TSTP Solution File: SEU317+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU317+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 280.60s 37.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 280.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 8 unt; 11 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 72 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1815,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_1815) ).
cnf(i_0_1856,negated_conjecture,
element(esk331_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk330_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_1856) ).
cnf(i_0_273,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_273) ).
cnf(i_0_1836,lemma,
( in(X1,topstr_closure(X2,X3))
| subset(X3,esk328_3(X2,X3,X1))
| ~ top_str(X2)
| ~ in(X1,the_carrier(X2))
| ~ element(X3,powerset(the_carrier(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_1836) ).
cnf(i_0_1857,negated_conjecture,
top_str(esk330_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_1857) ).
cnf(i_0_272,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk60_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_272) ).
cnf(i_0_1835,lemma,
( in(X1,topstr_closure(X2,X3))
| ~ top_str(X2)
| ~ in(X1,the_carrier(X2))
| ~ element(X3,powerset(the_carrier(X2)))
| ~ in(X1,esk328_3(X2,X3,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_1835) ).
cnf(i_0_271,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk60_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_271) ).
cnf(i_0_1855,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk331_0,topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k08j1jn8/input.p',i_0_1855) ).
cnf(c_0_1867,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
i_0_1815 ).
cnf(c_0_1868,negated_conjecture,
element(esk331_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk330_0))),
i_0_1856 ).
cnf(c_0_1869,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
i_0_273 ).
cnf(c_0_1870,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk331_0,the_carrier(esk330_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1867,c_0_1868]) ).
cnf(c_0_1871,lemma,
( in(X1,topstr_closure(X2,X3))
| subset(X3,esk328_3(X2,X3,X1))
| ~ top_str(X2)
| ~ in(X1,the_carrier(X2))
| ~ element(X3,powerset(the_carrier(X2))) ),
i_0_1836 ).
cnf(c_0_1872,negated_conjecture,
top_str(esk330_0),
i_0_1857 ).
cnf(c_0_1873,plain,
( in(X1,the_carrier(esk330_0))
| ~ in(X1,esk331_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1869,c_0_1870]) ).
cnf(c_0_1874,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk60_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_272 ).
cnf(c_0_1875,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0))
| subset(esk331_0,esk328_3(esk330_0,esk331_0,X1))
| ~ in(X1,the_carrier(esk330_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1871,c_0_1868]),c_0_1872])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1876,plain,
( in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X1),the_carrier(esk330_0))
| subset(esk331_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1873,c_0_1874]) ).
cnf(c_0_1877,lemma,
( in(X1,topstr_closure(X2,X3))
| ~ top_str(X2)
| ~ in(X1,the_carrier(X2))
| ~ element(X3,powerset(the_carrier(X2)))
| ~ in(X1,esk328_3(X2,X3,X1)) ),
i_0_1835 ).
cnf(c_0_1878,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X1),topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0))
| subset(esk331_0,esk328_3(esk330_0,esk331_0,esk60_2(esk331_0,X1)))
| subset(esk331_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1875,c_0_1876]) ).
cnf(c_0_1879,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0))
| ~ in(X1,esk328_3(esk330_0,esk331_0,X1))
| ~ in(X1,the_carrier(esk330_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1877,c_0_1868]),c_0_1872])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1880,plain,
( in(X1,esk328_3(esk330_0,esk331_0,esk60_2(esk331_0,X2)))
| in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X2),topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0))
| subset(esk331_0,X2)
| ~ in(X1,esk331_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1869,c_0_1878]) ).
cnf(c_0_1881,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X1),topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0))
| subset(esk331_0,X1)
| ~ in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X1),esk328_3(esk330_0,esk331_0,esk60_2(esk331_0,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1879,c_0_1876]) ).
cnf(c_0_1882,plain,
( in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X1),esk328_3(esk330_0,esk331_0,esk60_2(esk331_0,X2)))
| in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X2),topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0))
| subset(esk331_0,X2)
| subset(esk331_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1880,c_0_1874]) ).
cnf(c_0_1883,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk60_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_271 ).
cnf(c_0_1884,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk60_2(esk331_0,X1),topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0))
| subset(esk331_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1881,c_0_1882]) ).
cnf(c_0_1885,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk331_0,topstr_closure(esk330_0,esk331_0)),
i_0_1855 ).
cnf(c_0_1886,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1883,c_0_1884]),c_0_1885]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU317+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 20:42:31 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 280.60/37.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by Enigma+tptp-cade20-model01-h2e15+lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15+coop-eprover66:
% 280.60/37.33 # ENIGMA: LightGBM model '/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/data/Enigma/tptp-cade20-model01-h2e15/lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15/model.lgb' loaded. (hash_base: 32768; conj_feats: 41; version: 991; iters: 150)
% 280.60/37.33 # Preprocessing time : 1.042 s
% 280.60/37.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 280.60/37.33
% 280.60/37.33 # Proof found!
% 280.60/37.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 280.60/37.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 280.60/37.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 280.60/37.33
% 280.60/37.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 280.60/37.33 # User time : 3.004 s
% 280.60/37.33 # System time : 0.089 s
% 280.60/37.33 # Total time : 3.094 s
% 280.60/37.33 # ...preprocessing : 1.042 s
% 280.60/37.33 # ...main loop : 2.051 s
% 280.60/37.33 # Maximum resident set size: 107160 pages
% 280.60/37.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------