TSTP Solution File: SEU248+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.65s 2.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_338,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk78_0,esk79_0)),relation_dom(esk79_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-q4as9jeu/lgb.p',i_0_338) ).

cnf(i_0_479,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-q4as9jeu/lgb.p',i_0_479) ).

cnf(i_0_339,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk79_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-q4as9jeu/lgb.p',i_0_339) ).

cnf(i_0_426,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-q4as9jeu/lgb.p',i_0_426) ).

cnf(i_0_267,plain,
    ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-q4as9jeu/lgb.p',i_0_267) ).

cnf(c_0_485,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(esk78_0,esk79_0)),relation_dom(esk79_0)),
    i_0_338 ).

cnf(c_0_486,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_479 ).

cnf(c_0_487,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk79_0),
    i_0_339 ).

cnf(c_0_488,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk78_0,esk79_0))
    | ~ subset(relation_rng_restriction(esk78_0,esk79_0),esk79_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_485,c_0_486]),c_0_487])]) ).

cnf(c_0_489,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    i_0_426 ).

cnf(c_0_490,lemma,
    ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk78_0,esk79_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_488,c_0_489]),c_0_487])]) ).

cnf(c_0_491,plain,
    ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    i_0_267 ).

cnf(c_0_492,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_490,c_0_491]),c_0_487])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:56:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.65/2.45  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.65/2.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.65/2.45  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.65/2.45  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.65/2.45  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.65/2.45  #
% 7.65/2.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.030 s
% 7.65/2.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.65/2.45  
% 7.65/2.45  # Proof found!
% 7.65/2.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.65/2.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.65/2.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.65/2.45  
% 7.65/2.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.65/2.45  # User time                : 0.038 s
% 7.65/2.45  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.65/2.45  # Total time               : 0.043 s
% 7.65/2.45  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.65/2.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------