TSTP Solution File: SEU284+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU284+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.34s 22.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 222 ( 130 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 104 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 257 ( 77 ~; 130 |; 45 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 39 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 14 sgn 15 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(s2_funct_1__e16_22__wellord2__1,lemma,
! [X1] :
( ( ! [X2,X3,X4] :
( ( in(X2,X1)
& X3 = singleton(X2)
& X4 = singleton(X2) )
=> X3 = X4 )
& ! [X2] :
~ ( in(X2,X1)
& ! [X3] : X3 != singleton(X2) ) )
=> ? [X2] :
( relation(X2)
& function(X2)
& relation_dom(X2) = X1
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> apply(X2,X3) = singleton(X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',s2_funct_1__e16_22__wellord2__1) ).
fof(s3_funct_1__e16_22__wellord2,conjecture,
! [X1] :
? [X2] :
( relation(X2)
& function(X2)
& relation_dom(X2) = X1
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> apply(X2,X3) = singleton(X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',s3_funct_1__e16_22__wellord2) ).
fof(c_0_2,lemma,
! [X5,X10,X12] :
( ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| in(esk17_1(X5),X5) )
& ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk19_1(X5) = singleton(esk17_1(X5)) )
& ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| in(esk20_1(X5),X5)
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) )
& ( relation(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) )
& ( function(esk21_1(X5))
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) )
& ( relation_dom(esk21_1(X5)) = X5
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X12,X5)
| apply(esk21_1(X5),X12) = singleton(X12)
| X10 != singleton(esk20_1(X5))
| esk18_1(X5) != esk19_1(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[s2_funct_1__e16_22__wellord2__1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
? [X2] :
( relation(X2)
& function(X2)
& relation_dom(X2) = X1
& ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> apply(X2,X3) = singleton(X3) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[s3_funct_1__e16_22__wellord2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,lemma,
( relation_dom(esk21_1(X1)) = X1
| esk18_1(X1) != esk19_1(X1)
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,lemma,
( esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation_dom(esk21_1(X1)) = X1
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,lemma,
( esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation_dom(esk21_1(X1)) = X1
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,lemma,
( relation(esk21_1(X1))
| esk18_1(X1) != esk19_1(X1)
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,lemma,
( esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation(esk21_1(X1))
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
( esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation(esk21_1(X1))
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,lemma,
( function(esk21_1(X1))
| esk18_1(X1) != esk19_1(X1)
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,lemma,
( esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| function(esk21_1(X1))
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
( esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| function(esk21_1(X1))
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
! [X5] :
( ( in(esk2_1(X5),esk1_0)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5)
| relation_dom(X5) != esk1_0 )
& ( apply(X5,esk2_1(X5)) != singleton(esk2_1(X5))
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5)
| relation_dom(X5) != esk1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,lemma,
( relation_dom(esk21_1(X1)) = X1
| esk19_1(X1) != esk18_1(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,lemma,
( esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation_dom(esk21_1(X1)) = X1 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
( esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation_dom(esk21_1(X1)) = X1 ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
( relation(esk21_1(X1))
| esk19_1(X1) != esk18_1(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,lemma,
( esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation(esk21_1(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
( esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| relation(esk21_1(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
( function(esk21_1(X1))
| esk19_1(X1) != esk18_1(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,lemma,
( esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| function(esk21_1(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,lemma,
( esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| function(esk21_1(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_1(X1),esk1_0)
| relation_dom(X1) != esk1_0
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
relation_dom(esk21_1(X1)) = X1,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
relation(esk21_1(X1)),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,lemma,
function(esk21_1(X1)),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,lemma,
( esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| apply(esk21_1(X1),X3) = singleton(X3)
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1))
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_1(esk21_1(X1)),esk1_0)
| X1 != esk1_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
( apply(esk21_1(X1),X3) = singleton(X3)
| esk18_1(X1) != esk19_1(X1)
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1))
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,lemma,
( apply(esk21_1(X1),X2) = singleton(X2)
| esk19_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0)),esk1_0),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,lemma,
( esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| apply(esk21_1(X1),X3) = singleton(X3)
| X2 != singleton(esk20_1(X1))
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
( apply(esk21_1(X1),X2) = singleton(X2)
| esk19_1(X1) != esk18_1(X1)
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(X1) != esk1_0
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,esk2_1(X1)) != singleton(esk2_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,lemma,
( apply(esk21_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0))) = singleton(esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0)))
| esk19_1(esk1_0) = singleton(esk17_1(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,lemma,
( apply(esk21_1(X1),X2) = singleton(X2)
| esk18_1(X1) = singleton(esk17_1(X1))
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
( apply(esk21_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0))) = singleton(esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0)))
| esk19_1(esk1_0) != esk18_1(esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
esk19_1(esk1_0) = singleton(esk17_1(esk1_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,lemma,
( apply(esk21_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0))) = singleton(esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0)))
| esk18_1(esk1_0) = singleton(esk17_1(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
apply(esk21_1(esk1_0),esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0))) = singleton(esk2_1(esk21_1(esk1_0))),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_40]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11 % Problem : SEU284+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 08:54:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.34/22.52 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.34/22.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.34/22.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 0.34/22.52
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof found!
% 0.34/22.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.34/22.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object total steps : 42
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object clause steps : 37
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object initial clauses used : 14
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object generating inferences : 22
% 0.34/22.52 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 16
% 0.34/22.52 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.34/22.52 # Parsed axioms : 371
% 0.34/22.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 303
% 0.34/22.52 # Initial clauses : 205
% 0.34/22.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.34/22.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 203
% 0.34/22.52 # Processed clauses : 23283
% 0.34/22.52 # ...of these trivial : 136
% 0.34/22.52 # ...subsumed : 8580
% 0.34/22.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 14567
% 0.34/22.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 46
% 0.34/22.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 493629
% 0.34/22.52 # Backward-subsumed : 357
% 0.34/22.52 # Backward-rewritten : 1810
% 0.34/22.52 # Generated clauses : 651872
% 0.34/22.52 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 641260
% 0.34/22.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6710
% 0.34/22.52 # Paramodulations : 649847
% 0.34/22.52 # Factorizations : 86
% 0.34/22.52 # Equation resolutions : 1935
% 0.34/22.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 12393
% 0.34/22.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 240
% 0.34/22.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.34/22.52 # Negative unit clauses : 62
% 0.34/22.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 12091
% 0.34/22.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 108416
% 0.34/22.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 481174
% 0.34/22.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.34/22.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 2168
% 0.34/22.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14839526
% 0.34/22.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4535613
% 0.34/22.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14893
% 0.34/22.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 104636
% 0.34/22.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.34/22.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 38785
% 0.34/22.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 443
% 0.34/22.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.34/22.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.34/22.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 26204049
% 0.34/22.52
% 0.34/22.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.34/22.52 # User time : 21.087 s
% 0.34/22.52 # System time : 0.160 s
% 0.34/22.52 # Total time : 21.247 s
% 0.34/22.52 # Maximum resident set size: 152400 pages
% 0.34/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------