TSTP Solution File: SEU337+2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SEU337+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:26:03 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.15s 1.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  22   ~;  20   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn;  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t17_tops_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( top_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(X1))))
         => ( open_subsets(X2,X1)
          <=> closed_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2zv1y7RdMs/E---3.1_18444.p',t17_tops_2) ).

fof(dt_k7_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => element(complements_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2zv1y7RdMs/E---3.1_18444.p',dt_k7_setfam_1) ).

fof(involutiveness_k7_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => complements_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2zv1y7RdMs/E---3.1_18444.p',involutiveness_k7_setfam_1) ).

fof(t16_tops_2,lemma,
    ! [X1] :
      ( top_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(X1))))
         => ( closed_subsets(X2,X1)
          <=> open_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2zv1y7RdMs/E---3.1_18444.p',t16_tops_2) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( top_str(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(X1))))
           => ( open_subsets(X2,X1)
            <=> closed_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t17_tops_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( ~ element(X35,powerset(powerset(X34)))
      | element(complements_of_subsets(X34,X35),powerset(powerset(X34))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_setfam_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( top_str(esk1_0)
    & element(esk2_0,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(esk1_0))))
    & ( ~ open_subsets(esk2_0,esk1_0)
      | ~ closed_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0) )
    & ( open_subsets(esk2_0,esk1_0)
      | closed_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] :
      ( ~ element(X37,powerset(powerset(X36)))
      | complements_of_subsets(X36,complements_of_subsets(X36,X37)) = X37 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[involutiveness_k7_setfam_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,lemma,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( ( ~ closed_subsets(X28,X27)
        | open_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(X27),X28),X27)
        | ~ element(X28,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(X27))))
        | ~ top_str(X27) )
      & ( ~ open_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(X27),X28),X27)
        | closed_subsets(X28,X27)
        | ~ element(X28,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(X27))))
        | ~ top_str(X27) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t16_tops_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( element(complements_of_subsets(X2,X1),powerset(powerset(X2)))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(esk1_0)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( complements_of_subsets(X2,complements_of_subsets(X2,X1)) = X1
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
    ( closed_subsets(X2,X1)
    | ~ open_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(X1))))
    | ~ top_str(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    element(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),powerset(powerset(the_carrier(esk1_0)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0)) = esk2_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    top_str(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( open_subsets(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | closed_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ open_subsets(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | ~ closed_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    closed_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
    ( open_subsets(complements_of_subsets(the_carrier(X2),X1),X2)
    | ~ closed_subsets(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(the_carrier(X2))))
    | ~ top_str(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ open_subsets(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_13])]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.19  % Problem    : SEU337+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.20  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.19/0.42  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.42  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.42  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.42  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.19/0.42  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.19/0.42  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:10:39 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.42  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.40/0.62  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.40/0.62  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2zv1y7RdMs/E---3.1_18444.p
% 5.15/1.34  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 5.15/1.34  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.15/1.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # new_bool_1 with pid 18524 completed with status 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 5.15/1.34  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.15/1.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.15/1.34  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.15/1.34  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 45s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 18526 completed with status 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 5.15/1.34  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.15/1.34  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.15/1.34  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.15/1.34  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 5.15/1.34  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 45s (1) cores
% 5.15/1.34  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 5.15/1.34  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.15/1.34  
% 5.15/1.34  # Proof found!
% 5.15/1.34  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.15/1.34  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.15/1.34  # Parsed axioms                        : 556
% 5.15/1.34  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 344
% 5.15/1.34  # Initial clauses                      : 1452
% 5.15/1.34  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 5.15/1.34  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1450
% 5.15/1.34  # Processed clauses                    : 2679
% 5.15/1.34  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 5.15/1.34  # ...subsumed                          : 311
% 5.15/1.34  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2363
% 5.15/1.34  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 700
% 5.15/1.34  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Backward-subsumed                    : 20
% 5.15/1.34  # Backward-rewritten                   : 13
% 5.15/1.34  # Generated clauses                    : 2144
% 5.15/1.34  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1863
% 5.15/1.34  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 270
% 5.15/1.34  # Paramodulations                      : 1631
% 5.15/1.34  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # NegExts                              : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Equation resolutions                 : 702
% 5.15/1.34  # Total rewrite steps                  : 394
% 5.15/1.34  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 5.15/1.34  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 5.15/1.34  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 5.15/1.34  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 5.15/1.34  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 5.15/1.34  # Current number of processed clauses  : 471
% 5.15/1.34  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 145
% 5.15/1.34  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 5.15/1.34  #    Negative unit clauses             : 102
% 5.15/1.34  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 221
% 5.15/1.34  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1974
% 5.15/1.34  # ...number of literals in the above   : 7741
% 5.15/1.34  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1384
% 5.15/1.34  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1026791
% 5.15/1.34  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37640
% 5.15/1.34  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 445
% 5.15/1.34  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1329
% 5.15/1.34  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 86
% 5.15/1.34  # BW rewrite match successes           : 51
% 5.15/1.34  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.15/1.34  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 147979
% 5.15/1.34  
% 5.15/1.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.15/1.34  # User time                : 0.585 s
% 5.15/1.34  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 5.15/1.34  # Total time               : 0.600 s
% 5.15/1.34  # Maximum resident set size: 5516 pages
% 5.15/1.34  
% 5.15/1.34  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.15/1.34  # User time                : 1.224 s
% 5.15/1.34  # System time              : 0.022 s
% 5.15/1.34  # Total time               : 1.246 s
% 5.15/1.34  # Maximum resident set size: 2448 pages
% 5.15/1.34  % E---3.1 exiting
% 5.15/1.34  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------