TSTP Solution File: SEU277+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU277+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.46s 0.63s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SEU277+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:16:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.42 The process was started by sandbox2 on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.42 Mon Jun 20 10:16:55 2022
% 0.19/0.42 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23873.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.42 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.42 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.42 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.42 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.42 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 293 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 288 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 286 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 303 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 293 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 295 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_rng_restriction(B,A)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 365 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 366 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 367 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 348 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 349 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 346 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 347 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 362 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 363 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 339 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 565 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 173 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 364 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 0.40/0.62 162 back subsumes 159.
% 0.40/0.62 563 back subsumes 131.
% 0.40/0.62 596 back subsumes 242.
% 0.40/0.62 597 back subsumes 243.
% 0.40/0.62 708 back subsumes 370.
% 0.40/0.62 709 back subsumes 369.
% 0.40/0.62 710 back subsumes 371.
% 0.40/0.62 713 back subsumes 174.
% 0.40/0.62 731 back subsumes 730.
% 0.40/0.62 739 back subsumes 738.
% 0.40/0.62
% 0.40/0.62 ------------> process sos:
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1097 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1093 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1098 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1099 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1097 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1097 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1098 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1060 during input processing: 0 [copy,1060,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1061 during input processing: 0 [copy,1061,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.40/0.62 1145 back subsumes 941.
% 0.40/0.62 1145 back subsumes 940.
% 0.40/0.62 1145 back subsumes 847.
% 0.40/0.62 1145 back subsumes 766.
% 0.40/0.62 1145 back subsumes 765.
% 0.40/0.62 1145 back subsumes 751.
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1205 during input processing: 0 [copy,1205,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 985.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 980.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 942.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 939.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 844.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 843.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 806.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 777.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 771.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 764.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 754.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 753.
% 0.40/0.62 1205 back subsumes 728.
% 0.40/0.62 Following clause subsumed by 1206 during input processing: 0 [copy,1206,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 0.40/0.62 1322 back subsumes 126.
% 0.40/0.62 1324 back subsumes 127.
% 0.40/0.62 1373 back subsumes 1210.
% 0.40/0.62 1374 back subsumes 1211.
% 0.40/0.62 1375 back subsumes 1212.
% 0.40/0.62 1376 back subsumes 1213.
% 0.40/0.62 1377 back subsumes 1214.
% 0.40/0.62 1378 back subsumes 1215.
% 0.40/0.62 1379 back subsumes 1216.
% 0.40/0.62 1380 back subsumes 1217.
% 0.40/0.62 1381 back subsumes 1218.
% 0.40/0.62 1382 back subsumes 1219.
% 0.40/0.62 1383 back subsumes 1223.
% 0.40/0.62 1384 back subsumes 1224.
% 0.40/0.62 1385 back subsumes 1227.
% 0.40/0.62 1386 back subsumes 1228.
% 0.40/0.62 1387 back subsumes 1230.
% 0.40/0.62 1388 back subsumes 1231.
% 0.40/0.62 1389 back subsumes 1233.
% 0.40/0.62 1390 back subsumes 1234.
% 0.40/0.62 1391 back subsumes 1236.
% 0.40/0.62 1392 back subsumes 1237.
% 0.40/0.62 1393 back subsumes 1239.
% 0.40/0.62 1394 back subsumes 1240.
% 0.40/0.62 1395 back subsumes 1242.
% 0.40/0.62 1396 back subsumes 1243.
% 0.40/0.62 1397 back subsumes 1245.
% 0.40/0.62 1398 back subsumes 1246.
% 0.40/0.62 1399 back subsumes 1248.
% 0.40/0.62 1400 back subsumes 1249.
% 0.40/0.62
% 0.40/0.62 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.46/0.63 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.46/0.63 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.46/0.63 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.46/0.63 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.46/0.63 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.46/0.63 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63
% 0.46/0.63 The job finished Mon Jun 20 10:16:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------