TSTP Solution File: SEU275+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU275+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:58:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.07s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  16 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  22   ~;  14   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (;  15   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ well_ordering > well_founded_relation > transitive > relation > reflexive > ordinal > epsilon_transitive > epsilon_connected > connected > antisymmetric > #nlpp > inclusion_relation > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(well_ordering,type,
    well_ordering: $i > $o ).

tff(epsilon_connected,type,
    epsilon_connected: $i > $o ).

tff(antisymmetric,type,
    antisymmetric: $i > $o ).

tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff(connected,type,
    connected: $i > $o ).

tff(epsilon_transitive,type,
    epsilon_transitive: $i > $o ).

tff(inclusion_relation,type,
    inclusion_relation: $i > $i ).

tff(ordinal,type,
    ordinal: $i > $o ).

tff(well_founded_relation,type,
    well_founded_relation: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(transitive,type,
    transitive: $i > $o ).

tff(reflexive,type,
    reflexive: $i > $o ).

tff(f_79,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( ordinal(A)
       => well_ordering(inclusion_relation(A)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_wellord2) ).

tff(f_74,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ordinal(A)
     => well_founded_relation(inclusion_relation(A)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_wellord2) ).

tff(f_68,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ordinal(A)
     => connected(inclusion_relation(A)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_wellord2) ).

tff(f_54,axiom,
    ! [A] : relation(inclusion_relation(A)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_wellord2) ).

tff(f_62,axiom,
    ! [A] : reflexive(inclusion_relation(A)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_wellord2) ).

tff(f_64,axiom,
    ! [A] : transitive(inclusion_relation(A)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_wellord2) ).

tff(f_70,axiom,
    ! [A] : antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(A)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t5_wellord2) ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ( well_ordering(A)
      <=> ( reflexive(A)
          & transitive(A)
          & antisymmetric(A)
          & connected(A)
          & well_founded_relation(A) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_wellord1) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ordinal('#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [A_9] :
      ( well_founded_relation(inclusion_relation(A_9))
      | ~ ordinal(A_9) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [A_7] :
      ( connected(inclusion_relation(A_7))
      | ~ ordinal(A_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_68]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [A_4] : relation(inclusion_relation(A_4)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [A_5] : reflexive(inclusion_relation(A_5)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_62]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ! [A_6] : transitive(inclusion_relation(A_6)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_64]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [A_8] : antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(A_8)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_81,plain,
    ! [A_24] :
      ( well_ordering(A_24)
      | ~ well_founded_relation(A_24)
      | ~ connected(A_24)
      | ~ antisymmetric(A_24)
      | ~ transitive(A_24)
      | ~ reflexive(A_24)
      | ~ relation(A_24) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ~ well_ordering(inclusion_relation('#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(inclusion_relation('#skF_2'))
    | ~ connected(inclusion_relation('#skF_2'))
    | ~ antisymmetric(inclusion_relation('#skF_2'))
    | ~ transitive(inclusion_relation('#skF_2'))
    | ~ reflexive(inclusion_relation('#skF_2'))
    | ~ relation(inclusion_relation('#skF_2')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_38]) ).

tff(c_107,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(inclusion_relation('#skF_2'))
    | ~ connected(inclusion_relation('#skF_2')) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_28,c_30,c_34,c_99]) ).

tff(c_108,plain,
    ~ connected(inclusion_relation('#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_107]) ).

tff(c_111,plain,
    ~ ordinal('#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_108]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_40,c_111]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    ~ well_founded_relation(inclusion_relation('#skF_2')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_107]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    ~ ordinal('#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_116]) ).

tff(c_124,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_40,c_120]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SEU275+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:37:48 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.07/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.07/1.73  
% 3.07/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.07/1.76  
% 3.07/1.76  Inference rules
% 3.07/1.76  ----------------------
% 3.07/1.76  #Ref     : 0
% 3.07/1.76  #Sup     : 14
% 3.07/1.76  #Fact    : 0
% 3.07/1.76  #Define  : 0
% 3.07/1.76  #Split   : 1
% 3.07/1.76  #Chain   : 0
% 3.07/1.76  #Close   : 0
% 3.07/1.76  
% 3.07/1.76  Ordering : KBO
% 3.07/1.76  
% 3.07/1.76  Simplification rules
% 3.07/1.76  ----------------------
% 3.07/1.76  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.07/1.76  #Demod        : 8
% 3.07/1.76  #Tautology    : 9
% 3.07/1.76  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.07/1.76  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.07/1.76  
% 3.07/1.76  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.07/1.76  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.07/1.76  
% 3.07/1.76  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.07/1.76  ----------------------
% 3.07/1.76  Preprocessing        : 0.45
% 3.07/1.76  Parsing              : 0.25
% 3.07/1.76  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.07/1.76  Main loop            : 0.24
% 3.07/1.76  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.07/1.76  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.07/1.76  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.07/1.76  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.07/1.76  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 3.07/1.76  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.07/1.76  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.07/1.76  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.07/1.76  Total                : 0.74
% 3.07/1.76  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.07/1.76  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.07/1.76  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.07/1.76  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------