TSTP Solution File: SEU303+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SEU303+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:24:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 1.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 5 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 14 ~; 11 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 6 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
function: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
finite: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
relation_image: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
relation_rng: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
fof(t26_finset_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( finite(relation_dom(X1))
=> finite(relation_rng(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_finset_1) ).
fof(fc13_finset_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1)
& finite(X2) )
=> finite(relation_image(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc13_finset_1) ).
fof(t146_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1)) = relation_rng(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t146_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( finite(relation_dom(X1))
=> finite(relation_rng(X1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_finset_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ finite(X4)
| finite(relation_image(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc13_finset_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X6] :
( ~ relation(X6)
| relation_image(X6,relation_dom(X6)) = relation_rng(X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t146_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk2_0)
& function(esk2_0)
& finite(relation_dom(esk2_0))
& ~ finite(relation_rng(esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( finite(relation_image(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ finite(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( relation_image(X1,relation_dom(X1)) = relation_rng(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ finite(relation_rng(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( finite(relation_rng(X1))
| ~ finite(relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
finite(relation_dom(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
function(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.84 % Problem : SEU303+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.84 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/1.31 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/1.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/1.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/1.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/1.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/1.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/1.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/1.31 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 12:12:11 EDT 2023
% 0.14/1.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.46/1.54 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.46/1.56 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.46/1.56 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.56 % Proof found
% 0.46/1.56 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.56 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.46/1.56 % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.46/1.56 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/1.56 % Total time : 0.008000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------