TSTP Solution File: SEU355+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU355+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:58:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.28s 1.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  11 unt;  21 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  29   ~;  22   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   25 (  13   >;  12   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (;  32   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ relstr_set_smaller > relstr_element_smaller > related > in > element > rel_str > one_sorted_str > finite > empty > #nlpp > the_carrier > empty_set > #skF_5 > #skF_1 > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_6 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(related,type,
    related: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(the_carrier,type,
    the_carrier: $i > $i ).

tff(relstr_set_smaller,type,
    relstr_set_smaller: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(finite,type,
    finite: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(one_sorted_str,type,
    one_sorted_str: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(rel_str,type,
    rel_str: $i > $o ).

tff(relstr_element_smaller,type,
    relstr_element_smaller: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_83,axiom,
    ? [A] : empty(A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_110,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( rel_str(A)
       => ! [B] :
            ( element(B,the_carrier(A))
           => ( relstr_set_smaller(A,empty_set,B)
              & relstr_element_smaller(A,empty_set,B) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_yellow_0) ).

tff(f_49,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( rel_str(A)
     => ! [B,C] :
          ( element(C,the_carrier(A))
         => ( relstr_element_smaller(A,B,C)
          <=> ! [D] :
                ( element(D,the_carrier(A))
               => ( in(D,B)
                 => related(A,C,D) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_lattice3) ).

tff(f_115,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ~ ( in(A,B)
        & empty(B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( rel_str(A)
     => ! [B,C] :
          ( element(C,the_carrier(A))
         => ( relstr_set_smaller(A,B,C)
          <=> ! [D] :
                ( element(D,the_carrier(A))
               => ( in(D,B)
                 => related(A,D,C) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_lattice3) ).

tff(f_100,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( empty(A)
     => ( A = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    empty('#skF_7'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_83]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    rel_str('#skF_9'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_110]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    element('#skF_10',the_carrier('#skF_9')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_110]) ).

tff(c_233,plain,
    ! [A_91,B_92,C_93] :
      ( in('#skF_1'(A_91,B_92,C_93),B_92)
      | relstr_element_smaller(A_91,B_92,C_93)
      | ~ element(C_93,the_carrier(A_91))
      | ~ rel_str(A_91) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ! [B_38,A_37] :
      ( ~ empty(B_38)
      | ~ in(A_37,B_38) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_115]) ).

tff(c_250,plain,
    ! [B_94,A_95,C_96] :
      ( ~ empty(B_94)
      | relstr_element_smaller(A_95,B_94,C_96)
      | ~ element(C_96,the_carrier(A_95))
      | ~ rel_str(A_95) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_233,c_60]) ).

tff(c_255,plain,
    ! [B_94] :
      ( ~ empty(B_94)
      | relstr_element_smaller('#skF_9',B_94,'#skF_10')
      | ~ rel_str('#skF_9') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_250]) ).

tff(c_260,plain,
    ! [B_97] :
      ( ~ empty(B_97)
      | relstr_element_smaller('#skF_9',B_97,'#skF_10') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_58,c_255]) ).

tff(c_160,plain,
    ! [A_70,B_71,C_72] :
      ( in('#skF_2'(A_70,B_71,C_72),B_71)
      | relstr_set_smaller(A_70,B_71,C_72)
      | ~ element(C_72,the_carrier(A_70))
      | ~ rel_str(A_70) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_176,plain,
    ! [B_73,A_74,C_75] :
      ( ~ empty(B_73)
      | relstr_set_smaller(A_74,B_73,C_75)
      | ~ element(C_75,the_carrier(A_74))
      | ~ rel_str(A_74) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_60]) ).

tff(c_181,plain,
    ! [B_73] :
      ( ~ empty(B_73)
      | relstr_set_smaller('#skF_9',B_73,'#skF_10')
      | ~ rel_str('#skF_9') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_176]) ).

tff(c_196,plain,
    ! [B_79] :
      ( ~ empty(B_79)
      | relstr_set_smaller('#skF_9',B_79,'#skF_10') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_58,c_181]) ).

tff(c_63,plain,
    ! [A_41] :
      ( ( empty_set = A_41 )
      | ~ empty(A_41) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_100]) ).

tff(c_72,plain,
    empty_set = '#skF_7',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_63]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    ( ~ relstr_element_smaller('#skF_9',empty_set,'#skF_10')
    | ~ relstr_set_smaller('#skF_9',empty_set,'#skF_10') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_110]) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    ( ~ relstr_element_smaller('#skF_9','#skF_7','#skF_10')
    | ~ relstr_set_smaller('#skF_9','#skF_7','#skF_10') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_72,c_72,c_54]) ).

tff(c_103,plain,
    ~ relstr_set_smaller('#skF_9','#skF_7','#skF_10'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_102]) ).

tff(c_199,plain,
    ~ empty('#skF_7'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_103]) ).

tff(c_203,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_44,c_199]) ).

tff(c_204,plain,
    ~ relstr_element_smaller('#skF_9','#skF_7','#skF_10'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_102]) ).

tff(c_263,plain,
    ~ empty('#skF_7'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_260,c_204]) ).

tff(c_267,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_44,c_263]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SEU355+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:13:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.28/1.88  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.28/1.89  
% 3.28/1.89  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Inference rules
% 3.56/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.91  #Ref     : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Sup     : 43
% 3.56/1.91  #Fact    : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Define  : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Split   : 3
% 3.56/1.91  #Chain   : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Close   : 0
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Ordering : KBO
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Simplification rules
% 3.56/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.91  #Subsume      : 1
% 3.56/1.91  #Demod        : 10
% 3.56/1.91  #Tautology    : 13
% 3.56/1.91  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.56/1.91  #BackRed      : 2
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.56/1.91  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.56/1.91  
% 3.56/1.91  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.56/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.92  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 3.56/1.92  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.56/1.92  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.56/1.92  Main loop            : 0.34
% 3.56/1.92  Inferencing          : 0.14
% 3.56/1.92  Reduction            : 0.08
% 3.56/1.92  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.56/1.92  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.56/1.92  Subsumption          : 0.07
% 3.56/1.92  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.56/1.92  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.56/1.92  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.56/1.92  Total                : 0.88
% 3.56/1.92  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.56/1.92  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.92  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.92  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------