TSTP Solution File: SEU303+3 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU303+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 03:20:52 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.07s
% Output : Solution 1.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4585/SEU303+3.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4585/SEU303+3.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4585/SEU303+3.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 4681
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(7, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(((relation(X1)&function(X1))&finite(X2))=>finite(relation_image(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', fc13_finset_1)).
% fof(20, axiom,![X1]:(relation(X1)=>relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1))=relation_rng(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t146_relat_1)).
% fof(63, conjecture,![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>(finite(relation_dom(X1))=>finite(relation_rng(X1)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t26_finset_1)).
% fof(64, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>(finite(relation_dom(X1))=>finite(relation_rng(X1))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[63])).
% fof(103, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(((~(relation(X1))|~(function(X1)))|~(finite(X2)))|finite(relation_image(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(104, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(((~(relation(X3))|~(function(X3)))|~(finite(X4)))|finite(relation_image(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[103])).
% cnf(105,plain,(finite(relation_image(X1,X2))|~finite(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[104])).
% fof(155, plain,![X1]:(~(relation(X1))|relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1))=relation_rng(X1)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20])).
% fof(156, plain,![X2]:(~(relation(X2))|relation_image(X2,relation_dom(X2))=relation_rng(X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[155])).
% cnf(157,plain,(relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1))=relation_rng(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[156])).
% fof(355, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))&(finite(relation_dom(X1))&~(finite(relation_rng(X1))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[64])).
% fof(356, negated_conjecture,?[X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))&(finite(relation_dom(X2))&~(finite(relation_rng(X2))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[355])).
% fof(357, negated_conjecture,((relation(esk27_0)&function(esk27_0))&(finite(relation_dom(esk27_0))&~(finite(relation_rng(esk27_0))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[356])).
% cnf(358,negated_conjecture,(~finite(relation_rng(esk27_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[357])).
% cnf(359,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_dom(esk27_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[357])).
% cnf(360,negated_conjecture,(function(esk27_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[357])).
% cnf(361,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk27_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[357])).
% cnf(636,negated_conjecture,(relation_image(esk27_0,relation_dom(esk27_0))=relation_rng(esk27_0)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[157,361,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(707,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk27_0,X1))|~finite(X1)|~relation(esk27_0)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[105,360,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(719,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk27_0,X1))|~finite(X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[707,361,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(720,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk27_0,X1))|~finite(X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[719,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1109,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk27_0,relation_dom(esk27_0)))),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[720,359,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2218,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_rng(esk27_0))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1109,636,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2219,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[2218,358,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2220,negated_conjecture,($false),2219,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 449
% # ...of these trivial : 41
% # ...subsumed : 23
% # ...remaining for further processing: 385
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 52
% # Generated clauses : 1490
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1392
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 1481
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 332
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 233
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 16
% # Non-unit-clauses : 83
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 967
% # ...number of literals in the above : 1100
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 110
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 110
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 101
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 282
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 15
% # Backwards rewriting index: 425 leaves, 1.21+/-1.061 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 172 leaves, 1.40+/-1.520 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 366 leaves, 1.23+/-1.107 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.051 s
% # System time : 0.007 s
% # Total time : 0.058 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.15 CPU 0.24 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.15 CPU 0.24 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4585/SEU303+3.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------