TSTP Solution File: SEU248+2 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:54:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 108.56s 14.36s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:37:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 108.56/14.36 % SZS status Theorem
% 108.56/14.36 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 108.56/14.36 ~subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK190,sK191)),relation_dom(sK191))).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c1, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 ~subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK190,sK191)),relation_dom(sK191)),
% 108.56/14.36 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 108.56/14.36 subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_dom(X1)) | ~subset(X0,X1) | ~relation(X1) | ~relation(X0)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(sK190,sK191)) = relation_dom(X0)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 relation_dom(sK191) = relation_dom(X1)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c3, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 $false,
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c4, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 ~subset(X0,X1) | ~relation(X1) | ~relation(X0),
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 108.56/14.36 subset(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3),X3) | ~relation(X3)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 X0 = relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 X1 = X3).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c6, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 ~relation(X1) | ~relation(X0),
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c7, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 ~relation(X3),
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c8, axiom,
% 108.56/14.36 relation(sK191)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 X3 = sK191).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c9, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 $false,
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c10, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 $false,
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c11, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 relation(X3)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 X1 = X3).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c12, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 ~relation(X0),
% 108.56/14.36 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a5])], [c6, c11])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c13, axiom,
% 108.56/14.36 relation(relation_rng_restriction(X4,X5)) | ~relation(X5)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 X0 = relation_rng_restriction(X4,X5)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c14, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 $false,
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c12, c13])).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c15, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 ~relation(X5),
% 108.56/14.36 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c12, c13])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c16, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 relation(X3)).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 108.56/14.36 X5 = X3).
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c17, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 $false,
% 108.56/14.36 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a7])], [c15, c16])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 cnf(c18, plain,
% 108.56/14.36 $false,
% 108.56/14.36 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 108.56/14.36 bind(X0, relation_rng_restriction(sK190,sK191)),
% 108.56/14.36 bind(X1, sK191),
% 108.56/14.36 bind(X2, sK190),
% 108.56/14.36 bind(X3, sK191),
% 108.56/14.36 bind(X4, sK190),
% 108.56/14.36 bind(X5, sK191)
% 108.56/14.36 ],
% 108.56/14.36 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7])).
% 108.56/14.36
% 108.56/14.36 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------