TSTP Solution File: SEU373+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SEU373+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:36:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 224.85s 225.07s
% Output : Refutation 224.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU373+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:25:15 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 224.85/225.07
% 224.85/225.07 SPASS V 3.9
% 224.85/225.07 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 224.85/225.07 % SZS status Theorem
% 224.85/225.07 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 224.85/225.07 SPASS derived 164 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1968 clauses.
% 224.85/225.07 SPASS allocated 195672 KBytes.
% 224.85/225.07 SPASS spent 0:3:44.59 on the problem.
% 224.85/225.07 0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 224.85/225.07 0:3:42.81 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 224.85/225.07 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 224.85/225.07 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 224.85/225.07 0:00:01.08 for the reduction.
% 224.85/225.07
% 224.85/225.07
% 224.85/225.07 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 17 :
% 224.85/225.07 % SZS output start Refutation
% 224.85/225.07 1[0:Inp] || -> one_sorted_str(skc47)*.
% 224.85/225.07 194[0:Inp] || -> net_str(skc48,skc47)*.
% 224.85/225.07 335[0:Inp] || -> subnetstr(skc49,skc47,skc48)*.
% 224.85/225.07 463[0:Inp] || subset(the_carrier(skc49),the_carrier(skc48))*l -> .
% 224.85/225.07 813[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u)* -> rel_str(v).
% 224.85/225.07 814[0:Inp] rel_str(u) || subrelstr(v,u)* -> rel_str(v).
% 224.85/225.07 1345[0:Inp] rel_str(u) rel_str(v) || subrelstr(v,u)* -> subset(the_carrier(v),the_carrier(u)).
% 224.85/225.07 1354[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u) subnetstr(w,u,v)* -> net_str(w,u).
% 224.85/225.07 1566[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || subnetstr(v,u,w)* net_str(w,u) net_str(v,u) -> subrelstr(v,w).
% 224.85/225.07 2366[0:MRR:1566.3,1354.3] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u) subnetstr(w,u,v)* -> subrelstr(w,v).
% 224.85/225.07 2375[0:MRR:1345.1,814.2] rel_str(u) || subrelstr(v,u)* -> subset(the_carrier(v),the_carrier(u)).
% 224.85/225.07 2787[0:Res:194.0,813.1] one_sorted_str(skc47) || -> rel_str(skc48)*.
% 224.85/225.07 2798[0:Res:335.0,2366.1] one_sorted_str(skc47) || net_str(skc48,skc47) -> subrelstr(skc49,skc48)*.
% 224.85/225.07 2818[0:Res:2375.2,463.0] rel_str(skc48) || subrelstr(skc49,skc48)* -> .
% 224.85/225.07 2820[0:MRR:2787.0,1.0] || -> rel_str(skc48)*.
% 224.85/225.07 2822[0:MRR:2818.0,2820.0] || subrelstr(skc49,skc48)* -> .
% 224.85/225.07 2824[0:MRR:2798.0,2798.1,2798.2,1.0,194.0,2822.0] || -> .
% 224.85/225.07 % SZS output end Refutation
% 224.85/225.07 Formulae used in the proof : t19_yellow_6 dt_l1_waybel_0 dt_m1_yellow_0 d13_yellow_0 dt_m1_yellow_6 d8_yellow_6
% 224.85/225.07
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------