TSTP Solution File: SEU344+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU344+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:36:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 185.20s 185.41s
% Output   : Refutation 185.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SEU344+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 03:41:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 185.20/185.41  
% 185.20/185.41  SPASS V 3.9 
% 185.20/185.41  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 185.20/185.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 185.20/185.41  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 185.20/185.41  SPASS derived 13499 clauses, backtracked 726 clauses, performed 46 splits and kept 9451 clauses.
% 185.20/185.41  SPASS allocated 184793 KBytes.
% 185.20/185.41  SPASS spent	0:03:04.68 on the problem.
% 185.20/185.41  		0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 185.20/185.41  		0:2:53.89 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 185.20/185.41  		0:00:00.24 for inferences.
% 185.20/185.41  		0:00:00.06 for the backtracking.
% 185.20/185.41  		0:00:09.43 for the reduction.
% 185.20/185.41  
% 185.20/185.41  
% 185.20/185.41  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 35 :
% 185.20/185.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% 185.20/185.41  91[0:Inp] ||  -> latt_str(boole_lattice(u))*.
% 185.20/185.41  98[0:Inp] ||  -> strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(u))*.
% 185.20/185.41  144[0:Inp] || empty_carrier(boole_lattice(u))* -> .
% 185.20/185.41  167[0:Inp] ||  -> element(skc37,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35)))*.
% 185.20/185.41  168[0:Inp] ||  -> element(skc36,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35)))*.
% 185.20/185.41  202[0:Inp] latt_str(u) ||  -> join_semilatt_str(u)*.
% 185.20/185.41  235[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(u,set_union2(u,v))*r.
% 185.20/185.41  407[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc36,skc37) below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,skc37)*.
% 185.20/185.41  550[0:Inp] || subset(u,v) -> equal(set_union2(u,v),v)**.
% 185.20/185.41  577[0:Inp] || subset(skc36,skc37) below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,skc37)* -> .
% 185.20/185.41  1153[0:Inp] || element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(v))) element(w,the_carrier(boole_lattice(v))) -> equal(join(boole_lattice(v),w,u),set_union2(w,u))**.
% 185.20/185.41  1335[0:Inp] join_semilatt_str(u) || element(v,the_carrier(u)) element(w,the_carrier(u)) equal(join(u,w,v),v)** -> empty_carrier(u) below(u,w,v).
% 185.20/185.41  1336[0:Inp] join_semilatt_str(u) || element(v,the_carrier(u)) element(w,the_carrier(u)) below(u,w,v) -> empty_carrier(u) equal(join(u,w,v),v)**.
% 185.20/185.41  1783[0:Res:168.0,1336.2] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u) element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35))) -> equal(join(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u),u)** empty_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35)).
% 185.20/185.41  1784[0:Res:168.0,1335.2] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || equal(join(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u),u)** element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35))) -> below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u) empty_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35)).
% 185.20/185.41  1800[0:Res:168.0,1153.0] || element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35))) -> equal(join(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u),set_union2(skc36,u))**.
% 185.20/185.41  1965[0:Rew:1800.1,1784.1] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || equal(set_union2(skc36,u),u) element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35))) -> below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u)* empty_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35)).
% 185.20/185.41  1966[0:MRR:1965.4,144.0] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35))) equal(set_union2(skc36,u),u) -> below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u)*.
% 185.20/185.41  1967[0:Rew:1800.1,1783.3] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u)* element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35))) -> equal(set_union2(skc36,u),u) empty_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35)).
% 185.20/185.41  1968[0:MRR:1967.4,144.0] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || element(u,the_carrier(boole_lattice(skc35))) below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,u)* -> equal(set_union2(skc36,u),u).
% 185.20/185.41  2051[0:Res:167.0,1968.2] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,skc37)* -> equal(set_union2(skc36,skc37),skc37).
% 185.20/185.41  2052[0:Res:167.0,1966.2] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) || equal(set_union2(skc36,skc37),skc37) -> below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,skc37)*.
% 185.20/185.41  2202[1:Spt:407.1] ||  -> below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,skc37)*.
% 185.20/185.41  2203[1:MRR:577.1,2202.0] || subset(skc36,skc37)*r -> .
% 185.20/185.41  2204[1:MRR:2051.1,2202.0] join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(skc35)) ||  -> equal(set_union2(skc36,skc37),skc37)**.
% 185.20/185.41  2719[1:SSi:2204.0,202.0,98.0,91.1] ||  -> equal(set_union2(skc36,skc37),skc37)**.
% 185.20/185.41  7077[1:SpR:2719.0,235.0] ||  -> subset(skc36,skc37)*r.
% 185.20/185.41  7080[1:MRR:7077.0,2203.0] ||  -> .
% 185.20/185.41  7081[1:Spt:7080.0,407.1,2202.0] || below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,skc37)* -> .
% 185.20/185.41  7082[1:Spt:7080.0,407.0] ||  -> subset(skc36,skc37)*r.
% 185.20/185.41  7103[0:SSi:2052.0,202.0,98.0,91.1] || equal(set_union2(skc36,skc37),skc37) -> below(boole_lattice(skc35),skc36,skc37)*.
% 185.20/185.41  7104[1:MRR:7103.1,7081.0] || equal(set_union2(skc36,skc37),skc37)** -> .
% 185.20/185.41  18094[1:SpL:550.1,7104.0] || subset(skc36,skc37)*r equal(skc37,skc37) -> .
% 185.20/185.41  18098[1:Obv:18094.1] || subset(skc36,skc37)*r -> .
% 185.20/185.41  18099[1:MRR:18098.0,7082.0] ||  -> .
% 185.20/185.41  % SZS output end Refutation
% 185.20/185.41  Formulae used in the proof : dt_k1_lattice3 fc1_lattice3 t2_lattice3 dt_l3_lattices t7_xboole_1 t12_xboole_1 t1_lattice3 d3_lattices
% 185.20/185.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------