TSTP Solution File: SEU269+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU269+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 2.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 41 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 159 ( 23 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 33 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 192 ( 74 ~; 93 |; 15 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 77 ( 4 sgn 32 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l2_wellord1,lemma,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( transitive(X1)
<=> ! [X2,X3,X4] :
( ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
& in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) )
=> in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',l2_wellord1) ).
fof(dt_k1_wellord2,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_wellord2) ).
fof(d1_wellord2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = inclusion_relation(X1)
<=> ( relation_field(X2) = X1
& ! [X3,X4] :
( ( in(X3,X1)
& in(X4,X1) )
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> subset(X3,X4) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d1_wellord2) ).
fof(t30_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_field(X3))
& in(X2,relation_field(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t30_relat_1) ).
fof(t1_xboole_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X3) )
=> subset(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).
fof(t3_wellord2,conjecture,
! [X1] : transitive(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t3_wellord2) ).
fof(c_0_6,lemma,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ~ transitive(X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X6,X7),X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X5)
| in(ordered_pair(X6,X8),X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(X5),esk3_1(X5)),X5)
| transitive(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(X5),esk4_1(X5)),X5)
| transitive(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(X5),esk4_1(X5)),X5)
| transitive(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l2_wellord1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X2] : relation(inclusion_relation(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_wellord2]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( relation_field(X6) = X5
| X6 != inclusion_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| subset(X7,X8)
| ~ in(X7,X5)
| ~ in(X8,X5)
| X6 != inclusion_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ subset(X7,X8)
| in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| ~ in(X7,X5)
| ~ in(X8,X5)
| X6 != inclusion_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(esk5_2(X5,X6),X5)
| relation_field(X6) != X5
| X6 = inclusion_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(esk6_2(X5,X6),X5)
| relation_field(X6) != X5
| X6 = inclusion_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X5,X6),esk6_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| ~ subset(esk5_2(X5,X6),esk6_2(X5,X6))
| relation_field(X6) != X5
| X6 = inclusion_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X5,X6),esk6_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| subset(esk5_2(X5,X6),esk6_2(X5,X6))
| relation_field(X6) != X5
| X6 = inclusion_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_wellord2])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
( transitive(X1)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(X1),esk4_1(X1)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
relation(inclusion_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,relation_field(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X5,relation_field(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t30_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
( transitive(X1)
| in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(X1),esk3_1(X1)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( relation_field(X1) = X2
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( subset(X4,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X2)
| ~ in(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X4,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1))),inclusion_relation(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
( in(X3,relation_field(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1))),inclusion_relation(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
relation_field(inclusion_relation(X1)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),c_0_10])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ~ subset(X5,X6)
| subset(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_xboole_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| subset(esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1)))
| inclusion_relation(X1) != inclusion_relation(X2)
| ~ in(esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X2)
| ~ in(esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]),c_0_18]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_field(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| subset(esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1))) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| subset(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1)))
| inclusion_relation(X1) != inclusion_relation(X2)
| ~ in(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X2)
| ~ in(esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_17]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| subset(X2,esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1)))
| ~ subset(X2,esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| subset(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk3_1(inclusion_relation(X1))) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X2)
| ~ in(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X4,X2)
| ~ subset(X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| subset(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1))),X2)
| X2 != inclusion_relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X3)
| ~ in(esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
fof(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : transitive(inclusion_relation(X1)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_wellord2]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1))),X2)
| X2 != inclusion_relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_27]),c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ transitive(inclusion_relation(esk1_0)),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,lemma,
( transitive(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(X1),esk4_1(X1)),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
( transitive(inclusion_relation(X1))
| in(ordered_pair(esk2_1(inclusion_relation(X1)),esk4_1(inclusion_relation(X1))),inclusion_relation(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ transitive(inclusion_relation(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,lemma,
transitive(inclusion_relation(X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU269+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:33:39 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.28/2.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/2.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.28/2.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 0.28/2.45
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof found!
% 0.28/2.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/2.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object total steps : 41
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object clause steps : 28
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 16
% 0.28/2.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 24
% 0.28/2.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/2.45 # Parsed axioms : 346
% 0.28/2.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 319
% 0.28/2.45 # Initial clauses : 58
% 0.28/2.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.28/2.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 56
% 0.28/2.45 # Processed clauses : 5369
% 0.28/2.45 # ...of these trivial : 150
% 0.28/2.45 # ...subsumed : 2389
% 0.28/2.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 2830
% 0.28/2.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 88
% 0.28/2.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/2.45 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.28/2.45 # Backward-rewritten : 1920
% 0.28/2.45 # Generated clauses : 44766
% 0.28/2.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 44182
% 0.28/2.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 594
% 0.28/2.45 # Paramodulations : 44404
% 0.28/2.45 # Factorizations : 78
% 0.28/2.45 # Equation resolutions : 284
% 0.28/2.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 895
% 0.28/2.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 61
% 0.28/2.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/2.45 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.28/2.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 833
% 0.28/2.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15022
% 0.28/2.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 48523
% 0.28/2.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/2.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 1929
% 0.28/2.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1351548
% 0.28/2.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 558354
% 0.28/2.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2962
% 0.28/2.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13461
% 0.28/2.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/2.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3394
% 0.28/2.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 136
% 0.28/2.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/2.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/2.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1641649
% 0.28/2.45
% 0.28/2.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/2.45 # User time : 1.401 s
% 0.28/2.45 # System time : 0.024 s
% 0.28/2.45 # Total time : 1.425 s
% 0.28/2.45 # Maximum resident set size: 38792 pages
% 0.28/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.28/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.28/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.28/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.49 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------