TSTP Solution File: SEU250+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU250+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.20s 2.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 4 unt; 4 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_462,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_field(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3qadb1dw/lgb.p',i_0_462) ).
cnf(i_0_142,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk43_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3qadb1dw/lgb.p',i_0_142) ).
cnf(i_0_141,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk43_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3qadb1dw/lgb.p',i_0_141) ).
cnf(i_0_461,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3qadb1dw/lgb.p',i_0_461) ).
cnf(i_0_470,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk104_0,esk103_0)),esk103_0)
| ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk104_0,esk103_0)),relation_field(esk104_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3qadb1dw/lgb.p',i_0_470) ).
cnf(i_0_471,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk104_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3qadb1dw/lgb.p',i_0_471) ).
cnf(c_0_478,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_field(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
i_0_462 ).
cnf(c_0_479,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk43_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_142 ).
cnf(c_0_480,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk43_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_141 ).
cnf(c_0_481,lemma,
( in(esk43_2(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3),relation_field(X1))
| subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_478,c_0_479]) ).
cnf(c_0_482,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
i_0_461 ).
cnf(c_0_483,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk104_0,esk103_0)),esk103_0)
| ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk104_0,esk103_0)),relation_field(esk104_0)) ),
i_0_470 ).
cnf(c_0_484,plain,
( subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_field(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_480,c_0_481]) ).
cnf(c_0_485,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk104_0),
i_0_471 ).
cnf(c_0_486,lemma,
( in(esk43_2(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3),X2)
| subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_482,c_0_479]) ).
cnf(c_0_487,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk104_0,esk103_0)),esk103_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_483,c_0_484]),c_0_485])]) ).
cnf(c_0_488,plain,
( subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_480,c_0_486]) ).
cnf(c_0_489,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_487,c_0_488]),c_0_485])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SEU250+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:15:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.20/2.53 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.20/2.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.20/2.53 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.20/2.53 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 8.20/2.53 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.20/2.53 #
% 8.20/2.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 8.20/2.53
% 8.20/2.53 # Proof found!
% 8.20/2.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.20/2.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.20/2.53 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.20/2.53
% 8.20/2.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.20/2.53 # User time : 0.051 s
% 8.20/2.53 # System time : 0.007 s
% 8.20/2.53 # Total time : 0.058 s
% 8.20/2.53 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.20/2.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------