TSTP Solution File: SEU256+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU256+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU256+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 07:06:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.40 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.40 Mon Jun 20 07:06:59 2022
% 0.19/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12436.
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.40 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.40 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.40 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 258 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 254 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 253 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 267 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 258 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 260 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_rng_restriction(B,A)).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 329 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 330 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 331 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 108 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 312 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 313 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 310 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 311 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 326 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 327 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 0.19/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 303 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 397 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 151 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 328 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 0.19/0.48 140 back subsumes 137.
% 0.19/0.48 395 back subsumes 109.
% 0.19/0.48 520 back subsumes 334.
% 0.19/0.48 521 back subsumes 333.
% 0.19/0.48 522 back subsumes 335.
% 0.19/0.48 525 back subsumes 152.
% 0.19/0.48 543 back subsumes 542.
% 0.19/0.48 551 back subsumes 550.
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 725 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 723 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 726 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 727 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 725 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 725 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 726 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 691 during input processing: 0 [copy,691,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 692 during input processing: 0 [copy,692,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.19/0.48 773 back subsumes 648.
% 0.19/0.48 773 back subsumes 647.
% 0.19/0.48 773 back subsumes 632.
% 0.19/0.48 773 back subsumes 576.
% 0.19/0.48 773 back subsumes 575.
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 822 during input processing: 0 [copy,822,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 677.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 672.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 649.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 646.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 629.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 628.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 591.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 587.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 581.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 574.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 564.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 563.
% 0.19/0.48 822 back subsumes 540.
% 0.19/0.48 Following clause subsumed by 823 during input processing: 0 [copy,823,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 0.19/0.48 848 back subsumes 104.
% 0.19/0.48 850 back subsumes 105.
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.19/0.48 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.19/0.48 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.19/0.48 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.19/0.48 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.19/0.48 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.19/0.48 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 The job finished Mon Jun 20 07:06:59 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------