TSTP Solution File: SEU276+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU276+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.39s 0.58s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU276+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 08:10:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.42 The process was started by sandbox2 on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.42 Mon Jun 20 08:10:31 2022
% 0.19/0.42 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11003.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.42 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.42 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.42 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.42 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.42 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.42 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 293 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 288 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 286 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 303 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 293 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 295 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_rng_restriction(B,A)).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 365 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 366 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 367 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 348 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 349 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 346 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 347 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 362 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 363 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 0.19/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 339 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 514 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 173 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 364 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 0.39/0.58 162 back subsumes 159.
% 0.39/0.58 512 back subsumes 131.
% 0.39/0.58 544 back subsumes 242.
% 0.39/0.58 545 back subsumes 243.
% 0.39/0.58 656 back subsumes 370.
% 0.39/0.58 657 back subsumes 369.
% 0.39/0.58 658 back subsumes 371.
% 0.39/0.58 661 back subsumes 174.
% 0.39/0.58 679 back subsumes 678.
% 0.39/0.58 687 back subsumes 686.
% 0.39/0.58
% 0.39/0.58 ------------> process sos:
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 990 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 986 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 991 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 992 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 990 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 990 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 991 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 953 during input processing: 0 [copy,953,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 954 during input processing: 0 [copy,954,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.39/0.58 1038 back subsumes 842.
% 0.39/0.58 1038 back subsumes 841.
% 0.39/0.58 1038 back subsumes 795.
% 0.39/0.58 1038 back subsumes 714.
% 0.39/0.58 1038 back subsumes 713.
% 0.39/0.58 1038 back subsumes 699.
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 1094 during input processing: 0 [copy,1094,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 886.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 881.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 843.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 840.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 792.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 791.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 754.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 725.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 719.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 712.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 702.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 701.
% 0.39/0.58 1094 back subsumes 676.
% 0.39/0.58 Following clause subsumed by 1095 during input processing: 0 [copy,1095,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 0.39/0.58 1211 back subsumes 126.
% 0.39/0.58 1213 back subsumes 127.
% 0.39/0.58 1261 back subsumes 1099.
% 0.39/0.58 1262 back subsumes 1100.
% 0.39/0.58 1263 back subsumes 1101.
% 0.39/0.58 1264 back subsumes 1102.
% 0.39/0.58 1265 back subsumes 1103.
% 0.39/0.58 1266 back subsumes 1104.
% 0.39/0.58 1267 back subsumes 1105.
% 0.39/0.58 1268 back subsumes 1106.
% 0.39/0.58 1269 back subsumes 1107.
% 0.39/0.58 1270 back subsumes 1108.
% 0.39/0.58 1271 back subsumes 1112.
% 0.39/0.58 1272 back subsumes 1113.
% 0.39/0.58 1273 back subsumes 1116.
% 0.39/0.58 1274 back subsumes 1117.
% 0.39/0.58 1275 back subsumes 1119.
% 0.39/0.58 1276 back subsumes 1120.
% 0.39/0.58 1277 back subsumes 1122.
% 0.39/0.58 1278 back subsumes 1123.
% 0.39/0.58 1279 back subsumes 1125.
% 0.39/0.58 1280 back subsumes 1126.
% 0.39/0.58 1281 back subsumes 1128.
% 0.39/0.58 1282 back subsumes 1129.
% 0.39/0.58 1283 back subsumes 1131.
% 0.39/0.58 1284 back subsumes 1132.
% 0.39/0.58 1285 back subsumes 1134.
% 0.39/0.58 1286 back subsumes 1135.
% 0.39/0.58 1287 back subsumes 1137.
% 0.39/0.58 1288 back subsumes 1138.
% 0.39/0.58
% 0.39/0.58 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.39/0.58
% 0.39/0.58 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.39/0.58 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.39/0.58 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.39/0.58 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.39/0.58
% 0.39/0.58
% 0.39/0.58 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.39/0.58 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.39/0.58 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.39/0.58 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.39/0.58
% 0.39/0.58
% 0.39/0.58 The job finished Mon Jun 20 08:10:31 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------