TSTP Solution File: SEU288+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU288+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.94s 1.14s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU288+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 19:20:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.35/0.52 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.35/0.52 The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.35/0.52 Sat Jun 18 19:20:43 2022
% 0.35/0.52 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 16888.
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.35/0.52 set(auto).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.35/0.52 clear(print_given).
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 formula_list(usable).
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=12.
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.35/0.52 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.35/0.52 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.35/0.52 clauses in usable.
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.35/0.52 assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.35/0.52 paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.35/0.52 dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.35/0.52
% 0.35/0.52 ------------> process usable:
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 301 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 296 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 294 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 311 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 301 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 303 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_rng_restriction(B,A)).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 375 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 376 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 377 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 132 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 358 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 359 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 354 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 355 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.35/0.52 Following clause subsumed by 372 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 373 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 347 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1020 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 175 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 374 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 0.94/1.12 164 back subsumes 161.
% 0.94/1.12 1018 back subsumes 133.
% 0.94/1.12 1051 back subsumes 250.
% 0.94/1.12 1052 back subsumes 251.
% 0.94/1.12 1163 back subsumes 380.
% 0.94/1.12 1164 back subsumes 379.
% 0.94/1.12 1165 back subsumes 381.
% 0.94/1.12 1168 back subsumes 176.
% 0.94/1.12 1186 back subsumes 1185.
% 0.94/1.12 1194 back subsumes 1193.
% 0.94/1.12
% 0.94/1.12 ------------> process sos:
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1847 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1843 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1848 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1849 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1847 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1847 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1848 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1808 during input processing: 0 [copy,1808,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1809 during input processing: 0 [copy,1809,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.94/1.12 1895 back subsumes 1605.
% 0.94/1.12 1895 back subsumes 1604.
% 0.94/1.12 1895 back subsumes 1303.
% 0.94/1.12 1895 back subsumes 1222.
% 0.94/1.12 1895 back subsumes 1221.
% 0.94/1.12 1895 back subsumes 1207.
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1896 during input processing: 0 [copy,1896,flip.1] {-} equipotent(A,A).
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1982 during input processing: 0 [copy,1982,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1794.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1791.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1788.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1785.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1649.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1644.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1606.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1603.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1589.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1585.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1581.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1577.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1300.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1299.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1262.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1233.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1227.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1220.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1210.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1209.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1203.
% 0.94/1.12 1982 back subsumes 1183.
% 0.94/1.12 Following clause subsumed by 1983 during input processing: 0 [copy,1983,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 0.94/1.12 2099 back subsumes 128.
% 0.94/1.12 2101 back subsumes 129.
% 0.94/1.12 2247 back subsumes 1987.
% 0.94/1.12 2248 back subsumes 1988.
% 0.94/1.12 2249 back subsumes 1989.
% 0.94/1.12 2250 back subsumes 1990.
% 0.94/1.12 2251 back subsumes 1991.
% 0.94/1.12 2252 back subsumes 1992.
% 0.94/1.12 2253 back subsumes 1993.
% 0.94/1.12 2254 back subsumes 1994.
% 0.94/1.12 2255 back subsumes 1995.
% 0.94/1.12 2256 back subsumes 1996.
% 0.94/1.12 2257 back subsumes 2000.
% 0.94/1.12 2258 back subsumes 2001.
% 0.94/1.12 2259 back subsumes 2004.
% 0.94/1.12 2260 back subsumes 2005.
% 0.94/1.12 2261 back subsumes 2007.
% 0.94/1.12 2262 back subsumes 2008.
% 0.94/1.12 2263 back subsumes 2010.
% 0.94/1.12 2264 back subsumes 2011.
% 0.94/1.12 2265 back subsumes 2013.
% 0.94/1.12 2266 back subsumes 2014.
% 0.94/1.12 2267 back subsumes 2016.
% 0.94/1.12 2268 back subsumes 2017.
% 0.94/1.12 2269 back subsumes 2019.
% 0.94/1.12 2270 back subsumes 2020.
% 0.94/1.12 2271 back subsumes 2022.
% 0.94/1.12 2272 back subsumes 2023.
% 0.94/1.12 2273 back subsumes 2025.
% 0.94/1.12 2274 back subsumes 2026.
% 0.94/1.12
% 0.94/1.12 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.94/1.13
% 0.94/1.13 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.94/1.13 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.94/1.13 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.94/1.13 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.94/1.13
% 0.94/1.13
% 0.94/1.13 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.94/1.13 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.94/1.13 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.94/1.13 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.94/1.13
% 0.94/1.13
% 0.94/1.13 The job finished Sat Jun 18 19:20:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------