TSTP Solution File: SEU290+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU290+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:20:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.57s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  12 unt;   1 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (   8 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ element(X,powerset(cartesian_product2(Y,Z)))
    | relation(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_relset_1) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X,Y,Z)
    | Z = empty_set
    | ~ quasi_total(X,Y,Z)
    | Y = relation_dom_as_subset(Y,Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_funct_2) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | Y != relation_rng(X)
    | in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
    | Z != apply(X,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X,Y,Z)
    | element(X,powerset(cartesian_product2(Y,Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m2_relset_1) ).

cnf(62,axiom,
    ( ~ relation_of2(X,Y,Z)
    | relation_dom_as_subset(Y,Z,X) = relation_dom(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k4_relset_1) ).

cnf(63,axiom,
    ( ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X,Y,Z)
    | relation_of2(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_m2_relset_1) ).

cnf(73,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV24'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_funct_2) ).

cnf(74,negated_conjecture,
    quasi_total('SKOLEMAAAV24','SKOLEMAAAV21','SKOLEMAAAV22'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_funct_2) ).

cnf(75,negated_conjecture,
    relation_of2_as_subset('SKOLEMAAAV24','SKOLEMAAAV21','SKOLEMAAAV22'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_funct_2) ).

cnf(76,negated_conjecture,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV23','SKOLEMAAAV21'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_funct_2) ).

cnf(77,negated_conjecture,
    'SKOLEMAAAV22' != empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_funct_2) ).

cnf(78,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(apply('SKOLEMAAAV24','SKOLEMAAAV23'),relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV24')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_funct_2) ).

cnf(108,plain,
    relation_of2('SKOLEMAAAV24','SKOLEMAAAV21','SKOLEMAAAV22'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[63,75]) ).

cnf(141,plain,
    element('SKOLEMAAAV24',powerset(cartesian_product2('SKOLEMAAAV21','SKOLEMAAAV22'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[18,75]) ).

cnf(149,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV21' = relation_dom_as_subset('SKOLEMAAAV21','SKOLEMAAAV22','SKOLEMAAAV24'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,75,77,74]) ).

cnf(220,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV21' = relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV24'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[62,108]),149,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1828,plain,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV24'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,141]) ).

cnf(1834,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,1828,73,78,theory(equality),theory(equality)]),76,220,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU290+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 23:25:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T23:25:07
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T23:25:07
% 0.20/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.50     |one_to_one| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.50     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.57/0.76  
% 0.57/0.76  
% 0.57/0.76  #||
% 0.57/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.76  ||#
% 0.57/0.76  
% 0.57/0.76  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.57/0.76  ;      2321 formulas have been input or derived (from 185 formulas).
% 0.57/0.76  ;      1834 (79%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.57/0.76  ;           35 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.57/0.76  ;         1799 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.57/0.76  ; 
% 0.57/0.76  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.009   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.004   1%   Assert                       (55 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.114  40%   Process new row              (2,196 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.066  23%   Resolution                   (368 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.002   1%   Paramodulation               (184 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.002   1%   Condensing                   (92 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.001   0%   Forward subsumption          (92 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.003   1%   Backward subsumption         (82 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (18 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.026   9%   Forward simplification       (2,140 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.020   7%   Backward simplification      (1,834 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (153 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.036  13%   Other
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.283        Total
% 0.57/0.76  ;     0.286        Real time
% 0.57/0.76  ; 
% 0.57/0.76  ; Term-hash-array has 3,511 terms in all.
% 0.57/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 77 entries (77 at peak, 82 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.57/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 395 nodes (395 at peak, 441 added, 46 deleted).
% 0.57/0.76  ;  Retrieved 17 possibly forward subsuming rows in 92 calls.
% 0.57/0.76  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 82 calls.
% 0.57/0.76  ; Path-index has 3,491 entries (3,491 at peak, 3,540 added, 49 deleted).
% 0.57/0.76  ; Path-index has 1,709 nodes (1,709 at peak, 1,761 added, 52 deleted).
% 0.57/0.76  ; Trie-index has 3,491 entries (3,491 at peak, 3,540 added, 49 deleted).
% 0.57/0.76  ; Trie-index has 6,260 nodes (6,260 at peak, 6,356 added, 96 deleted).
% 0.57/0.76  ; Retrieved 529 generalization terms in 2,884 calls.
% 0.57/0.76  ; Retrieved 1,765 instance terms in 1,751 calls.
% 0.57/0.76  ; Retrieved 77,115 unifiable terms in 6,633 calls.
% 0.57/0.76  ; 
% 0.57/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 0.57/0.76  ;     2 with value 20              2 with value 24               1 with value 28
% 0.57/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1629 entries:
% 0.57/0.76  ;     1 with value (4 9)         176 with value (4 16)           1 with value (4 24)
% 0.57/0.76  ;    54 with value (4 10)         44 with value (4 17)           3 with value (4 26)
% 0.57/0.76  ;   140 with value (4 11)          8 with value (4 18)           5 with value (4 29)
% 0.57/0.76  ;   191 with value (4 12)          8 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 33)
% 0.57/0.76  ;   310 with value (4 13)          1 with value (4 20)           2 with value (4 35)
% 0.57/0.76  ;   391 with value (4 14)          3 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 39)
% 0.57/0.76  ;   284 with value (4 15)          3 with value (4 23)
% 0.57/0.76  Evaluation took:
% 0.57/0.76    0.287 seconds of real time
% 0.57/0.76    0.259301 seconds of user run time
% 0.57/0.76    0.026081 seconds of system run time
% 0.57/0.76    [Run times include 0.014 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.57/0.76    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.57/0.76    0 page faults and
% 0.57/0.76    17,241,640 bytes consed.
% 0.57/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.57/0.76  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T23:25:08
% 0.57/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.57/0.76  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------