TSTP Solution File: SEU247+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SEU247+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 06:13:48 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 17 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 16 ~; 8 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn 19 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(97,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpkjTMGl/sel_SEU247+2.p_1',t18_wellord1) ).
fof(109,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpkjTMGl/sel_SEU247+2.p_1',t17_wellord1) ).
fof(186,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3),X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpkjTMGl/sel_SEU247+2.p_1',t140_relat_1) ).
fof(306,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[97]) ).
fof(752,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
& relation_restriction(X2,X1) != relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[306]) ).
fof(753,negated_conjecture,
? [X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
& relation_restriction(X4,X3) != relation_rng_restriction(X3,relation_dom_restriction(X4,X3)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[752]) ).
fof(754,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk32_0)
& relation_restriction(esk32_0,esk31_0) != relation_rng_restriction(esk31_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk32_0,esk31_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[753]) ).
cnf(755,negated_conjecture,
relation_restriction(esk32_0,esk31_0) != relation_rng_restriction(esk31_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk32_0,esk31_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[754]) ).
cnf(756,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk32_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[754]) ).
fof(810,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ~ relation(X2)
| relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[109]) ).
fof(811,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X4)
| relation_restriction(X4,X3) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4),X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[810]) ).
cnf(812,plain,
( relation_restriction(X1,X2) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1),X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[811]) ).
fof(1162,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3),X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[186]) ).
fof(1163,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ relation(X6)
| relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X4,X6),X5) = relation_rng_restriction(X4,relation_dom_restriction(X6,X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1162]) ).
cnf(1164,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3))
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1163]) ).
cnf(2215,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk31_0,esk32_0),esk31_0) != relation_restriction(esk32_0,esk31_0)
| ~ relation(esk32_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[755,1164,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2222,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk31_0,esk32_0),esk31_0) != relation_restriction(esk32_0,esk31_0)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2215,756,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2223,plain,
relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk31_0,esk32_0),esk31_0) != relation_restriction(esk32_0,esk31_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[2222,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(11826,plain,
~ relation(esk32_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[2223,812,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(11831,plain,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[11826,756,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(11832,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[11831,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(11833,plain,
$false,
11832,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU247+2.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpkjTMGl/sel_SEU247+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SEU247+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU247+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU247+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------