TSTP Solution File: SEU268+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SEU268+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.17s 0.45s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SEU268+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 10:31:03 EDT 2022
% 0.17/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.17/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.17/0.37  Sun Jun 19 10:31:03 2022
% 0.17/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 19820.
% 0.17/0.37  
% 0.17/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.17/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.17/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.17/0.37  
% 0.17/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.17/0.37  
% 0.17/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.17/0.37  
% 0.17/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.17/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.17/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.17/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.17/0.37  
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.17/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.17/0.37  
% 0.17/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 293 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 288 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 286 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 303 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 293 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 295 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_rng_restriction(B,A)).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 365 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 366 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 367 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 348 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 349 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 346 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 347 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 362 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 363 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 0.17/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 339 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 441 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 173 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 364 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 0.17/0.44  162 back subsumes 159.
% 0.17/0.44  439 back subsumes 131.
% 0.17/0.44  471 back subsumes 242.
% 0.17/0.44  472 back subsumes 243.
% 0.17/0.44  580 back subsumes 370.
% 0.17/0.44  581 back subsumes 369.
% 0.17/0.44  582 back subsumes 371.
% 0.17/0.44  585 back subsumes 174.
% 0.17/0.44  603 back subsumes 602.
% 0.17/0.44  611 back subsumes 610.
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  ------------> process sos:
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 843 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 839 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 844 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 845 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 843 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 843 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 844 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 806 during input processing: 0 [copy,806,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 807 during input processing: 0 [copy,807,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.17/0.44  891 back subsumes 735.
% 0.17/0.44  891 back subsumes 734.
% 0.17/0.44  891 back subsumes 719.
% 0.17/0.44  891 back subsumes 638.
% 0.17/0.44  891 back subsumes 637.
% 0.17/0.44  891 back subsumes 623.
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 942 during input processing: 0 [copy,942,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 779.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 774.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 736.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 733.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 716.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 715.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 678.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 649.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 643.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 636.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 626.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 625.
% 0.17/0.44  942 back subsumes 600.
% 0.17/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 943 during input processing: 0 [copy,943,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 0.17/0.44  968 back subsumes 126.
% 0.17/0.44  970 back subsumes 127.
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.17/0.44  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.17/0.44  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.17/0.44  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.17/0.44  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.17/0.44  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.17/0.44  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  
% 0.17/0.44  The job finished Sun Jun 19 10:31:04 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------