%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU264+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.43s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU264+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 16:59:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.43  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS derived 21 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 32 clauses.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS allocated 85137 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 11 :
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.43  1[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc7,skc4)*r.
% 0.19/0.43  3[0:Inp] ||  -> relation_of2_as_subset(skc6,skc5,skc7)*.
% 0.19/0.43  5[0:Inp] || relation_of2_as_subset(skc6,skc5,skc4)* -> .
% 0.19/0.43  14[0:Inp] || relation_of2_as_subset(u,v,w)* -> subset(relation_rng(u),w).
% 0.19/0.43  16[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> subset(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.43  17[0:Inp] || subset(relation_rng(u),v) relation_of2_as_subset(u,w,x)* -> relation_of2_as_subset(u,w,v)*.
% 0.19/0.43  19[0:Res:3.0,14.0] ||  -> subset(relation_rng(skc6),skc7)*l.
% 0.19/0.43  24[0:Res:17.2,5.0] || subset(relation_rng(skc6),skc4) relation_of2_as_subset(skc6,skc5,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.43  26[0:Res:3.0,24.1] || subset(relation_rng(skc6),skc4)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.43  38[0:NCh:16.2,16.0,26.0,19.0] || subset(skc7,skc4)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.43  39[0:MRR:38.0,1.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.43  Formulae used in the proof : t16_relset_1 t12_relset_1 t1_xboole_1 t14_relset_1
% 0.19/0.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------