TSTP Solution File: SEU265+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SEU265+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:25:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU265+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 02:40:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.13/0.37 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.37 #
% 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 37 Number of unprocessed: 37
% 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37 # 37 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37 # Found 10 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.37 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37 # 27 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37 # 10 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.13/0.37 # Returning from population with 11 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.37 # We now have 11 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.51 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.51 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.51
% 0.18/0.51 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.51 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (empty(empty_set))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (empty(esk7_0))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~empty(esk8_0))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (subset(X1,X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (element(esk5_1(X1),X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (element(X1,powerset(X2))|~subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|~element(X1,powerset(X2)))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (relation_of2_as_subset(esk11_0,esk10_0,esk9_0))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (~empty(X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (element(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2)|~element(X2,powerset(X3)))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (relation_of2(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (relation_of2_as_subset(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (X1=X2|in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (in(esk12_0,esk10_0)|relation_dom_as_subset(esk10_0,esk9_0,esk11_0)!=esk10_0)).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (relation(X1)|~element(X1,powerset(cartesian_product2(X2,X3))))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (X1=X2|~in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(esk14_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)|~relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3)|~relation_of2(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (relation_dom_as_subset(X2,X3,X1)=relation_dom(X1)|~relation_of2(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (element(X1,powerset(cartesian_product2(X2,X3)))|~relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (in(X1,relation_dom(X2))|~relation(X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (in(X1,relation_rng(X2))|~relation(X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X1),singleton(X3)),X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (in(X1,X4)|X4!=relation_dom(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_35, negated_conjecture, (relation_dom_as_subset(esk10_0,esk9_0,esk11_0)=esk10_0|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk13_1(X1)),singleton(X1)),esk11_0)|~in(X1,esk10_0))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (element(relation_dom_as_subset(X2,X3,X1),powerset(X2))|~relation_of2(X1,X2,X3))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (relation_dom_as_subset(esk10_0,esk9_0,esk11_0)!=esk10_0|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk12_0,X1),singleton(esk12_0)),esk11_0))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (X2=relation_dom(X1)|in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk2_2(X1,X2))),X1)|~relation(X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X2=relation_dom(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_2(X1,X2),X3),singleton(esk2_2(X1,X2))),X1))).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk1_3(X3,X2,X1)),singleton(X1)),X3)|X2!=relation_dom(X3)|~relation(X3)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.51 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.51 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.51 # Found 4 steps
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (relation_of2_as_subset(esk11_0,esk10_0,esk9_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (relation_of2_as_subset(esk11_0,esk10_0,esk9_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_302, plain, (relation_of2(esk11_0,esk10_0,esk9_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.18/0.51 cnf(i_0_338, plain, (relation_dom_as_subset(esk10_0,esk9_0,esk11_0)=relation_dom(esk11_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_338, ...])).
% 0.18/0.51 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.51 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.51 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.52 # Child (30284) has found a proof.
% 0.18/0.52
% 0.18/0.52 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.52 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------