TSTP Solution File: SEU251+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU251+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.07s 187.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 144 ( 34 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 179 ( 75 ~; 82 |; 12 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 108 ( 7 sgn 43 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_wellord1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2,X3] :
( X3 = fiber(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( X4 != X2
& in(ordered_pair(X4,X2),X1) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_wellord1) ).
fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_tarski) ).
fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> in(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
fof(t16_wellord1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_restriction(X3,X2))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X2)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t16_wellord1) ).
fof(t21_wellord1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> subset(fiber(relation_restriction(X3,X1),X2),fiber(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t21_wellord1) ).
fof(dt_k2_wellord1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k2_wellord1) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X6,X7] :
( ( X8 != X6
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != fiber(X5,X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(X8,X6),X5)
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != fiber(X5,X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( X8 = X6
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X8,X6),X5)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != fiber(X5,X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| esk1_3(X5,X6,X7) = X6
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X6),X5)
| X7 = fiber(X5,X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( esk1_3(X5,X6,X7) != X6
| in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = fiber(X5,X6)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X6),X5)
| in(esk1_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = fiber(X5,X6)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_wellord1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X4),singleton(X3)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X3),singleton(X4)),X1)
| X2 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5) )
& ( in(esk2_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk2_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X3,X4] : unordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( in(X4,X2)
| X4 = X3
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,X6)
| ~ in(X4,relation_restriction(X6,X5))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X4,cartesian_product2(X5,X5))
| ~ in(X4,relation_restriction(X6,X5))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X4,X6)
| ~ in(X4,cartesian_product2(X5,X5))
| in(X4,relation_restriction(X6,X5))
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t16_wellord1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,fiber(X3,X2)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( X3 = X4
| in(X4,X2)
| X2 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X3),singleton(X4)),X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( in(X2,X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_restriction(X1,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( subset(fiber(X1,X2),X3)
| in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,esk2_2(fiber(X1,X2),X3)),singleton(esk2_2(fiber(X1,X2),X3))),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X1 = X2
| in(X2,X3)
| X3 != fiber(X4,X1)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X2)),X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( subset(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4)
| in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,esk2_2(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4)),singleton(esk2_2(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4))),X1)
| ~ relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> subset(fiber(relation_restriction(X3,X1),X2),fiber(X3,X2)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t21_wellord1]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( esk2_2(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4) = X3
| subset(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4)
| in(esk2_2(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4),X5)
| X5 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X2)
| X4 != X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk11_0)
& ~ subset(fiber(relation_restriction(esk11_0,esk9_0),esk10_0),fiber(esk11_0,esk10_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( esk2_2(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4) = X3
| subset(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4)
| X4 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X1 != fiber(X2,X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(fiber(relation_restriction(esk11_0,esk9_0),esk10_0),fiber(esk11_0,esk10_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( subset(fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3),X4)
| in(X3,fiber(relation_restriction(X1,X2),X3))
| X4 != fiber(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk11_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,fiber(X1,X2)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk10_0,fiber(relation_restriction(esk11_0,esk9_0),esk10_0))
| ~ relation(relation_restriction(esk11_0,esk9_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| relation(relation_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_wellord1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ relation(relation_restriction(esk11_0,esk9_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( relation(relation_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_33])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SEU251+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 04:54:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.31/23.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.31/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.31/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/24.76 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/47.77 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/69.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/69.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/69.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.54/70.78 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/92.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/92.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/92.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.65/93.79 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.75/115.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.75/115.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.75/116.82 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.75/117.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.86/138.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.86/139.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.86/139.84 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.86/140.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.97/161.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.97/162.20 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.97/162.87 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.98/163.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/185.26 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/185.93 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/186.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/186.81 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_bb5e3cecdbc7660bd3a6f864cadb7769d8aea26a for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,,500,1.0)
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.07/187.26 # Parsed axioms : 40
% 1.07/187.26 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 29
% 1.07/187.26 # Initial clauses : 19
% 1.07/187.26 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 1.07/187.26 # Processed clauses : 1485
% 1.07/187.26 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # ...subsumed : 199
% 1.07/187.26 # ...remaining for further processing : 1286
% 1.07/187.26 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.07/187.26 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 7551
% 1.07/187.26 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Generated clauses : 9085
% 1.07/187.26 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 9017
% 1.07/187.26 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Paramodulations : 8983
% 1.07/187.26 # Factorizations : 26
% 1.07/187.26 # Equation resolutions : 76
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of processed clauses : 1285
% 1.07/187.26 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 374
% 1.07/187.26 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 1.07/187.26 # Non-unit-clauses : 908
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.07/187.26 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 74736
% 1.07/187.26 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10151
% 1.07/187.26 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 199
% 1.07/187.26 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 1.07/187.26 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # BW rewrite match attempts : 67897
% 1.07/187.26 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5187320
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.07/187.26 # User time : 1.906 s
% 1.07/187.26 # System time : 0.082 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Total time : 1.988 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Maximum resident set size: 176180 pages
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e252f7803940d118fa0ef69fc2319cb55aee23b9 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,03,100,1.0)
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_b1d72019af42f5b571a6c0b233a5b6d1de064075 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e96ef4641ae500918cdd95fcfce21e29f2ac5eec for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,6.0,,03,100,1.0)
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_1f734394cb6ce69b36c9826f6782d3567d6ecd6c for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/187.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/187.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e9eb28a402764e1f99b41605245cd0a359f475fb for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/187.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof found!
% 1.07/187.26 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.07/187.26 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object total steps : 40
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object clause steps : 25
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 1.07/187.26 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 1.07/187.26 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.07/187.26 # Parsed axioms : 40
% 1.07/187.26 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Initial clauses : 58
% 1.07/187.26 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 1.07/187.26 # Initial clauses in saturation : 46
% 1.07/187.26 # Processed clauses : 2854
% 1.07/187.26 # ...of these trivial : 20
% 1.07/187.26 # ...subsumed : 1995
% 1.07/187.26 # ...remaining for further processing : 839
% 1.07/187.26 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 1.07/187.26 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Backward-subsumed : 32
% 1.07/187.26 # Backward-rewritten : 34
% 1.07/187.26 # Generated clauses : 47564
% 1.07/187.26 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 41824
% 1.07/187.26 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Paramodulations : 47208
% 1.07/187.26 # Factorizations : 248
% 1.07/187.26 # Equation resolutions : 36
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of processed clauses : 748
% 1.07/187.26 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 1.07/187.26 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 1.07/187.26 # Negative unit clauses : 28
% 1.07/187.26 # Non-unit-clauses : 683
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37399
% 1.07/187.26 # ...number of literals in the above : 264907
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Current number of archived clauses : 67
% 1.07/187.26 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 109179
% 1.07/187.26 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21254
% 1.07/187.26 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1862
% 1.07/187.26 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5019
% 1.07/187.26 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # BW rewrite match attempts : 56
% 1.07/187.26 # BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 1.07/187.26 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.07/187.26 # Termbank termtop insertions : 929474
% 1.07/187.26
% 1.07/187.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.07/187.26 # User time : 0.554 s
% 1.07/187.26 # System time : 0.025 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Total time : 0.579 s
% 1.07/187.26 # Maximum resident set size: 35420 pages
% 1.07/208.30 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/208.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/208.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/208.32 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/208.32 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/208.98 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/208.99 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/208.99 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/209.00 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/209.00 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/209.82 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/209.84 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/209.84 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/209.85 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/209.85 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------