TSTP Solution File: SEU247+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:48:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.85s 1.17s
% Output   : Proof 2.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:18:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.57          ____       _                          
% 0.18/0.57    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.18/0.57   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.18/0.57  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.18/0.57  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.18/0.57  
% 0.18/0.57  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.18/0.57  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.18/0.57  
% 0.18/0.57  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.18/0.57  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.18/0.57  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.18/0.57  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.18/0.57  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.18/0.57  
% 0.18/0.57  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.18/0.57  
% 0.18/0.57  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.69/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.33/0.87  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.70/1.07  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 1.85/1.17  Prover 0: proved (552ms)
% 1.85/1.17  
% 1.85/1.17  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 1.85/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.85/1.17  
% 1.85/1.17  Generating proof ... found it (size 13)
% 2.80/1.39  
% 2.80/1.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.80/1.39  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 2.80/1.39  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = v2) & relation_rng_restriction(v0, v3) = v4 & relation_dom_restriction(v1, v0) = v3 & relation_restriction(v1, v0) = v2 & relation(v1) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v5, v8) = v9) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v7, v6) = v8) |  ~ relation(v7) |  ? [v10] : (relation_rng_restriction(v5, v7) = v10 & relation_dom_restriction(v10, v6) = v9)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v8, v6) = v9) |  ~ relation(v7) |  ? [v10] : (relation_rng_restriction(v5, v10) = v9 & relation_dom_restriction(v7, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (relation_restriction(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (relation_restriction(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (set_intersection2(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v7, v5) = v8) |  ~ relation(v6) | relation_restriction(v6, v5) = v8) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (cartesian_product2(v6, v6) = v7) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ relation(v5) | relation_restriction(v5, v6) = v8) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ relation(v6) | relation(v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ relation(v5) | relation(v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ relation(v6) |  ? [v8] : (relation_rng_restriction(v5, v6) = v8 & relation_dom_restriction(v8, v5) = v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ relation(v5) | relation(v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ relation(v5) |  ? [v8] : (cartesian_product2(v6, v6) = v8 & set_intersection2(v5, v8) = v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v6, v5) = v7) | set_intersection2(v5, v6) = v7) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v5, v6) = v7) | set_intersection2(v6, v5) = v7) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (set_intersection2(v5, v5) = v6)))
% 2.80/1.42  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 yields:
% 2.80/1.42  | (1)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_2_2) & relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0 & relation_dom_restriction(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & relation_restriction(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2 & relation(all_0_3_3) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ relation(v2) |  ? [v5] : (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v2) = v5 & relation_dom_restriction(v5, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ relation(v2) |  ? [v5] : (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v5) = v4 & relation_dom_restriction(v2, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_restriction(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_restriction(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ relation(v1) | relation_restriction(v1, v0) = v3) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (cartesian_product2(v1, v1) = v2) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ relation(v0) | relation_restriction(v0, v1) = v3) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v1) | relation(v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v0) | relation(v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ? [v3] : (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v1) = v3 & relation_dom_restriction(v3, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v0) | relation(v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v3] : (cartesian_product2(v1, v1) = v3 & set_intersection2(v0, v3) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v1, v0) = v2) | set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2) | set_intersection2(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v0) = v1))
% 2.80/1.43  |
% 2.80/1.43  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 2.80/1.43  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ relation(v2) |  ? [v5] : (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v2) = v5 & relation_dom_restriction(v5, v1) = v4))
% 2.80/1.43  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2) | set_intersection2(v1, v0) = v2)
% 2.80/1.43  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v1, v0) = v2) | set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2)
% 2.80/1.43  | (5) relation_restriction(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2
% 2.80/1.43  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_restriction(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_restriction(v3, v2) = v0))
% 2.80/1.43  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v3, v2) = v0))
% 2.80/1.44  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v0) = v1))
% 2.80/1.44  | (9) relation_dom_restriction(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 2.80/1.44  | (10) relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 2.80/1.44  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v3] : (cartesian_product2(v1, v1) = v3 & set_intersection2(v0, v3) = v2))
% 2.80/1.44  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v0) | relation(v2))
% 2.80/1.44  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (cartesian_product2(v1, v1) = v2) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ relation(v0) | relation_restriction(v0, v1) = v3)
% 2.80/1.44  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v3, v2) = v0))
% 2.80/1.44  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v0))
% 2.80/1.44  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ relation(v2) |  ? [v5] : (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v5) = v4 & relation_dom_restriction(v2, v1) = v5))
% 2.80/1.44  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v0) | relation(v2))
% 2.80/1.44  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ? [v3] : (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v1) = v3 & relation_dom_restriction(v3, v0) = v2))
% 2.80/1.44  | (19)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_2_2)
% 2.80/1.44  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ relation(v1) | relation(v2))
% 2.80/1.44  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v0))
% 2.80/1.44  | (22) relation(all_0_3_3)
% 2.80/1.44  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (relation_rng_restriction(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (relation_dom_restriction(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ relation(v1) | relation_restriction(v1, v0) = v3)
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.44  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, relation_dom_restriction(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1, relation(all_0_3_3), yields:
% 2.80/1.44  | (24)  ? [v0] : (relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0 & relation_dom_restriction(v0, all_0_4_4) = all_0_0_0)
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.44  | Instantiating formula (18) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms relation_restriction(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, relation(all_0_3_3), yields:
% 2.80/1.44  | (25)  ? [v0] : (relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0 & relation_dom_restriction(v0, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2)
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.44  | Instantiating (25) with all_11_0_6 yields:
% 2.80/1.44  | (26) relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_11_0_6 & relation_dom_restriction(all_11_0_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.44  | Applying alpha-rule on (26) yields:
% 2.80/1.44  | (27) relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_11_0_6
% 2.80/1.44  | (28) relation_dom_restriction(all_11_0_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.44  | Instantiating (24) with all_13_0_7 yields:
% 2.80/1.44  | (29) relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_13_0_7 & relation_dom_restriction(all_13_0_7, all_0_4_4) = all_0_0_0
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.44  | Applying alpha-rule on (29) yields:
% 2.80/1.44  | (30) relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_13_0_7
% 2.80/1.44  | (31) relation_dom_restriction(all_13_0_7, all_0_4_4) = all_0_0_0
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.44  | Instantiating formula (14) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_11_0_6, all_13_0_7 and discharging atoms relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_13_0_7, relation_rng_restriction(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_11_0_6, yields:
% 2.80/1.44  | (32) all_13_0_7 = all_11_0_6
% 2.80/1.44  |
% 2.80/1.45  | From (32) and (31) follows:
% 2.80/1.45  | (33) relation_dom_restriction(all_11_0_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_0_0
% 2.80/1.45  |
% 2.80/1.45  | Instantiating formula (7) with all_11_0_6, all_0_4_4, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms relation_dom_restriction(all_11_0_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_0_0, relation_dom_restriction(all_11_0_6, all_0_4_4) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 2.80/1.45  | (34) all_0_0_0 = all_0_2_2
% 2.80/1.45  |
% 2.80/1.45  | Equations (34) can reduce 19 to:
% 2.80/1.45  | (35) $false
% 2.80/1.45  |
% 2.80/1.45  |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.80/1.45  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.80/1.45  
% 2.80/1.45  869ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------