TSTP Solution File: SEU247+2 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU247+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:54:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 149.21s 19.54s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SEU247+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:27:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 149.21/19.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 149.21/19.54 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 149.21/19.54 relation(sK216)).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c1, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 relation(sK216),
% 149.21/19.54 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 149.21/19.54 relation_restriction(X0,X1) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0),X1) | ~relation(X0)).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 149.21/19.54 sK216 = X0).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c3, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 $false,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c4, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 relation_restriction(X0,X1) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0),X1),
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 149.21/19.54 relation_restriction(sK216,sK215) != relation_rng_restriction(sK215,relation_dom_restriction(sK216,sK215))).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 149.21/19.54 relation_restriction(sK216,sK215) = relation_restriction(X0,X1)).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 149.21/19.54 relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0),X1) = X2).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c6, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 $false,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c7, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 $false,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c8, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 X2 != relation_rng_restriction(sK215,relation_dom_restriction(sK216,sK215)),
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c9, axiom,
% 149.21/19.54 relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4),X5) = relation_rng_restriction(X3,relation_dom_restriction(X4,X5)) | ~relation(X4)).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 149.21/19.54 relation_rng_restriction(sK215,relation_dom_restriction(sK216,sK215)) = relation_rng_restriction(X3,relation_dom_restriction(X4,X5))).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c10, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 $false,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c8, c9])).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c11, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 ~relation(X4),
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c8, c9])).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c12, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 X6 != relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4),X5) | X2 != X6,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c8, c9])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 149.21/19.54 X6 = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4),X5)).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c13, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 X2 != X6,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c12])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 149.21/19.54 X2 = X6).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c14, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 $false,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c13])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c15, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 relation(sK216)).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 149.21/19.54 X4 = sK216).
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c16, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 $false,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a6])], [c11, c15])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 cnf(c17, plain,
% 149.21/19.54 $false,
% 149.21/19.54 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 149.21/19.54 bind(X0, sK216),
% 149.21/19.54 bind(X1, sK215),
% 149.21/19.54 bind(X2, relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0),X1)),
% 149.21/19.54 bind(X3, sK215),
% 149.21/19.54 bind(X4, sK216),
% 149.21/19.54 bind(X5, sK215),
% 149.21/19.54 bind(X6, relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4),X5))
% 149.21/19.54 ],
% 149.21/19.54 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6])).
% 149.21/19.54
% 149.21/19.54 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------