TSTP Solution File: SEU361+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU361+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:41:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.82s 3.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 16 unt; 2 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 59 ( 5 equ; 34 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_574,plain,
( related(X1,X2,X3)
| X2 != join_on_relstr(X1,X4)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,X4)
| ~ relstr_set_smaller(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_574) ).
cnf(i_0_590,plain,
( element(join_on_relstr(X1,X2),the_carrier(X1))
| ~ rel_str(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_590) ).
cnf(i_0_2749,lemma,
( relstr_set_smaller(X1,empty_set,X2)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2749) ).
cnf(i_0_2654,negated_conjecture,
element(esk442_0,the_carrier(esk441_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2654) ).
cnf(i_0_2655,negated_conjecture,
rel_str(esk441_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2655) ).
cnf(i_0_133,plain,
( join_on_relstr(X1,empty_set) = bottom_of_relstr(X1)
| ~ rel_str(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_133) ).
cnf(i_0_2645,lemma,
( empty_carrier(X1)
| ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,empty_set)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
| ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2645) ).
cnf(i_0_2657,negated_conjecture,
antisymmetric_relstr(esk441_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2657) ).
cnf(i_0_2656,negated_conjecture,
lower_bounded_relstr(esk441_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2656) ).
cnf(i_0_2658,negated_conjecture,
~ empty_carrier(esk441_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2658) ).
cnf(i_0_2653,negated_conjecture,
~ related(esk441_0,bottom_of_relstr(esk441_0),esk442_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cllcqjx1/lgb.p',i_0_2653) ).
cnf(c_0_2761,plain,
( related(X1,X2,X3)
| X2 != join_on_relstr(X1,X4)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,X4)
| ~ relstr_set_smaller(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1)) ),
i_0_574 ).
cnf(c_0_2762,plain,
( element(join_on_relstr(X1,X2),the_carrier(X1))
| ~ rel_str(X1) ),
i_0_590 ).
cnf(c_0_2763,lemma,
( relstr_set_smaller(X1,empty_set,X2)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1)) ),
i_0_2749 ).
cnf(c_0_2764,negated_conjecture,
element(esk442_0,the_carrier(esk441_0)),
i_0_2654 ).
cnf(c_0_2765,negated_conjecture,
rel_str(esk441_0),
i_0_2655 ).
cnf(c_0_2766,plain,
( join_on_relstr(X1,empty_set) = bottom_of_relstr(X1)
| ~ rel_str(X1) ),
i_0_133 ).
cnf(c_0_2767,lemma,
( empty_carrier(X1)
| ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,empty_set)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
| ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X1) ),
i_0_2645 ).
cnf(c_0_2768,negated_conjecture,
antisymmetric_relstr(esk441_0),
i_0_2657 ).
cnf(c_0_2769,negated_conjecture,
lower_bounded_relstr(esk441_0),
i_0_2656 ).
cnf(c_0_2770,negated_conjecture,
~ empty_carrier(esk441_0),
i_0_2658 ).
cnf(c_0_2771,plain,
( related(X1,join_on_relstr(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ relstr_set_smaller(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,X2)
| ~ rel_str(X1)
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2761]),c_0_2762]) ).
cnf(c_0_2772,negated_conjecture,
relstr_set_smaller(esk441_0,empty_set,esk442_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2763,c_0_2764]),c_0_2765])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2773,negated_conjecture,
join_on_relstr(esk441_0,empty_set) = bottom_of_relstr(esk441_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2766,c_0_2765]) ).
cnf(c_0_2774,negated_conjecture,
ex_sup_of_relstr_set(esk441_0,empty_set),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2767,c_0_2768]),c_0_2769]),c_0_2765])]),c_0_2770]) ).
cnf(c_0_2775,negated_conjecture,
~ related(esk441_0,bottom_of_relstr(esk441_0),esk442_0),
i_0_2653 ).
cnf(c_0_2776,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2771,c_0_2772]),c_0_2773]),c_0_2774]),c_0_2765]),c_0_2764])]),c_0_2775]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SEU361+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:42:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.82/3.19 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.82/3.19 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.82/3.19 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.82/3.19 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S079N
% 8.82/3.19 # and selection function SelectGrCQArEqFirst.
% 8.82/3.19 #
% 8.82/3.19 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 8.82/3.19 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.82/3.19
% 8.82/3.19 # Proof found!
% 8.82/3.19 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.82/3.19 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.82/3.19 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.82/3.19
% 8.82/3.19 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.82/3.19 # User time : 0.063 s
% 8.82/3.19 # System time : 0.007 s
% 8.82/3.19 # Total time : 0.070 s
% 8.82/3.19 # Maximum resident set size: 7192 pages
% 8.82/3.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------