TSTP Solution File: SEU294+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU294+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:58:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.56s 2.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   52
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   61 (   5 unt;  49 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (   8   ~;   6   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   27 (  24   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   19 (  18 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   31 (  31 usr;  25 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > element > transfinite_sequence > relation_non_empty > relation_empty_yielding > relation > ordinal_yielding > ordinal > one_to_one > natural > function_yielding > function > finite > epsilon_transitive > epsilon_connected > empty > being_limit_ordinal > #nlpp > powerset > positive_rationals > empty_set > #skF_9 > #skF_18 > #skF_11 > #skF_15 > #skF_1 > #skF_25 > #skF_19 > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_16 > #skF_26 > #skF_14 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_13 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_21 > #skF_8 > #skF_4 > #skF_17 > #skF_22 > #skF_28 > #skF_24 > #skF_27 > #skF_23 > #skF_12 > #skF_20

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(epsilon_connected,type,
    epsilon_connected: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i > $i ).

tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff(positive_rationals,type,
    positive_rationals: $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff(relation_non_empty,type,
    relation_non_empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_25',type,
    '#skF_25': $i ).

tff(epsilon_transitive,type,
    epsilon_transitive: $i > $o ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(finite,type,
    finite: $i > $o ).

tff(one_to_one,type,
    one_to_one: $i > $o ).

tff(ordinal_yielding,type,
    ordinal_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff(function,type,
    function: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(relation_empty_yielding,type,
    relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i ).

tff(ordinal,type,
    ordinal: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_26',type,
    '#skF_26': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(function_yielding,type,
    function_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff(being_limit_ordinal,type,
    being_limit_ordinal: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': $i ).

tff('#skF_28',type,
    '#skF_28': $i ).

tff('#skF_24',type,
    '#skF_24': $i ).

tff('#skF_27',type,
    '#skF_27': $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': $i ).

tff(powerset,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

tff(natural,type,
    natural: $i > $o ).

tff(transfinite_sequence,type,
    transfinite_sequence: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i > $i ).

tff(f_346,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( ( subset(A,B)
          & finite(B) )
       => finite(A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t13_finset_1) ).

tff(f_360,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( element(A,powerset(B))
    <=> subset(A,B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

tff(f_79,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( finite(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( element(B,powerset(A))
         => finite(B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc2_finset_1) ).

tff(c_258,plain,
    ~ finite('#skF_27'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_346]) ).

tff(c_260,plain,
    finite('#skF_28'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_346]) ).

tff(c_262,plain,
    subset('#skF_27','#skF_28'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_346]) ).

tff(c_270,plain,
    ! [A_35,B_36] :
      ( element(A_35,powerset(B_36))
      | ~ subset(A_35,B_36) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_360]) ).

tff(c_766,plain,
    ! [B_108,A_109] :
      ( finite(B_108)
      | ~ element(B_108,powerset(A_109))
      | ~ finite(A_109) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_802,plain,
    ! [A_113,B_114] :
      ( finite(A_113)
      | ~ finite(B_114)
      | ~ subset(A_113,B_114) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_766]) ).

tff(c_820,plain,
    ( finite('#skF_27')
    | ~ finite('#skF_28') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_262,c_802]) ).

tff(c_829,plain,
    finite('#skF_27'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_260,c_820]) ).

tff(c_831,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_258,c_829]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : SEU294+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:32:29 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.56/2.26  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.91/2.26  
% 5.91/2.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.95/2.29  
% 5.95/2.29  Inference rules
% 5.95/2.29  ----------------------
% 5.95/2.29  #Ref     : 0
% 5.95/2.29  #Sup     : 101
% 5.95/2.29  #Fact    : 0
% 5.95/2.29  #Define  : 0
% 5.95/2.29  #Split   : 3
% 5.95/2.29  #Chain   : 0
% 5.95/2.29  #Close   : 0
% 5.95/2.29  
% 5.95/2.29  Ordering : KBO
% 5.95/2.29  
% 5.95/2.29  Simplification rules
% 5.95/2.29  ----------------------
% 5.95/2.29  #Subsume      : 24
% 5.95/2.29  #Demod        : 107
% 5.95/2.29  #Tautology    : 82
% 5.95/2.29  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 5.95/2.29  #BackRed      : 36
% 5.95/2.29  
% 5.95/2.29  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.95/2.29  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.95/2.29  
% 5.95/2.29  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.95/2.29  ----------------------
% 5.95/2.29  Preprocessing        : 0.60
% 5.95/2.29  Parsing              : 0.32
% 5.95/2.29  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 5.95/2.29  Main loop            : 0.61
% 5.95/2.29  Inferencing          : 0.22
% 5.95/2.29  Reduction            : 0.20
% 5.95/2.29  Demodulation         : 0.14
% 5.95/2.29  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 5.95/2.29  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 5.95/2.29  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 5.95/2.29  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.95/2.29  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.95/2.29  Total                : 1.26
% 5.95/2.29  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.95/2.29  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.95/2.29  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.95/2.29  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------