TSTP Solution File: SEU250+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU250+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.83s 2.32s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 6 unt; 6 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r37_sssb/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r37_sssb/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk9_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r37_sssb/lgb.p',i_0_45) ).
cnf(i_0_41,plain,
( in(X1,relation_field(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r37_sssb/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r37_sssb/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,esk8_0)),esk8_0)
| ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,esk8_0)),relation_field(esk9_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r37_sssb/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( in(esk1_2(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3),X2)
| subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk9_0),
i_0_45 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( in(X1,relation_field(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
i_0_41 ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_2(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,X1)),X2),X1)
| subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,X1)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( in(esk1_2(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3),relation_field(X1))
| subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(X1,X2)),X3)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,esk8_0)),esk8_0)
| ~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,esk8_0)),relation_field(esk9_0)) ),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,X1)),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_2(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,X1)),X2),relation_field(esk9_0))
| subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,X1)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,esk8_0)),relation_field(esk9_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61])]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
subset(relation_field(relation_restriction(esk9_0,X1)),relation_field(esk9_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU250+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:49:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.83/2.32 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.83/2.32 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.83/2.32 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.83/2.32 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S079N
% 7.83/2.32 # and selection function SelectGrCQArEqFirst.
% 7.83/2.32 #
% 7.83/2.32 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.83/2.32 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.83/2.32
% 7.83/2.32 # Proof found!
% 7.83/2.32 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.83/2.32 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.83/2.32 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.83/2.32
% 7.83/2.32 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.83/2.32 # User time : 0.032 s
% 7.83/2.32 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.83/2.32 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 7.83/2.32 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.83/2.32
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------