%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.29s 10.52s
% Output   : Refutation 10.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:52:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.29/10.52  
% 10.29/10.52  SPASS V 3.9 
% 10.29/10.52  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 10.29/10.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 10.29/10.52  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 10.29/10.52  SPASS derived 322 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 787 clauses.
% 10.29/10.52  SPASS allocated 121559 KBytes.
% 10.29/10.52  SPASS spent	0:0:10.17 on the problem.
% 10.29/10.52  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 10.29/10.52  		0:00:09.87 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 10.29/10.52  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 10.29/10.52  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 10.29/10.52  		0:00:00.10 for the reduction.
% 10.29/10.52  
% 10.29/10.52  
% 10.29/10.52  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 10.29/10.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% 10.29/10.52  1[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(skc14)*.
% 10.29/10.52  139[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(v,u))*.
% 10.29/10.52  148[0:Inp] || subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(skc15,skc14)),relation_dom(skc14))*l -> .
% 10.29/10.52  169[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(v,u),u)*l.
% 10.29/10.52  432[0:Inp] relation(u) relation(v) || subset(v,u) -> subset(relation_dom(v),relation_dom(u))*.
% 10.29/10.52  840[0:Res:1.0,169.0] ||  -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc14),skc14)*l.
% 10.29/10.52  925[0:Res:1.0,139.0] ||  -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc14))*.
% 10.29/10.52  1001[0:Res:432.3,148.0] relation(relation_rng_restriction(skc15,skc14)) relation(skc14) || subset(relation_rng_restriction(skc15,skc14),skc14)*l -> .
% 10.29/10.52  1004[0:MRR:1001.0,1001.1,1001.2,925.0,1.0,840.0] ||  -> .
% 10.29/10.52  % SZS output end Refutation
% 10.29/10.52  Formulae used in the proof : l29_wellord1 dt_k8_relat_1 t117_relat_1 t25_relat_1
% 10.29/10.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------