TSTP Solution File: SEU253+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU253+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 25.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  167 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   22 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  201 (  76   ~;  94   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (   6 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t19_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X3,X2)))
       => ( in(X1,relation_field(X3))
          & in(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t19_wellord1) ).

fof(l4_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ( connected(X1)
      <=> ! [X2,X3] :
            ~ ( in(X2,relation_field(X1))
              & in(X3,relation_field(X1))
              & X2 != X3
              & ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
              & ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l4_wellord1) ).

fof(dt_k2_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k2_wellord1) ).

fof(t16_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(X1,relation_restriction(X3,X2))
      <=> ( in(X1,X3)
          & in(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X2)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t16_wellord1) ).

fof(t106_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t106_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t23_wellord1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( connected(X2)
       => connected(relation_restriction(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t23_wellord1) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( in(X4,relation_field(X6))
        | ~ in(X4,relation_field(relation_restriction(X6,X5)))
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X4,relation_field(relation_restriction(X6,X5)))
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t19_wellord1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ connected(X4)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_field(X4))
        | ~ in(X6,relation_field(X4))
        | X5 = X6
        | in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),X4)
        | in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X4)
        | ~ relation(X4) )
      & ( in(esk3_1(X4),relation_field(X4))
        | connected(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4) )
      & ( in(esk4_1(X4),relation_field(X4))
        | connected(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4) )
      & ( esk3_1(X4) != esk4_1(X4)
        | connected(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(X4),esk4_1(X4)),X4)
        | connected(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk4_1(X4),esk3_1(X4)),X4)
        | connected(X4)
        | ~ relation(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l4_wellord1])])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X3)
      | relation(relation_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_wellord1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X2,relation_field(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( connected(X1)
    | in(esk3_1(X1),relation_field(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( in(X4,X6)
        | ~ in(X4,relation_restriction(X6,X5))
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(X4,cartesian_product2(X5,X5))
        | ~ in(X4,relation_restriction(X6,X5))
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X4,X6)
        | ~ in(X4,cartesian_product2(X5,X5))
        | in(X4,relation_restriction(X6,X5))
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t16_wellord1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( in(X5,X7)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( in(X6,X8)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ in(X5,X7)
        | ~ in(X6,X8)
        | in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t106_zfmisc_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
    | in(ordered_pair(X3,X2),X1)
    | X3 = X2
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_field(X1))
    | ~ in(X3,relation_field(X1))
    | ~ connected(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | in(esk3_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_field(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( connected(X1)
    | in(esk4_1(X1),relation_field(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => ( connected(X2)
         => connected(relation_restriction(X2,X1)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t23_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( in(X2,relation_restriction(X1,X3))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,cartesian_product2(X3,X3))
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(X2,X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( X1 = esk3_1(relation_restriction(X2,X3))
    | connected(relation_restriction(X2,X3))
    | in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(relation_restriction(X2,X3)),X1),X2)
    | in(ordered_pair(X1,esk3_1(relation_restriction(X2,X3))),X2)
    | ~ connected(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_field(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | in(esk4_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_field(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]),c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk2_0)
    & connected(esk2_0)
    & ~ connected(relation_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( connected(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk4_1(X1),esk3_1(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_restriction(X3,X4))
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | in(esk4_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | in(esk3_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( esk4_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)) = esk3_1(relation_restriction(X1,X3))
    | connected(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | connected(relation_restriction(X1,X3))
    | in(ordered_pair(esk4_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),esk3_1(relation_restriction(X1,X3))),X1)
    | in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(relation_restriction(X1,X3)),esk4_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2))),X1)
    | ~ connected(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    connected(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( connected(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(X1),esk4_1(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk4_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),esk3_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2))),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1)) = esk3_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X2))
    | connected(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X2))
    | connected(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1))
    | in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X2)),esk4_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1))),esk2_0)
    | in(ordered_pair(esk4_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1)),esk3_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X2))),esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),esk4_1(relation_restriction(X1,X2))),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_25]),c_0_27]),c_0_26]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1)) = esk3_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1))
    | connected(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1))
    | in(ordered_pair(esk3_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1)),esk4_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1))),esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( connected(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | esk3_1(X1) != esk4_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1)) = esk3_1(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1))
    | connected(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ connected(relation_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1))
    | ~ relation(relation_restriction(esk2_0,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relation(relation_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_11]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU253+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 00:00:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/25.54  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.37/25.54  
% 0.37/25.54  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.37/25.54  # OLD status Res
% 0.37/25.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.37/25.54  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.37/25.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.37/25.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.009 s
% 0.37/25.54  
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof found!
% 0.37/25.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/25.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object total steps             : 42
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object clause steps            : 29
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 14
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object generating inferences   : 15
% 0.37/25.54  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 18
% 0.37/25.54  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.37/25.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 45
% 0.37/25.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 22
% 0.37/25.54  # Initial clauses                      : 35
% 0.37/25.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.37/25.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 35
% 0.37/25.54  # Processed clauses                    : 3939
% 0.37/25.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.37/25.54  # ...subsumed                          : 2872
% 0.37/25.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1065
% 0.37/25.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.37/25.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.37/25.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 219
% 0.37/25.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.37/25.54  # Generated clauses                    : 11527
% 0.37/25.54  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 11379
% 0.37/25.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2812
% 0.37/25.54  # Paramodulations                      : 11522
% 0.37/25.54  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.37/25.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.37/25.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 845
% 0.37/25.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.37/25.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.37/25.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.37/25.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 828
% 0.37/25.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5731
% 0.37/25.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 43345
% 0.37/25.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.37/25.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 220
% 0.37/25.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2679693
% 0.37/25.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70236
% 0.37/25.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5903
% 0.37/25.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 494
% 0.37/25.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.37/25.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 13
% 0.37/25.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 0.37/25.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.37/25.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.37/25.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 477536
% 0.37/25.54  
% 0.37/25.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/25.54  # User time                : 2.098 s
% 0.37/25.54  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.37/25.54  # Total time               : 2.105 s
% 0.37/25.54  # Maximum resident set size: 14124 pages
% 0.37/34.83  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/34.84  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.84  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.85  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.85  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.85  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.85  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.86  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.86  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.87  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.87  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.87  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.87  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.88  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.88  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.88  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.88  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/34.89  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/34.89  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/46.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/46.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------