TSTP Solution File: SEU373+2 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SEU373+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 04:15:44 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 61.64s
% Output   : Solution 61.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5916/SEU373+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5916/SEU373+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5916/SEU373+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 6165
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% PrfWatch: 1.92 CPU 2.01 WC
% PrfWatch: 3.91 CPU 4.01 WC
% PrfWatch: 5.90 CPU 6.02 WC
% PrfWatch: 7.89 CPU 8.02 WC
% PrfWatch: 9.88 CPU 10.03 WC
% PrfWatch: 11.87 CPU 12.03 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.447 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% PrfWatch: 13.87 CPU 14.04 WC
% PrfWatch: 15.86 CPU 16.04 WC
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:((one_sorted_str(X1)&net_str(X2,X1))=>![X3]:(subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)=>net_str(X3,X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', dt_m1_yellow_6)).
% fof(7, axiom,![X1]:(one_sorted_str(X1)=>![X2]:(net_str(X2,X1)=>rel_str(X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', dt_l1_waybel_0)).
% fof(17, axiom,![X1]:(one_sorted_str(X1)=>![X2]:(net_str(X2,X1)=>![X3]:(net_str(X3,X1)=>(subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)<=>(subrelstr(X3,X2)&the_mapping(X1,X3)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1),the_mapping(X1,X2),the_carrier(X3))))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d8_yellow_6)).
% fof(57, axiom,![X1]:(rel_str(X1)=>![X2]:(rel_str(X2)=>(subrelstr(X2,X1)<=>(subset(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1))&subset(the_InternalRel(X2),the_InternalRel(X1)))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d13_yellow_0)).
% fof(152, axiom,![X1]:(rel_str(X1)=>![X2]:(subrelstr(X2,X1)=>rel_str(X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', dt_m1_yellow_0)).
% fof(764, conjecture,![X1]:(one_sorted_str(X1)=>![X2]:(net_str(X2,X1)=>![X3]:(subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)=>subset(the_carrier(X3),the_carrier(X2))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t19_yellow_6)).
% fof(765, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(one_sorted_str(X1)=>![X2]:(net_str(X2,X1)=>![X3]:(subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)=>subset(the_carrier(X3),the_carrier(X2)))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[764])).
% fof(966, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(one_sorted_str(X1))|~(net_str(X2,X1)))|![X3]:(~(subnetstr(X3,X1,X2))|net_str(X3,X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(967, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(one_sorted_str(X4))|~(net_str(X5,X4)))|![X6]:(~(subnetstr(X6,X4,X5))|net_str(X6,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[966])).
% fof(968, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(subnetstr(X6,X4,X5))|net_str(X6,X4))|(~(one_sorted_str(X4))|~(net_str(X5,X4)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[967])).
% cnf(969,plain,(net_str(X3,X2)|~net_str(X1,X2)|~one_sorted_str(X2)|~subnetstr(X3,X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[968])).
% fof(986, plain,![X1]:(~(one_sorted_str(X1))|![X2]:(~(net_str(X2,X1))|rel_str(X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(987, plain,![X3]:(~(one_sorted_str(X3))|![X4]:(~(net_str(X4,X3))|rel_str(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[986])).
% fof(988, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(net_str(X4,X3))|rel_str(X4))|~(one_sorted_str(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[987])).
% cnf(989,plain,(rel_str(X2)|~one_sorted_str(X1)|~net_str(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[988])).
% fof(1028, plain,![X1]:(~(one_sorted_str(X1))|![X2]:(~(net_str(X2,X1))|![X3]:(~(net_str(X3,X1))|((~(subnetstr(X3,X1,X2))|(subrelstr(X3,X2)&the_mapping(X1,X3)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1),the_mapping(X1,X2),the_carrier(X3))))&((~(subrelstr(X3,X2))|~(the_mapping(X1,X3)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1),the_mapping(X1,X2),the_carrier(X3))))|subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[17])).
% fof(1029, plain,![X4]:(~(one_sorted_str(X4))|![X5]:(~(net_str(X5,X4))|![X6]:(~(net_str(X6,X4))|((~(subnetstr(X6,X4,X5))|(subrelstr(X6,X5)&the_mapping(X4,X6)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))))&((~(subrelstr(X6,X5))|~(the_mapping(X4,X6)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))))|subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1028])).
% fof(1030, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(net_str(X6,X4))|((~(subnetstr(X6,X4,X5))|(subrelstr(X6,X5)&the_mapping(X4,X6)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))))&((~(subrelstr(X6,X5))|~(the_mapping(X4,X6)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))))|subnetstr(X6,X4,X5))))|~(net_str(X5,X4)))|~(one_sorted_str(X4))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[1029])).
% fof(1031, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((((((subrelstr(X6,X5)|~(subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)))|~(net_str(X6,X4)))|~(net_str(X5,X4)))|~(one_sorted_str(X4)))&((((the_mapping(X4,X6)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))|~(subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)))|~(net_str(X6,X4)))|~(net_str(X5,X4)))|~(one_sorted_str(X4))))&(((((~(subrelstr(X6,X5))|~(the_mapping(X4,X6)=relation_dom_restr_as_relation_of(the_carrier(X5),the_carrier(X4),the_mapping(X4,X5),the_carrier(X6))))|subnetstr(X6,X4,X5))|~(net_str(X6,X4)))|~(net_str(X5,X4)))|~(one_sorted_str(X4)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[1030])).
% cnf(1034,plain,(subrelstr(X3,X2)|~one_sorted_str(X1)|~net_str(X2,X1)|~net_str(X3,X1)|~subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1031])).
% fof(1166, plain,![X1]:(~(rel_str(X1))|![X2]:(~(rel_str(X2))|((~(subrelstr(X2,X1))|(subset(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1))&subset(the_InternalRel(X2),the_InternalRel(X1))))&((~(subset(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1)))|~(subset(the_InternalRel(X2),the_InternalRel(X1))))|subrelstr(X2,X1))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[57])).
% fof(1167, plain,![X3]:(~(rel_str(X3))|![X4]:(~(rel_str(X4))|((~(subrelstr(X4,X3))|(subset(the_carrier(X4),the_carrier(X3))&subset(the_InternalRel(X4),the_InternalRel(X3))))&((~(subset(the_carrier(X4),the_carrier(X3)))|~(subset(the_InternalRel(X4),the_InternalRel(X3))))|subrelstr(X4,X3))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1166])).
% fof(1168, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(rel_str(X4))|((~(subrelstr(X4,X3))|(subset(the_carrier(X4),the_carrier(X3))&subset(the_InternalRel(X4),the_InternalRel(X3))))&((~(subset(the_carrier(X4),the_carrier(X3)))|~(subset(the_InternalRel(X4),the_InternalRel(X3))))|subrelstr(X4,X3))))|~(rel_str(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[1167])).
% fof(1169, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(((((subset(the_carrier(X4),the_carrier(X3))|~(subrelstr(X4,X3)))|~(rel_str(X4)))|~(rel_str(X3)))&(((subset(the_InternalRel(X4),the_InternalRel(X3))|~(subrelstr(X4,X3)))|~(rel_str(X4)))|~(rel_str(X3))))&((((~(subset(the_carrier(X4),the_carrier(X3)))|~(subset(the_InternalRel(X4),the_InternalRel(X3))))|subrelstr(X4,X3))|~(rel_str(X4)))|~(rel_str(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[1168])).
% cnf(1172,plain,(subset(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1))|~rel_str(X1)|~rel_str(X2)|~subrelstr(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1169])).
% fof(1616, plain,![X1]:(~(rel_str(X1))|![X2]:(~(subrelstr(X2,X1))|rel_str(X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[152])).
% fof(1617, plain,![X3]:(~(rel_str(X3))|![X4]:(~(subrelstr(X4,X3))|rel_str(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1616])).
% fof(1618, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(subrelstr(X4,X3))|rel_str(X4))|~(rel_str(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[1617])).
% cnf(1619,plain,(rel_str(X2)|~rel_str(X1)|~subrelstr(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1618])).
% fof(6355, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:(one_sorted_str(X1)&?[X2]:(net_str(X2,X1)&?[X3]:(subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)&~(subset(the_carrier(X3),the_carrier(X2)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[765])).
% fof(6356, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:(one_sorted_str(X4)&?[X5]:(net_str(X5,X4)&?[X6]:(subnetstr(X6,X4,X5)&~(subset(the_carrier(X6),the_carrier(X5)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6355])).
% fof(6357, negated_conjecture,(one_sorted_str(esk497_0)&(net_str(esk498_0,esk497_0)&(subnetstr(esk499_0,esk497_0,esk498_0)&~(subset(the_carrier(esk499_0),the_carrier(esk498_0)))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[6356])).
% cnf(6358,negated_conjecture,(~subset(the_carrier(esk499_0),the_carrier(esk498_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6357])).
% cnf(6359,negated_conjecture,(subnetstr(esk499_0,esk497_0,esk498_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6357])).
% cnf(6360,negated_conjecture,(net_str(esk498_0,esk497_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6357])).
% cnf(6361,negated_conjecture,(one_sorted_str(esk497_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[6357])).
% cnf(7534,plain,(subrelstr(X3,X2)|~subnetstr(X3,X1,X2)|~net_str(X2,X1)|~one_sorted_str(X1)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[1034,969])).
% cnf(7536,plain,(subset(the_carrier(X2),the_carrier(X1))|~subrelstr(X2,X1)|~rel_str(X1)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[1172,1619])).
% cnf(8647,negated_conjecture,(rel_str(esk498_0)|~one_sorted_str(esk497_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[989,6360,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(8649,negated_conjecture,(rel_str(esk498_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[8647,6361,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(8650,negated_conjecture,(rel_str(esk498_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[8649,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(9218,negated_conjecture,(~subrelstr(esk499_0,esk498_0)|~rel_str(esk498_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[6358,7536,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(9239,negated_conjecture,(subrelstr(esk499_0,esk498_0)|~net_str(esk498_0,esk497_0)|~one_sorted_str(esk497_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[7534,6359,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(9240,negated_conjecture,(subrelstr(esk499_0,esk498_0)|$false|~one_sorted_str(esk497_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[9239,6360,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(9241,negated_conjecture,(subrelstr(esk499_0,esk498_0)|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[9240,6361,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(9242,negated_conjecture,(subrelstr(esk499_0,esk498_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[9241,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(164192,negated_conjecture,($false|~rel_str(esk498_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[9218,9242,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(164193,negated_conjecture,($false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[164192,8650,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(164194,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[164193,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(164195,negated_conjecture,($false),164194,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 6688
% # ...of these trivial                : 84
% # ...subsumed                        : 226
% # ...remaining for further processing: 6378
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 650
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 1
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 32
% # Generated clauses                  : 148660
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 147027
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 392
% # Paramodulations                    : 147874
% # Factorizations                     : 14
% # Equation resolutions               : 843
% # Current number of processed clauses: 3065
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 315
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 46
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 2701
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 144964
% # ...number of literals in the above : 1098541
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5408014
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 242268
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15766
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 62
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 37
% # Backwards rewriting index:  2353 leaves,   1.67+/-3.228 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:          950 leaves,   1.08+/-1.317 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:         1808 leaves,   1.35+/-2.583 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 12.844 s
% # System time            : 0.299 s
% # Total time             : 13.143 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 17.32 CPU 17.50 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 17.32 CPU 17.50 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5916/SEU373+2.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------