TSTP Solution File: SEU296+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU296+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.34s 23.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  155 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  182 (  78   ~;  70   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   6 sgn  42   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t160_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_image(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t160_relat_1) ).

fof(d1_finset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( finite(X1)
    <=> ? [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
          & function(X2)
          & relation_rng(X2) = X1
          & in(relation_dom(X2),omega) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_finset_1) ).

fof(t17_finset_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( finite(X1)
       => finite(relation_image(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t17_finset_1) ).

fof(t145_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => relation_image(X2,X1) = relation_image(X2,set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t145_relat_1) ).

fof(t46_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( relation(X2)
         => ( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
           => relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t46_relat_1) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_subset) ).

fof(t17_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t17_xboole_1) ).

fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1)
        & relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
        & function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc1_funct_1) ).

fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & relation(X2) )
     => relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_relat_1) ).

fof(fc10_finset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( finite(X2)
     => finite(set_intersection2(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc10_finset_1) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X3)
      | ~ relation(X4)
      | relation_rng(relation_composition(X3,X4)) = relation_image(X4,relation_rng(X3)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t160_relat_1])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X3,X5] :
      ( ( relation(esk22_1(X3))
        | ~ finite(X3) )
      & ( function(esk22_1(X3))
        | ~ finite(X3) )
      & ( relation_rng(esk22_1(X3)) = X3
        | ~ finite(X3) )
      & ( in(relation_dom(esk22_1(X3)),omega)
        | ~ finite(X3) )
      & ( ~ relation(X5)
        | ~ function(X5)
        | relation_rng(X5) != X3
        | ~ in(relation_dom(X5),omega)
        | finite(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_finset_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( relation(X2)
          & function(X2) )
       => ( finite(X1)
         => finite(relation_image(X2,X1)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t17_finset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X4)
      | relation_image(X4,X3) = relation_image(X4,set_intersection2(relation_dom(X4),X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t145_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( relation_rng(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_image(X2,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( relation_rng(esk22_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( relation(esk22_1(X1))
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk2_0)
    & function(esk2_0)
    & finite(esk1_0)
    & ~ finite(relation_image(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( relation_image(X1,X2) = relation_image(X1,set_intersection2(relation_dom(X1),X2))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( relation_image(X1,X2) = relation_rng(relation_composition(esk22_1(X2),X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ finite(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X3)
      | ~ relation(X4)
      | ~ subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_dom(X4))
      | relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X4)) = relation_dom(X3) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t46_relat_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(relation_image(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( relation_image(X1,X2) = relation_rng(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(X1),X2)),X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ finite(set_intersection2(relation_dom(X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( finite(X1)
    | ~ in(relation_dom(X2),omega)
    | relation_rng(X2) != X1
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ element(X3,powerset(X4))
        | subset(X3,X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
        | element(X3,powerset(X4)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : subset(set_intersection2(X3,X4),X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t17_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ finite(relation_rng(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),esk2_0)))
    | ~ finite(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( finite(relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(relation_dom(X1),omega) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( relation_dom(relation_composition(esk22_1(X1),X2)) = relation_dom(esk22_1(X1))
    | ~ subset(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ relation(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),esk2_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),esk2_0))
    | ~ finite(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0))
    | ~ in(relation_dom(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),esk2_0)),omega) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( relation_dom(relation_composition(esk22_1(X1),X2)) = relation_dom(esk22_1(X1))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ finite(X1)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(relation_dom(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    element(set_intersection2(X1,X2),powerset(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( in(relation_dom(esk22_1(X1)),omega)
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( relation(relation_composition(X3,X4))
        | ~ relation(X3)
        | ~ function(X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) )
      & ( function(relation_composition(X3,X4))
        | ~ relation(X3)
        | ~ function(X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ relation(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),esk2_0))
    | ~ function(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),esk2_0))
    | ~ finite(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_23]),c_0_36])]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( function(relation_composition(X2,X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( function(esk22_1(X1))
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X3)
      | ~ relation(X4)
      | relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ relation(relation_composition(esk22_1(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),esk2_0))
    | ~ finite(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_23]),c_0_41])]),c_0_42]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).

fof(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ finite(X4)
      | finite(set_intersection2(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc10_finset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(set_intersection2(relation_dom(esk2_0),esk1_0)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_23])]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( finite(set_intersection2(X1,X2))
    | ~ finite(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    finite(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : SEU296+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 09:14:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.52  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.34/23.52  
% 0.34/23.52  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.34/23.52  # OLD status Res
% 0.34/23.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.34/23.52  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.34/23.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.34/23.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 0.34/23.52  
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof found!
% 0.34/23.52  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.34/23.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object total steps             : 51
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object clause steps            : 30
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object formula steps           : 21
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object conjectures             : 13
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 18
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object generating inferences   : 12
% 0.34/23.52  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 18
% 0.34/23.52  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.34/23.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 75
% 0.34/23.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
% 0.34/23.52  # Initial clauses                      : 145
% 0.34/23.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.34/23.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 142
% 0.34/23.52  # Processed clauses                    : 1187
% 0.34/23.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 15
% 0.34/23.52  # ...subsumed                          : 563
% 0.34/23.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 609
% 0.34/23.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.34/23.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.34/23.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 41
% 0.34/23.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 177
% 0.34/23.52  # Generated clauses                    : 4051
% 0.34/23.52  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 3526
% 0.34/23.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 402
% 0.34/23.52  # Paramodulations                      : 3779
% 0.34/23.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.34/23.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 0.34/23.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 388
% 0.34/23.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 132
% 0.34/23.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.34/23.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 49
% 0.34/23.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 206
% 0.34/23.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1427
% 0.34/23.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 6422
% 0.34/23.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.34/23.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 218
% 0.34/23.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34350
% 0.34/23.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21020
% 0.34/23.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 939
% 0.34/23.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8903
% 0.34/23.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 1
% 0.34/23.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 101
% 0.34/23.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 90
% 0.34/23.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.34/23.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.34/23.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 46604
% 0.34/23.52  
% 0.34/23.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.34/23.52  # User time                : 0.073 s
% 0.34/23.52  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.34/23.52  # Total time               : 0.074 s
% 0.34/23.52  # Maximum resident set size: 5540 pages
% 0.34/46.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/46.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/46.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------