TSTP Solution File: SEU249+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU249+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.39s 29.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 72 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 198 ( 25 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 213 ( 87 ~; 92 |; 15 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 126 ( 16 sgn 66 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t19_wellord1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X3,X2)))
=> ( in(X1,relation_field(X3))
& in(X1,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t19_wellord1) ).
fof(t18_wellord1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t18_wellord1) ).
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_union2(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
| in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_xboole_0) ).
fof(d6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation_field(X1) = set_union2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d6_relat_1) ).
fof(t115_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)))
<=> ( in(X1,X2)
& in(X1,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t115_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k8_relat_1) ).
fof(t140_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3),X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t140_relat_1) ).
fof(t86_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2)))
<=> ( in(X1,X2)
& in(X1,relation_dom(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t86_relat_1) ).
fof(t17_wellord1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t17_wellord1) ).
fof(t12_xboole_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t12_xboole_1) ).
fof(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k7_relat_1) ).
fof(t99_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)),relation_rng(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t99_relat_1) ).
fof(l29_wellord1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l29_wellord1) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_field(relation_restriction(X3,X2)))
=> ( in(X1,relation_field(X3))
& in(X1,X2) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t19_wellord1]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk3_0)
& in(esk1_0,relation_field(relation_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
& ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_field(esk3_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,lemma,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X4)
| relation_restriction(X4,X3) = relation_rng_restriction(X3,relation_dom_restriction(X4,X3)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t18_wellord1])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
| in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk6_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| ~ in(esk6_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk6_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| ~ in(esk6_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk6_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| in(esk6_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk6_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,relation_field(relation_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,lemma,
( relation_restriction(X1,X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ relation(X2)
| relation_field(X2) = set_union2(relation_dom(X2),relation_rng(X2)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d6_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( in(X4,X3)
| in(X4,X2)
| X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,relation_field(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( relation_field(X1) = set_union2(relation_dom(X1),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_24,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X4,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6)))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X4,relation_rng(X6))
| ~ in(X4,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6)))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X4,relation_rng(X6))
| in(X4,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X5,X6)))
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t115_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| in(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X1,set_union2(X3,X2)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,set_union2(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0)))))
| ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k8_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,lemma,
( in(X2,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0))))
| in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0))))
| ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
fof(c_0_31,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ relation(X6)
| relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6),X5) = relation_rng_restriction(X4,relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t140_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_32,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| in(X4,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t86_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0))))
| in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3))
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
fof(c_0_35,lemma,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X4)
| relation_restriction(X4,X3) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4),X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t17_wellord1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,lemma,
( in(X2,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0)))
| in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_19])]) ).
fof(c_0_38,lemma,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ subset(X3,X4)
| set_union2(X3,X4) = X4 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,lemma,
( relation_restriction(X1,X2) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1),X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
fof(c_0_41,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| relation(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_relat_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,lemma,
( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).
fof(c_0_44,lemma,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X4)
| subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X4,X3)),relation_rng(X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t99_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,relation_field(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_39]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,lemma,
( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_30]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X3,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,lemma,
( subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,set_union2(relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0)),relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0))))
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,relation_field(esk3_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,lemma,
in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0)))
| in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0)))
| ~ relation(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_0,relation_field(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_57,lemma,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X4)
| subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4)),relation_dom(X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l29_wellord1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk2_0)))
| in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_0,set_union2(relation_dom(esk3_0),relation_rng(esk3_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_23]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,lemma,
( subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,lemma,
( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,lemma,
( in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
| ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_19])]),c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_0,relation_dom(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_70,lemma,
~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]),c_0_19])]),c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,lemma,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_30]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU249+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 09:08:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.36/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/23.43 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/23.43
% 0.39/29.56 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.39/29.56
% 0.39/29.56 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.39/29.56 # OLD status Res
% 0.39/29.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.053 s
% 0.39/29.56 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.39/29.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.39/29.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.39/29.56
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof found!
% 0.39/29.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.39/29.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object total steps : 72
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object clause steps : 45
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object formula steps : 27
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object conjectures : 17
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object clause conjectures : 14
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object initial clauses used : 19
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object initial formulas used : 13
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object generating inferences : 25
% 0.39/29.56 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 25
% 0.39/29.56 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.39/29.56 # Parsed axioms : 307
% 0.39/29.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 206
% 0.39/29.56 # Initial clauses : 185
% 0.39/29.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.39/29.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 182
% 0.39/29.56 # Processed clauses : 14154
% 0.39/29.56 # ...of these trivial : 52
% 0.39/29.56 # ...subsumed : 7946
% 0.39/29.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 6156
% 0.39/29.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 114
% 0.39/29.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.39/29.56 # Backward-subsumed : 460
% 0.39/29.56 # Backward-rewritten : 510
% 0.39/29.56 # Generated clauses : 146220
% 0.39/29.56 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 137198
% 0.39/29.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3560
% 0.39/29.56 # Paramodulations : 137141
% 0.39/29.56 # Factorizations : 60
% 0.39/29.56 # Equation resolutions : 453
% 0.39/29.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 5184
% 0.39/29.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 457
% 0.39/29.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 0.39/29.56 # Negative unit clauses : 464
% 0.39/29.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 4254
% 0.39/29.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 103109
% 0.39/29.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 537509
% 0.39/29.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.39/29.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 972
% 0.39/29.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12838122
% 0.39/29.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4316713
% 0.39/29.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16159
% 0.39/29.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1402006
% 0.39/29.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 22
% 0.39/29.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1193
% 0.39/29.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 459
% 0.39/29.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.39/29.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.39/29.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2179972
% 0.39/29.56
% 0.39/29.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/29.56 # User time : 5.796 s
% 0.39/29.56 # System time : 0.102 s
% 0.39/29.56 # Total time : 5.898 s
% 0.39/29.56 # Maximum resident set size: 111764 pages
% 0.39/46.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.39/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.39/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------