TSTP Solution File: SEU349+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SEU349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.08s 300.23s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 08:16:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Mon Jun 20 08:16:29 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 6277.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(A)| -relation_of2(B,A,A)|strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(A,B)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -reflexive(A)| -antisymmetric(A)| -transitive(A)| -v1_partfun1(A,B,B)| -relation_of2(A,B,B)|strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(B,A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -lattice(A)| -latt_str(A)|strict_rel_str(poset_of_lattice(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -lattice(A)| -latt_str(A)|reflexive_relstr(poset_of_lattice(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -lattice(A)| -latt_str(A)|transitive_relstr(poset_of_lattice(A)).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty_carrier(A)| -lattice(A)| -latt_str(A)|antisymmetric_relstr(poset_of_lattice(A)).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 127 during input processing: 0 [copy,127,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  127 back subsumes 100.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.47  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.47  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.47  number of clauses in intial UL: 94
% 0.20/0.47  number of clauses initially in problem: 121
% 0.20/0.47  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 77
% 0.20/0.47  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.20/0.47  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.20/0.47  absolute distinct symbol count: 67
% 0.20/0.47     distinct predicate count: 35
% 0.20/0.47     distinct function count: 18
% 0.20/0.47     distinct constant count: 14
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.08/300.23  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------