TSTP Solution File: SEU296+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU296+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.79s 1.99s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SEU296+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:22:07 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.39 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.39 Sun Jun 19 20:22:07 2022
% 0.21/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4821.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -empty(A)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -empty(A)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,positive_rationals)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,positive_rationals)| -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -function_yielding(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(B,A)).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -function_yielding(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|function(relation_composition(B,A)).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -finite(A)|finite(set_intersection2(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 82 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 83 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 84 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 82 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 82 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 83 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 80 during input processing: 0 [copy,80,flip.1] {-} set_intersection2(A,B)=set_intersection2(B,A).
% 0.21/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 179 during input processing: 0 [copy,179,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.39 179 back subsumes 79.
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 76
% 0.21/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 176
% 0.21/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 43
% 0.21/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 63
% 0.21/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 58
% 0.21/0.44 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.21/0.44 distinct function count: 12
% 0.21/0.44 distinct constant count: 26
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.79/1.99 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.79/1.99 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.79/1.99 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 9 [ 1 1 11505 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 10 [ 3 1 1935 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 11 [ 4 0 519 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 12 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 13 [ 4 1 3134 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 14 [ 1 0 3138 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 15 [ 5 1 1956 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 16 [ 1 1 7791 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 17 [ 1 0 1717 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 18 [ 4 0 8751 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 19 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 20 [ 3 1 3806 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 true clauses given 3 (13.6%)
% 1.79/1.99 false clauses given 19
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 FALSE TRUE
% 1.79/1.99 2 17 47
% 1.79/1.99 3 9 26
% 1.79/1.99 4 0 15
% 1.79/1.99 5 5 6
% 1.79/1.99 6 0 5
% 1.79/1.99 7 2 0
% 1.79/1.99 8 0 1
% 1.79/1.99 9 0 4
% 1.79/1.99 10 0 2
% 1.79/1.99 11 0 1
% 1.79/1.99 12 0 1
% 1.79/1.99 tot: 33 108 (76.6% true)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 Model 20 [ 3 1 3806 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 1.79/1.99 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.79/1.99 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.79/1.99 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99
% 1.79/1.99 The job finished Sun Jun 19 20:22:09 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------