TSTP Solution File: SEU248+2 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU248+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 02:27:11 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 5.22s
% Output : Solution 5.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2157/SEU248+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2157/SEU248+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2157/SEU248+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 2269
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.01 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.071 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X2)=>relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', dt_k8_relat_1)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X2)=>subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t117_relat_1)).
% fof(7, axiom,![X1]:(relation(X1)=>![X2]:(relation(X2)=>(subset(X1,X2)=>(subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))&subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2)))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t25_relat_1)).
% fof(306, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X2)=>subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', l29_wellord1)).
% fof(307, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X2)=>subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[306])).
% fof(343, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(relation(X2))|relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(344, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(relation(X4))|relation(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[343])).
% cnf(345,plain,(relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[344])).
% fof(348, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(relation(X2))|subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(349, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(relation(X4))|subset(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4),X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[348])).
% cnf(350,plain,(subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2)|~relation(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[349])).
% fof(360, plain,![X1]:(~(relation(X1))|![X2]:(~(relation(X2))|(~(subset(X1,X2))|(subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))&subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(361, plain,![X3]:(~(relation(X3))|![X4]:(~(relation(X4))|(~(subset(X3,X4))|(subset(relation_dom(X3),relation_dom(X4))&subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_rng(X4)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[360])).
% fof(362, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(relation(X4))|(~(subset(X3,X4))|(subset(relation_dom(X3),relation_dom(X4))&subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_rng(X4)))))|~(relation(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[361])).
% fof(363, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((((subset(relation_dom(X3),relation_dom(X4))|~(subset(X3,X4)))|~(relation(X4)))|~(relation(X3)))&(((subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_rng(X4))|~(subset(X3,X4)))|~(relation(X4)))|~(relation(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[362])).
% cnf(365,plain,(subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))|~relation(X1)|~relation(X2)|~subset(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[363])).
% fof(1759, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:(relation(X2)&~(subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[307])).
% fof(1760, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:(relation(X4)&~(subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4)),relation_dom(X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1759])).
% fof(1761, negated_conjecture,(relation(esk121_0)&~(subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0)),relation_dom(esk121_0)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[1760])).
% cnf(1762,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0)),relation_dom(esk121_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1761])).
% cnf(1763,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk121_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1761])).
% cnf(2246,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0),esk121_0)|~relation(esk121_0)|~relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1762,365,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2253,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0),esk121_0)|$false|~relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2246,1763,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2254,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0),esk121_0)|~relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[2253,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(10848,negated_conjecture,(~relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0))|~relation(esk121_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[2254,350,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(10849,negated_conjecture,(~relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[10848,1763,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(10850,negated_conjecture,(~relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk120_0,esk121_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[10849,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(10853,negated_conjecture,(~relation(esk121_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[10850,345,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(10854,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[10853,1763,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(10855,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[10854,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(10856,negated_conjecture,($false),10855,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 1207
% # ...of these trivial : 9
% # ...subsumed : 36
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1162
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 90
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 0
% # Generated clauses : 8002
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7660
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 25
% # Paramodulations : 7859
% # Factorizations : 14
% # Equation resolutions : 129
% # Current number of processed clauses: 577
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 65
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% # Negative unit clauses : 10
% # Non-unit-clauses : 499
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7650
% # ...number of literals in the above : 38772
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42806
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12042
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 119
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 66
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 55
% # Backwards rewriting index: 645 leaves, 1.55+/-3.139 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 266 leaves, 1.17+/-1.504 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 580 leaves, 1.40+/-2.687 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.535 s
% # System time : 0.016 s
% # Total time : 0.551 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.92 CPU 0.98 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.92 CPU 0.98 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2157/SEU248+2.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------