TSTP Solution File: SEU344+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU344+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:19:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.65s 69.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 108 ( 17 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 118 ( 47 ~; 44 |; 13 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 5 sgn 34 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t1_lattice3,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
=> ! [X3] :
( element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
=> ( join(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3) = set_union2(X2,X3)
& meet(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3) = set_intersection2(X2,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t1_lattice3) ).
fof(d3_lattices,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ empty_carrier(X1)
& join_semilatt_str(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
=> ! [X3] :
( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
=> ( below(X1,X2,X3)
<=> join(X1,X2,X3) = X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_lattices) ).
fof(fc1_lattice3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ~ empty_carrier(boole_lattice(X1))
& strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc1_lattice3) ).
fof(t2_lattice3,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
=> ! [X3] :
( element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
=> ( below(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3)
<=> subset(X2,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t2_lattice3) ).
fof(t12_xboole_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t12_xboole_1) ).
fof(dt_l3_lattices,axiom,
! [X1] :
( latt_str(X1)
=> ( meet_semilatt_str(X1)
& join_semilatt_str(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_l3_lattices) ).
fof(dt_k1_lattice3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X1))
& latt_str(boole_lattice(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k1_lattice3) ).
fof(t7_xboole_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t7_xboole_1) ).
fof(c_0_8,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( join(boole_lattice(X4),X5,X6) = set_union2(X5,X6)
| ~ element(X6,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X4)))
| ~ element(X5,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X4))) )
& ( meet(boole_lattice(X4),X5,X6) = set_intersection2(X5,X6)
| ~ element(X6,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X4)))
| ~ element(X5,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X4))) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_lattice3])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ below(X4,X5,X6)
| join(X4,X5,X6) = X6
| ~ element(X6,the_carrier(X4))
| ~ element(X5,the_carrier(X4))
| empty_carrier(X4)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X4) )
& ( join(X4,X5,X6) != X6
| below(X4,X5,X6)
| ~ element(X6,the_carrier(X4))
| ~ element(X5,the_carrier(X4))
| empty_carrier(X4)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d3_lattices])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( ~ empty_carrier(boole_lattice(X2))
& strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X2)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_lattice3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
=> ! [X3] :
( element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
=> ( below(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3)
<=> subset(X2,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t2_lattice3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
( join(boole_lattice(X2),X1,X3) = set_union2(X1,X3)
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X2)))
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X2))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( empty_carrier(X1)
| join(X1,X2,X3) = X3
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ below(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
~ empty_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( element(esk2_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0)))
& element(esk3_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0)))
& ( ~ below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0)
| ~ subset(esk2_0,esk3_0) )
& ( below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0)
| subset(esk2_0,esk3_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,lemma,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ subset(X3,X4)
| set_union2(X3,X4) = X4 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ below(boole_lattice(X3),X1,X2)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(X3))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X3)))
| ~ element(X1,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X3))) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
element(esk3_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
element(esk2_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,lemma,
( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( meet_semilatt_str(X2)
| ~ latt_str(X2) )
& ( join_semilatt_str(X2)
| ~ latt_str(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_l3_lattices])])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X2))
& latt_str(boole_lattice(X2)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_lattice3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_24,lemma,
! [X3,X4] : subset(X3,set_union2(X3,X4)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( set_union2(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0
| ~ join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(esk1_0)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ latt_str(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
latt_str(boole_lattice(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,lemma,
subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
set_union2(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| ~ below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,lemma,
subset(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( empty_carrier(X1)
| below(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
| join(X1,X2,X3) != X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
( below(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3)
| set_union2(X2,X3) != X3
| ~ join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(X1))
| ~ element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
| ~ element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1))) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_12]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,lemma,
~ join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(esk1_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_29]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,lemma,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU344+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 03:40:02 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.39/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.51/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.51/46.46 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.51/46.46
% 0.51/46.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/69.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/69.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/69.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/69.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/69.83 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.65/69.83
% 0.65/69.83 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.65/69.83 # OLD status Res
% 0.65/69.83 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.65/69.83 # Preprocessing time : 0.062 s
% 0.65/69.83 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.65/69.83
% 0.65/69.83 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.65/69.83 # OLD status Res
% 0.65/69.83 # Preprocessing time : 0.098 s
% 0.65/69.83 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 0.65/69.83
% 0.65/69.83 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.65/69.83 # OLD status Res
% 0.65/69.83 # Preprocessing time : 0.158 s
% 0.65/69.83 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 0.65/69.83 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 0.65/69.83 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 0.65/69.83
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof found!
% 0.65/69.83 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.65/69.83 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object total steps : 37
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object clause steps : 20
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 0.65/69.83 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 16
% 0.65/69.83 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.65/69.83 # Parsed axioms : 599
% 0.65/69.83 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 498
% 0.65/69.83 # Initial clauses : 282
% 0.65/69.83 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.65/69.83 # Initial clauses in saturation : 281
% 0.65/69.83 # Processed clauses : 1673
% 0.65/69.83 # ...of these trivial : 130
% 0.65/69.83 # ...subsumed : 828
% 0.65/69.83 # ...remaining for further processing : 715
% 0.65/69.83 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 198
% 0.65/69.83 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.65/69.83 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.65/69.83 # Backward-rewritten : 74
% 0.65/69.83 # Generated clauses : 14397
% 0.65/69.83 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 11340
% 0.65/69.83 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 145
% 0.65/69.83 # Paramodulations : 14072
% 0.65/69.83 # Factorizations : 14
% 0.65/69.83 # Equation resolutions : 239
% 0.65/69.83 # Current number of processed clauses : 603
% 0.65/69.83 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 110
% 0.65/69.83 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.65/69.83 # Negative unit clauses : 31
% 0.65/69.83 # Non-unit-clauses : 460
% 0.65/69.83 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9314
% 0.65/69.83 # ...number of literals in the above : 42345
% 0.65/69.83 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.65/69.83 # Current number of archived clauses : 75
% 0.65/69.83 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45220
% 0.65/69.83 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16243
% 0.65/69.83 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 895
% 0.65/69.83 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8696
% 0.65/69.83 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.65/69.83 # BW rewrite match attempts : 128
% 0.65/69.83 # BW rewrite match successes : 42
% 0.65/69.83 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.65/69.83 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.65/69.83 # Termbank termtop insertions : 200495
% 0.65/69.83
% 0.65/69.83 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.65/69.83 # User time : 0.153 s
% 0.65/69.83 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.65/69.83 # Total time : 0.161 s
% 0.65/69.83 # Maximum resident set size: 13460 pages
% 0.65/92.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/92.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/92.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.ineprover:
% 0.65/92.56 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.65/92.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.65/92.58 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------