26.69  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.50/26.69  # OLD status Res
% 0.50/26.69  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.50/26.69  # Preprocessing time       : 0.056 s
% 0.50/26.69  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.50/26.69  # Preprocessing time       : 0.201 s
% 0.50/26.69  
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof found!
% 0.50/26.69  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.50/26.69  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object total steps             : 36
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object clause steps            : 25
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object conjectures             : 22
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 19
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 15
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.50/26.69  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 20
% 0.50/26.69  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.50/26.69  # Parsed axioms                        : 765
% 0.50/26.69  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.50/26.69  # Initial clauses                      : 3342
% 0.50/26.69  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 74
% 0.50/26.69  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3268
% 0.50/26.69  # Processed clauses                    : 3665
% 0.50/26.69  # ...of these trivial                  : 81
% 0.50/26.69  # ...subsumed                          : 273
% 0.50/26.69  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3311
% 0.50/26.69  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 618
% 0.50/26.69  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.50/26.69  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.50/26.69  # Backward-rewritten                   : 41
% 0.50/26.69  # Generated clauses                    : 119199
% 0.50/26.69  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 117828
% 0.50/26.69  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 376
% 0.50/26.69  # Paramodulations                      : 118415
% 0.50/26.69  # Factorizations                       : 14
% 0.50/26.69  # Equation resolutions                 : 841
% 0.50/26.69  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3003
% 0.50/26.69  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 342
% 0.50/26.69  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.50/26.69  #    Negative unit clauses             : 38
% 0.50/26.69  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2620
% 0.50/26.69  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 116144
% 0.50/26.69  # ...number of literals in the above   : 856253
% 0.50/26.69  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.50/26.69  # Current number of archived clauses   : 51
% 0.50/26.69  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3515198
% 0.50/26.69  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 242815
% 0.50/26.69  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 584
% 0.50/26.69  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69977
% 0.50/26.69  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.50/26.69  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 89
% 0.50/26.69  # BW rewrite match successes           : 76
% 0.50/26.69  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.50/26.69  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.50/26.69  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3410658
% 0.50/26.69  
% 0.50/26.69  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/26.69  # User time                : 3.044 s
% 0.50/26.69  # System time              : 0.084 s
% 0.50/26.69  # Total time               : 3.128 s
% 0.50/26.69  # Maximum resident set size: 134332 pages
% 0.50/46.52  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.54  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.55  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.50/46.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.50/46.61  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/46.61  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------