TSTP Solution File: SEU308+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU308+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.23s 2.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 10 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1551,negated_conjecture,
subset_difference(the_carrier(esk285_0),cast_as_carrier_subset(esk285_0),esk286_0) != subset_complement(the_carrier(esk285_0),esk286_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jwh94kf7/lgb.p',i_0_1551) ).
cnf(i_0_237,plain,
( cast_as_carrier_subset(X1) = the_carrier(X1)
| ~ one_sorted_str(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jwh94kf7/lgb.p',i_0_237) ).
cnf(i_0_1553,negated_conjecture,
one_sorted_str(esk285_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jwh94kf7/lgb.p',i_0_1553) ).
cnf(i_0_692,plain,
( subset_difference(X1,X2,X3) = set_difference(X2,X3)
| ~ element(X3,powerset(X1))
| ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jwh94kf7/lgb.p',i_0_692) ).
cnf(i_0_1552,negated_conjecture,
element(esk286_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk285_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jwh94kf7/lgb.p',i_0_1552) ).
cnf(i_0_390,plain,
element(X1,powerset(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jwh94kf7/lgb.p',i_0_390) ).
cnf(i_0_315,plain,
( subset_complement(X1,X2) = set_difference(X1,X2)
| ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jwh94kf7/lgb.p',i_0_315) ).
cnf(c_0_1561,negated_conjecture,
subset_difference(the_carrier(esk285_0),cast_as_carrier_subset(esk285_0),esk286_0) != subset_complement(the_carrier(esk285_0),esk286_0),
i_0_1551 ).
cnf(c_0_1562,plain,
( cast_as_carrier_subset(X1) = the_carrier(X1)
| ~ one_sorted_str(X1) ),
i_0_237 ).
cnf(c_0_1563,negated_conjecture,
one_sorted_str(esk285_0),
i_0_1553 ).
cnf(c_0_1564,negated_conjecture,
subset_difference(the_carrier(esk285_0),the_carrier(esk285_0),esk286_0) != subset_complement(the_carrier(esk285_0),esk286_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1561,c_0_1562]),c_0_1563])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1565,plain,
( subset_difference(X1,X2,X3) = set_difference(X2,X3)
| ~ element(X3,powerset(X1))
| ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
i_0_692 ).
cnf(c_0_1566,negated_conjecture,
element(esk286_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk285_0))),
i_0_1552 ).
cnf(c_0_1567,plain,
element(X1,powerset(X1)),
i_0_390 ).
cnf(c_0_1568,plain,
subset_complement(the_carrier(esk285_0),esk286_0) != set_difference(the_carrier(esk285_0),esk286_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1564,c_0_1565]),c_0_1566]),c_0_1567])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1569,plain,
( subset_complement(X1,X2) = set_difference(X1,X2)
| ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
i_0_315 ).
cnf(c_0_1570,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1568,c_0_1569]),c_0_1566])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SEU308+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.31 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.31 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:23:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.16/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.16/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.23/2.84 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.23/2.84 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.23/2.84 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.23/2.84 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.23/2.84 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.23/2.84 #
% 8.23/2.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 8.23/2.84 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.23/2.84
% 8.23/2.84 # Proof found!
% 8.23/2.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.23/2.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.23/2.84 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.23/2.84
% 8.23/2.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.23/2.84 # User time : 0.031 s
% 8.23/2.84 # System time : 0.009 s
% 8.23/2.84 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 8.23/2.84 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.23/2.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------